Page 1 of 1
Does KVH mean nobody will retire anymore?
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:17 am
by Storm Surge
If I were a player thinking about retirement I would decide not to and just play a KVH. What benefit does retiring do? If you are not going to make the Hall why retire? You know how big of assets guys like KVH could be to teams trying to trade?
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:27 am
by MagicFan3
The ones that really don't want to play ever again will.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:39 am
by revprodeji
I like the lay-up in your avatar.
Wolves can trade spree.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:19 am
by theBigLip
There is no reason to "officially" retire.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:35 am
by Guy986
revprodeji wrote:I like the lay-up in your avatar.
Wolves can trade spree.
HATER!
Its called a lay-down.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:50 am
by greenbeans
i dont think this will continue after this year. all the press its gettin isnt goin to sit well with he higher-ups, thats for sure.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:55 am
by Hairy Midget
revprodeji wrote:I like the lay-up in your avatar.
Wolves can trade spree.
Called a dunk, look it up in the dictionary.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:59 am
by applesauce
Replace Aaron McKie with KVH.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:05 am
by Bgil
I bet the league will change that rule this off season or whenever the new CBA is made. Signing retired players to large contacts so they can be used as an expiring contract/trade filler is not at all what the league had in mind when they create that rule.
The 30-day Gary Paytn rule needs to be changed too. It needs to be a full season.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:49 am
by jacoby1us
Hairy Midget wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Called a dunk, look it up in the dictionary.
which is somethn he didnt do
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:28 am
by gavran
jacoby1us wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
which is somethn he didnt do
Hairy Midget wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Called a dunk, look it up in the dictionary.
which is something you didn't do. (I was answering to jacoby1us)
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:45 am
by DelaneyRudd
I think come the new CBA this little hole will be filled. Congrats fellow Ute, spend the money on many fine luxuries.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:39 am
by D-Wags#13
don't nba players that played at least 3 yrs in the league get a retirement pay. so probably u need to retire to recieve that money.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:59 pm
by One of Shemps Kids
D-Wags#13 wrote:don't nba players that played at least 3 yrs in the league get a retirement pay. so probably u need to retire to recieve that money.
Exactly. I don't think the NBA will be filling any hole because as long as players aren't filling retirement papers, they aren't getting paid JACK from the NBA for retirement. Fill your papers, or don't, the NBA isn't changing any rules either way.
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:46 pm
by Guy986
gavran wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
which is something you didn't do. (I was answering to jacoby1us)
lay-up
–noun 1. a shot with one hand from a point close to the basket, in which a player shoots the ball toward the basket
Nice layup Dwight.
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:23 am
by BiggerthanBoykins
Guy986 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
lay-up
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:53 am
by Mykhyn
Uh it's a lay-UP. The ball has to be going up to be a lay up.. not down..
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:57 am
by chrice
