If the Suns somehow landed 'Sheed...

Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro

Prop
Veteran
Posts: 2,841
And1: 34
Joined: Jul 16, 2004

If the Suns somehow landed 'Sheed... 

Post#1 » by Prop » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:52 am

could they finally get to the finals and win?

I was thinking about who could really help them and 'Sheed seems like a terrific fit. He'd help greatly with interior defense (esp. post d), can give them another offensive option down low, he can help out on the boards, he adds toughness, can step out and hit the 3...

It's not all that realistic but still, I was trying to come up with a non-star who can generally help out in a lot of areas they are deficient in while still being able to fit in with Suns' style of play.

'Sheed seems right. Whatcha think?
KnicksH20
Rookie
Posts: 1,056
And1: 41
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Location: NYC
 

 

Post#2 » by KnicksH20 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:58 am

Stoudemire
Sheed
Marion
Hill
Nash

Maybe. But Hill and Marion would be playing out of position, and you can't bring Hill off the bench, so it might be clustered.

They'd win the close games because of Sheed, but he would disrupt their offense by chucking threes left and right in this green light offense.
Agent0
Banned User
Posts: 772
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 23, 2007

 

Post#3 » by Agent0 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:07 am

KnicksH20 wrote:Stoudemire
Sheed
Marion
Hill
Nash

Maybe. But Hill and Marion would be playing out of position, and you can't bring Hill off the bench, so it might be clustered.

They'd win the close games because of Sheed, but he would disrupt their offense by chucking threes left and right in this green light offense.


What the f*** are you talking about, Bell would still start as a SG.
User avatar
L&H_05
RealGM
Posts: 11,569
And1: 94
Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Location: I love this game !
     

 

Post#4 » by L&H_05 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:17 am

Most of the East contenders would rejoice....
BobbySura
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,414
And1: 340
Joined: Dec 31, 2005

 

Post#5 » by BobbySura » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:18 am

sheed takes 30 threes a game
User avatar
Basileus777
General Manager
Posts: 7,818
And1: 2,048
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: New Jersey
 

 

Post#6 » by Basileus777 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:26 am

Sheed/Skinner
Amare/Diaw
Marion/Hill
Bell/Barbosa
Nash/Banks

This would be the best team in the league. The Suns defense would be much better with Sheed and by moving Amare and Marion to PF/SF.
GJense4181
Banned User
Posts: 9,627
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
Location: Ann Arbor

 

Post#7 » by GJense4181 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:41 am

^and the Pistons would be the best team in the league if they added Marion.
But landing a player implies trading for said player.
GreenWithEnvy
Analyst
Posts: 3,529
And1: 163
Joined: Aug 18, 2004
Location: Philly via Cali

 

Post#8 » by GreenWithEnvy » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:45 am

Basileus777 wrote:Sheed/Skinner
Amare/Diaw
Marion/Hill
Bell/Barbosa
Nash/Banks

This would be the best team in the league. The Suns defense would be much better with Sheed and by moving Amare and Marion to PF/SF.


So they are going to get him for Strawberry, Marks and a future second?
Willie Green Is The Man!
bluefear
Pro Prospect
Posts: 847
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 21, 2007

 

Post#9 » by bluefear » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:46 am

i don't see anyone accounting for what they would have to give up to get this guy...it's probably not going to be worth it in the end...unless it's fillers..
GJense4181
Banned User
Posts: 9,627
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
Location: Ann Arbor

 

Post#10 » by GJense4181 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:47 am

^
and ^^
That's what I said.
bluefear
Pro Prospect
Posts: 847
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 21, 2007

 

Post#11 » by bluefear » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:53 am

lol typing at the same time eh
User avatar
Mateen Cleaves
Head Coach
Posts: 6,483
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 19, 2005

 

Post#12 » by Mateen Cleaves » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:16 am

They would win the title. Sheed shoots a lot of 3's, not at all. He only shoots them when he is wide open. Other then that when hes on the perimeter hes passes it. Doesnt force 3's when hes covered.
Prop
Veteran
Posts: 2,841
And1: 34
Joined: Jul 16, 2004

 

Post#13 » by Prop » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:25 am

well, you're right on not accounting for what they'd give up. so say it was a marion for sheed and hayes trade.

sheed/skinner
amare/diaw
hill/hayes
bell/barbosa
nash/banks

or if detroit was smoking crack...a diaw/piatkowski for sheed trade.

sheed/skinner
amare/diaq
marion/hill
bell/barbosa
nash/banks

the latter would have to be a favorite to win...the former...not so much.
DDansby123
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,808
And1: 1
Joined: May 22, 2002

 

Post#14 » by DDansby123 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:47 am

I think adding Sheed would make any of the top 3 WC teams instant favorites.
NCHeels2008
RealGM
Posts: 12,941
And1: 3,001
Joined: Aug 24, 2005

 

Post#15 » by NCHeels2008 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:26 am

DDansby123 wrote:I think adding Sheed would make any of the top 3 WC teams instant favorites.


i think adding sheed to the spurs makes them a lock actually
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,067
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#16 » by Ballings7 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:28 am

I think they'd significantly increase their chances to do what they want to do... beat the Spurs or Dallas (the more recent Dallas, not the 2005 less developed, on-the-fly-Avery-Johnson-influenced Dallas), get to the finals, win the championship.

Lock to or most likely do all those? Absolutely not. That's not fair to some other teams in the league.

Get noticably more balanced, and skilled on both ends. Tougher.

But mental emotional toughness would still be unproven, and adding Sheed you get a mixed bag with that. He can get better and more fired up with the techs and poor calls, or it gets to him too much.

Steve Nash would still be defended effectively eventually though, by Dallas or San Antonio. They've done it in the past, and would do it again. Not sure there'd be enough to make up for that over a series. Would just have to see.

But, getting Sheed isn't that realistic, at best for Phoenix.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
joe.linnen
Banned User
Posts: 3,272
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Location: Fresno

 

Post#17 » by joe.linnen » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:17 pm

Basileus777 wrote:Sheed/Skinner
Amare/Diaw
Marion/Hill
Bell/Barbosa
Nash/Banks

This would be the best team in the league. The Suns defense would be much better with Sheed and by moving Amare and Marion to PF/SF.


Rasheed already said that he doesn't like playing Center and he stated that while playing for the Pistons.
User avatar
Magz50
Head Coach
Posts: 6,220
And1: 115
Joined: May 07, 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
   

 

Post#18 » by Magz50 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm

Imagine if the Spurs got him, they'd probably be able to keep one team under 50 points for a game! lol. A front line of Bowen, Duncan and Sheed would be flat out scary to drive against.
floris_
Freshman
Posts: 71
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 17, 2007

 

Post#19 » by floris_ » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:07 pm

Prop wrote:well, you're right on not accounting for what they'd give up. so say it was a marion for sheed and hayes trade.

sheed/skinner
amare/diaw
hill/hayes
bell/barbosa
nash/banks


If you trade Marion for Rasheed you dont gain any defense. I think this would only make the Suns better if they traded Amare for Rasheed. They would have 3 very good defenders and solid rebounding.

Suns already proved they can get far without Amare and if you trade him for Rasheed perhaps Diaw will go back to his 2005/2006 version. Then again they didnt wanna trade Amare for Garnett so this deal wont happen either.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,272
And1: 25,452
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#20 » by hermes » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:21 pm

wait how did they get sheed
for nothing?
they'd be considerably better without losing someone

you have to give something to get something

Return to The General Board