Should the Nets go for it? (Merged Threads)

Griever24 · Post #41 » by **Griever24** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:29 am

I dont know who would be left to play 2 guard for the Nets .. pacers seem to do better without O'Neal too and their weakest position is 2 guard .. so i think Pacers get better deal but i also think the Nets dont look too bad .. They wont be as bad as the Knicks but i cant help but feel like the Nets will have a Knicks feel .. low post options but no good record ..

Griever24 · Post #42 » by **Griever24** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:30 am

If im Nets i say no .. to follow up

hermes · Post #43 » by **hermes** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:19 pm

straight up?
i don't know about that

T.Duncan21 · Post #44 » by **T.Duncan21** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:59 pm

No way would I trade Vince for JO... Honestly, I don't see why IND would do it either. They might get a little better but where do they plan on going with Vince??? IMO, they need to start all over and rebuild. So even while I propose the following trade, I would not do it from IND's perspective. But if their GM is stupin in thinkin that they have a good team right now and just need to tweak their roster a bit to make things work then they should make the following trade.

RJ + Krstic + Collins for JO + Rush.

With JO's value being so low at the moment... They should still be able to do that trade and maybe even get something more back from IND. The only problem with having Vince and JO on the same team as Kidd is that they don't compliment each other. Vince and JO compliment each other but Kidd needs people who can run and finish on the fast break... otherwise, he's not that good. So while on paper, having Kidd/VC/JO looks amazing... I'm not sure if it would work out well. But I still think it's worth a shot since it balances their team out.

PG Kidd/Williams
SG Vince/Rush
SF Nachbar/Wright
PF Boone/Williams
C O'Neal/Magloire

halfHAVOC · Post #45 » by **halfHAVOC** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:32 pm

o'neal may sit season.

GASOL IS ON THE BOARDDDDD

Sean Williams + Antoine Wright + 1st round pick + magloire+collins for Gasol + fillers

T.Duncan21 · Post #46 » by **T.Duncan21** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:32 pm

halfHAVOC wrote:o'neal may sit season.

GASOL IS ON THE BOARDDDDD

Sean Williams + Antoine Wright + 1st round pick + magloire+collins for Gasol + fillers

I think u should add Malik Allen and Armstrong to make MEM really jump at the offer.

thierry · Post #47 » by **thierry** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:47 pm

I wonder what a package based on Sean Williams could get us.

Alex_De_Large · Post #48 » by **Alex_De_Large** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:01 am

i would give richard jefferson for pau gasol.

halfHAVOC · Post #49 » by **halfHAVOC** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:06 am

^ they already have mike miller and rudy gay , i doubt they want RJ. unless its miller + gasol which would make us instant contenders.

Vindicater · Post #50 » by **Vindicater** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:33 am

hmm... miller/gasol/carter/kidd...

Strange and wonderful aidea that would never work:)

jefe · Post #51 » by **jefe** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:41 am

T.Duncan21 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I think u should add Malik Allen and Armstrong to make MEM really jump at the offer.

I couldn't have said it any better.

jefe · Post #52 » by **jefe** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:44 am

halfHAVOC wrote:^ they already have mike miller and rudy gay , i doubt they want RJ. unless its miller + gasol which would make us instant contenders.

Well, the Nets don't really have the assets to land Gasol alone - when you consider what Memphis would look for in return (not just the value of what NJ actually has)