Best team, if no fouls were called.

Post #1 » by **jazzfan1971** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:37 pm

Just wondering what would be the best lineup you could put on the court if players were allowed to be as physical as they liked. Pushing, shoving, grabbing, etc, are all allowed, and the only way to combat it is to be even more physical on the other end.

My attempt

C - Shaq = Got to have the biggest boy on the floor. Shaq should control the paint, after all, no 3 second rule, and who's strong enough to move him out of there?

PF - Rasheed = I have to think Rasheed unleased is a marvel to behold. He'll spread the floor and hold his own against any offensive player.

SF - Artest = Duh.

SG - Bruce Bowen = I thought about this a lot and decided that the two most important skills for my SG would be 3pt shooting and defense. Slashers need not apply as the paint will be a no-no for guards.

PG - Chauncy Billups = Again, I went with defense and 3 point shooting.

RoyceDa59 · Post #2 » by **RoyceDa59** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:40 pm

Cc Howard
PF Garnett
SF James
SG Allen
PG Kidd

You've got to think both offensively and defensively. Offensively, you cant hack what you cant catch as this team would simply out run everyone. Defensively, you've still got a monsterous front court and a big backcourt.

Post #3 » by **Worm Guts** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:42 pm

I think you'd be better off with an NFL linebacking core than with any current NBA players.

kdot99 · Post #4 » by **kdot99** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:44 pm

PG D. Williams
SG James
SF Garnett
PF Howard
C- Shaq

Post #5 » by **5DOM** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:44 pm

Worm Guts wrote:I think you'd be better off with an NFL linebacking core than with any current NBA players.

if travelling or double dribble was considered a foul

MagicFan3 · Post #6 » by **MagicFan3** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:45 pm

Any team with Shaq or Dwight on it would be terrible if there were no foul calls. They would be completely ineffective with 2-3 guys grabbing them at all times.

YiYaoYue · Post #7 » by **YiYaoYue** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:47 pm

PG- James
SG- Artest
SF- Garnett
PF- Howard
C- Shaq

kdot99 · Post #8 » by **kdot99** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:48 pm

MagicFan3 wrote:Any team with Shaq or Dwight on it would be terrible if there were no foul calls. They would be completely ineffective with 2-3 guys grabbing them at all times.

Or they can just bulldoze them over...

Pats19andO · Post #9 » by **Pats19andO** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:48 pm

Shaq
D12
Artest
S Jax
Baron/J kidd

Post #10 » by **tkb** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:51 pm

I'd go big in the back court, but there still need to be a couple semi-respectable shooters on the floor.

C - Dwight
F - Garnett
F - Artest
G - James
G - Bryant

Post #11 » by **5DOM** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:54 pm

put boykins on shaq's shoulders

Post #12 » by **jazzfan1971** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:58 pm

I got to thinking and I guess 3 seconds would still be a call. You've still got to have violations. Otherwise goal tending would be allowed, and nobody would ever score.

So, basically just letting them play as physical as they like, but, otherwise still basketball.

D-Wags#13 · Post #13 » by **D-Wags#13** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:59 pm

MagicFan3 wrote:Any team with Shaq or Dwight on it would be terrible if there were no foul calls. They would be completely ineffective with 2-3 guys grabbing them at all times.

who would be effective with 2 or 3 guys hanging at their arms?

Post #14 » by **jazzfan1971** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:03 pm

The guys who are undefended?

Jemini80 · Post #15 » by **Jemini80** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:15 pm

Carmelo and KG would immediately no longer be allstars since they would be to busy running away from confrontation.

Post #16 » by **King Roosk** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:16 pm

Baron Davis and Stephen Jackson vs the world.