How much time do the Lakers have to win a title?
Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro
How much time do the Lakers have to win a title?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,020
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jul 27, 2005
How much time do the Lakers have to win a title?
With the gasol deal, they are clearly one of the best teams in the West. But how much time do they actually have to win at least one championship? Anything less than a championship to them should be a huge disappointment.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,658
- And1: 16
- Joined: Dec 22, 2006
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,157
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 17, 2006
- exkonvict
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,251
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 02, 2006
- Location: The OC, California
- Contact:
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,812
- And1: 1
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Phil_2.0 wrote:Buss will play the lux. tax as long as its for the right players and the team is contending.
Maybe. When we had Shaq he let the team deteriorate because he was a cheap ass. Let's not forget that Fisher, Fox, and Horry were the backups for our first championship.
"I'm sure they'll jump off the bandwagon. Then when we do get back on top, they're going to want to jump back on, and we're going to tell them there's no more room." - Kobe in March of 2005
- Griever24
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 894
- And1: 2
- Joined: Dec 25, 2007
Definetly 5 -7 year span assuming they keep their impact player's and Phil ...
I still think what they really need is time to gel ... i don't know if they can do that in time this year to such a good point to win the Chip but you never know ... if not this year than years to come should be their chance
I still think what they really need is time to gel ... i don't know if they can do that in time this year to such a good point to win the Chip but you never know ... if not this year than years to come should be their chance
Phil Jackson, RealGM MVP !
- Texas Longhorns
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,005
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
- Contact:
- LA
- Sophomore
- Posts: 108
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 02, 2007
I agree with 5-7 years. that's about as long as Kobe is expected to play for.
but since most of the core is still very young, once kobe is gone the Lakers should still be pretty competitive.
Gasol, Bynum, Farmar, Turiaf, Sasha, Ariza should all still be here. Shaw will probably be coaching at that time. Odom is probably going to be gone in 2 years time unless he agrees to re-sign to a smaller contract(7-8mil).
the present AND future looks good for the Lakers. they may not win the title this year though, but next season anything less than a championship is a disappointment.
but since most of the core is still very young, once kobe is gone the Lakers should still be pretty competitive.
Gasol, Bynum, Farmar, Turiaf, Sasha, Ariza should all still be here. Shaw will probably be coaching at that time. Odom is probably going to be gone in 2 years time unless he agrees to re-sign to a smaller contract(7-8mil).
the present AND future looks good for the Lakers. they may not win the title this year though, but next season anything less than a championship is a disappointment.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,744
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 20, 2005
- Location: California
When kobe's done it will be the Bynum and Farmar show a la Duncan and parker. We'll just need another player to fit into the dynasty. Maybe even an old and beat up Gasol could still play and contribute at the four. The franchise has a BRIGHT future for this and the next generation. It's pretty crazy how everything turned out.