Good percentages show that he isn't just putting up good numbers on a bad team, now if he was shooting 30% your point would be valid, but he isn't and you do not have a point.ilikecb4 wrote:I hate the dude...he's a slow white stiff...
he's pretty boring...he screwed warriors pretty bad...had some consistenly garbage games...
He's basically putting up good numbers on a bad team...
see: MIKE JAMES toronto raptors
He can't create his own shot, his D is sorely lacking, his quickness is minimal...
Don't even try to compare Luol Deng to this bum...
He's just putting up good numbers on a bad team...that's it..
Mr. Consistency
Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,434
- And1: 4
- Joined: May 31, 2007
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,786
- And1: 930
- Joined: Apr 01, 2006
- Location: knicks
- ilikecb4
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,467
- And1: 4
- Joined: Apr 12, 2007
- Location: Somewhere is the Sea of Red
jeremy1215 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Good percentages show that he isn't just putting up good numbers on a bad team, now if he was shooting 30% your point would be valid, but he isn't and you do not have a point.
So what? Mike James was shooting 47% from the field and 44% from the 3 point line, while averaging career high 20 points a game. He's STILL a bum. He's STILL putting up good numbers on a bad team..
Indiana is a bad team.
Now he's getting like 7 ppg on the Rockets.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3577/career
- XTC
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,130
- And1: 6,256
- Joined: Nov 09, 2005
jeremy1215 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Good percentages show that he isn't just putting up good numbers on a bad team, now if he was shooting 30% your point would be valid, but he isn't and you do not have a point.
Mike James was puttin up EVEN BETTER NUMBERS, on EVEN BETTER PERCENTAGES lol, on more points, assists, and could create his own shot.
Was probably the best 3 point shooter in the NBA that year. Dunleavy is an average player putting up good numbers on a bad team.
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 67,016
- And1: 19,321
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Dunleavy is nothing more than a solid player. He's well above average on offense, and slightly below average on defense. Overall, he's probably a slightly above-average player.
An average player earns the MLE: $5.3M dollars. Dunleavy, being a little above-average, probably deserves about $6M. He is actually paid $8.2M.
So he is still not worth his contract and that probably explains the hate.
An average player earns the MLE: $5.3M dollars. Dunleavy, being a little above-average, probably deserves about $6M. He is actually paid $8.2M.
So he is still not worth his contract and that probably explains the hate.