Mr. Consistency

Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris

jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#21 » by jeremy1215 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:08 am

ilikecb4 wrote:I hate the dude...he's a slow white stiff...

he's pretty boring...he screwed warriors pretty bad...had some consistenly garbage games...

He's basically putting up good numbers on a bad team...

see: MIKE JAMES toronto raptors

He can't create his own shot, his D is sorely lacking, his quickness is minimal...

Don't even try to compare Luol Deng to this bum...

He's just putting up good numbers on a bad team...that's it..
Good percentages show that he isn't just putting up good numbers on a bad team, now if he was shooting 30% your point would be valid, but he isn't and you do not have a point.
User avatar
Egg Nog
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,138
And1: 8,373
Joined: Oct 27, 2007
Location: Vancouver

 

Post#22 » by Egg Nog » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:56 am

jeremy1215 wrote:He hasn't been called a prick here in Indiana, not at all. And if my fans hated my guts I think i'd be a jerk to them too.


Of course he's not being called that in Indiana.

If your fans hated your guts, they wouldn't be your fans now would they?
bringinhinkie
General Manager
Posts: 9,786
And1: 930
Joined: Apr 01, 2006
Location: knicks
 

 

Post#23 » by bringinhinkie » Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:18 am

mr consistency.. hmmm

jamal cr--- oh its mike dunleavy?


:nonono: :nonono: :noway: :noway:
User avatar
ilikecb4
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,467
And1: 4
Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Location: Somewhere is the Sea of Red

 

Post#24 » by ilikecb4 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:22 am

jeremy1215 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Good percentages show that he isn't just putting up good numbers on a bad team, now if he was shooting 30% your point would be valid, but he isn't and you do not have a point.


So what? Mike James was shooting 47% from the field and 44% from the 3 point line, while averaging career high 20 points a game. He's STILL a bum. He's STILL putting up good numbers on a bad team..

Indiana is a bad team.

Now he's getting like 7 ppg on the Rockets.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3577/career
User avatar
XTC
Head Coach
Posts: 7,130
And1: 6,256
Joined: Nov 09, 2005
 

 

Post#25 » by XTC » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:32 pm

jeremy1215 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Good percentages show that he isn't just putting up good numbers on a bad team, now if he was shooting 30% your point would be valid, but he isn't and you do not have a point.


Mike James was puttin up EVEN BETTER NUMBERS, on EVEN BETTER PERCENTAGES lol, on more points, assists, and could create his own shot.

Was probably the best 3 point shooter in the NBA that year. Dunleavy is an average player putting up good numbers on a bad team.
User avatar
The Letter J
Starter
Posts: 2,207
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 30, 2005

 

Post#26 » by The Letter J » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:42 pm

MagicFan3 wrote:No one hates Dunleavy. He's just a very boring player, so he gets no attention.

You're forgetting about the entire bay area.
Image
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 67,016
And1: 19,321
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

 

Post#27 » by nate33 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:49 pm

Dunleavy is nothing more than a solid player. He's well above average on offense, and slightly below average on defense. Overall, he's probably a slightly above-average player.

An average player earns the MLE: $5.3M dollars. Dunleavy, being a little above-average, probably deserves about $6M. He is actually paid $8.2M.

So he is still not worth his contract and that probably explains the hate.

Return to The General Board