Why did Golden State trade Richardson?

Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro

pr0wler
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,241
And1: 3,367
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
     

Why did Golden State trade Richardson? 

Post#1 » by pr0wler » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:37 am

I'm still puzzled by the deal on the NBA draft which sent Jason Richardson to Charlotte for the TE and rights to Brandan Wright. In terms of potential, it seems like a good idea for Golden State, but aren't the Warriors playing for now? It'll be a few years before Wright will be able to provide a major role for the team. By then their core will be in their early 30's and slowly declining. Now with Pietrus unhappy and out of the rotation, I really like the Warriors with Richardson as their starting SG.

On the flip side, I think the Bobcats have fallen into the mediocrity zone. They have some solid starters with Richardson, Wallace, and Okafor but nothing close to a superstar. Unfortunately, their record isn't bad enough to get a top pick so essentially they'll be hovering around 7-10th. You have to figure that if they just took Brandan Wright themselves they'd have a Top 3 pick and a chance to finally draft a franchise level player. But as it sounds they'll be adding another "pretty good" "rotation level" player to their unspectacular lineup.

It just doesn't make sense to me for both teams.
theTHIEF
RealGM
Posts: 12,940
And1: 214
Joined: Aug 08, 2003
 

 

Post#2 » by theTHIEF » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:41 am

redundancy, felt that they wouldn't need him and they got a decent deal for him?
User avatar
T-Spot
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2008

 

Post#3 » by T-Spot » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:43 am

More room for Ellis to beast on everyone.
theTHIEF
RealGM
Posts: 12,940
And1: 214
Joined: Aug 08, 2003
 

 

Post#4 » by theTHIEF » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:46 am

plus they are going to have to work on re-signing like 3 guys this year right? Biedrins, Ellis and Azabukie? two of which im sure will get big deals, and Richardson has a hefty tag...so, i would assume they were trying to make room for those guys...
Harm14
Freshman
Posts: 56
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 12, 2008

 

Post#5 » by Harm14 » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:48 am

Well, the Warriors aren't exactly doing bad this year. It's tough, but it was the right thing to do ($$$$)
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#6 » by dockingsched » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:49 am

beautiful trade for the warriors. ellis stepped up and replaced jrich, the warriors saved a ton of money, and they got a top prospect (even though he ever plays). a very underrated move imo.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
Flash3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 52,635
And1: 403
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Location: L-I-M-R

 

Post#7 » by Flash3 » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:53 am

What's Belenelli up to?

Wasn't he labeled as a sure hit player coming out with all the hype following him?

How's he fairing in GS?
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.
some_rand
Banned User
Posts: 3,297
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 09, 2007

 

Post#8 » by some_rand » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:53 am

he became expendable with the emergence of ellis and their other young guys showed promise. so they the TE and a guy with a ton of potention who fits their system
Patterns
Banned User
Posts: 6,008
And1: 18
Joined: Sep 19, 2007

 

Post#9 » by Patterns » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:51 am

And the Bobcats needed to do it because they had to be over the cap minimum. Good deal for both teams involved.
User avatar
NH_soxfan14
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 08, 2007
Location: New Hampshire

 

Post#10 » by NH_soxfan14 » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:54 am

Brandon Wright fits pretty well in that Nellie ball system. Monta Ellis is a budding star and would have to come off the bench behind Jrich.
Image

RSN
mudnug
Freshman
Posts: 59
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 05, 2007

 

Post#11 » by mudnug » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:04 am

It was Foyle 9 mil contract!

SHAME ON HIM!!!
User avatar
Joseph17
RealGM
Posts: 10,430
And1: 529
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: New York
   

 

Post#12 » by Joseph17 » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:14 am

They did because they have players who are capable of replacing him.
MagicFan3
Banned User
Posts: 8,982
And1: 20
Joined: Jun 21, 2005
Location: Superman!

 

Post#13 » by MagicFan3 » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:19 am

They thought they could win without him... I guess they were right.
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,354
And1: 7,111
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

 

Post#14 » by giberish » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:11 am

GS made the trade because their ownership didn't want to pay the luxury tax. This was a bigger issue for next year than this year, but it's often difficult to get immediate luxury tax relief without paying a high price so they acted ahead when a good deal came along.
JRich was a large contract player who could be moved for salary relief + additional value (as opposed to Foyle who would have taken assets to move). Yet, as pointed out, GS had enough other quality perimeter players to withstand the loss without a big effect on the teams record (as opposed to trading Baron Davis).

For Charlotte, they felt they were ready to step up from promising young team to playoff team. JRich filled out their biggest positional need (SG) and role (lead perimeter scorer). The fit between the two teams is why fans of both teams talked about the trade as a good idea in the months leading up to the draft.

Unfortunately for Charlotte other problems have hurt them. They expected Felton to improve significantly (talk was having Brevin Knight around was hampering him), but Felton has instead regressed. They also lost May for the season and went several months with only one competent post player on the roster.
User avatar
Bucky O'Hare
Banned User
Posts: 1,000
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Blazer Fans Love Me!

 

Post#15 » by Bucky O'Hare » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:17 am

It's a shame Brandan Wright is such a horrible basketball player. Honestly, this kids no better than Marcus Haislip. Short, skinny PF with close to 0 skill. He and Corey Brewer are the busts of 2007.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,354
And1: 5,965
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#16 » by gswhoops » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:34 am

JRich was a great player for us, but it's not like we've suffered in his absence.
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#17 » by crzy » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:40 am

J-Rich is a very good player. But simply put, we did not believe he was worth $12-$14 million per year. And we got a top prospect out of it.
Image
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#18 » by crzy » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:43 am

As for Marco Belinelli and Brandan Wright, Don Nelson has frequently stated that he has no intention of playing either rookie this season. A decision which has irked some Warrior fans.
Image
rcs15
Junior
Posts: 280
And1: 109
Joined: May 19, 2007

 

Post#19 » by rcs15 » Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:06 am

Bucky O'Hare wrote:It's a shame Brandan Wright is such a horrible basketball player. Honestly, this kids no better than Marcus Haislip. Short, skinny PF with close to 0 skill. He and Corey Brewer are the busts of 2007.


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
CupcakeNoFillin
Banned User
Posts: 1,383
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 07, 2007

 

Post#20 » by CupcakeNoFillin » Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:15 am

Warriors are a .600 team right now and are doing much better than they were at this point last season. In order to get better you have to make sacrifices and getting rid of J-Rich was necessary in order to have enough money to re-sign important players.

Stephen Jackson is much more important this season for the Warriors than Jason Richardson ever was last season. Also Monta Ellis had bee playing OUT OF HIS MIND for the past 2 months. Everything seems good for the Warriors right now, they just need a rebounder that can fuel their fastbreak game.

Return to The General Board