Largest Rotation?

Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris

Taiwan Killa
Banned User
Posts: 1,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2007

Largest Rotation? 

Post#1 » by Taiwan Killa » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:15 am

What's the largest rotation of players in recent league history? I thought of this because the Lakers have a 10 man rotation and that's not even including Bynum and Ariza who will get minutes.

Has there been any larger rotations in recent memory?
Agent0
Banned User
Posts: 772
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 23, 2007

 

Post#2 » by Agent0 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:31 am

no.
Cevap
Banned User
Posts: 2,594
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 11, 2007

 

Post#3 » by Cevap » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:33 am

do you post a thread on every random stat the announcers talk about?
Jemini80
Banned User
Posts: 6,437
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 29, 2007

 

Post#4 » by Jemini80 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:44 am

the knicks play everyone because everyone is equally as bad.
User avatar
BirdIsDaKing
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,497
And1: 320
Joined: Jul 09, 2005

Re: Largest Rotation? 

Post#5 » by BirdIsDaKing » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:13 am

Taiwan Killa wrote:What's the largest rotation of players in recent league history? I thought of this because the Lakers have a 10 man rotation and that's not even including Bynum and Ariza who will get minutes.

Has there been any larger rotations in recent memory?


2000 Blazers
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,011
And1: 18,086
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#6 » by NO-KG-AI » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:18 am

Cevap wrote:do you post a thread on every random stat the announcers talk about?


And also passes it off as his observation.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Taiwan Killa
Banned User
Posts: 1,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2007

 

Post#7 » by Taiwan Killa » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:38 am

NO-KG-AI wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



And also passes it off as his observation.


No. I'm a Laker fan so I've known for a while we have a large rotation. If anything I got this idea from the Lakers commentators saying this before. Today just reminded me. I'm sorry I couldn't think of an original topic.

But back on topic. Has there ever been a team with a rotation with this many people?

I mean sure more players are fresh but there aren't enough minutes to get people in a rhythm. Has it ever worked for any team in the playoffs?
NY MAVURS
Freshman
Posts: 52
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 13, 2007

 

Post#8 » by NY MAVURS » Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:05 am

right now its the Spurs:

PG: Parker/Vaughn/Stoudemire
SG: Finley/Ginobili
SF:Bowen/Udoka
PF:Duncan/Horry
C:Oberto/K. Thomas

When healthy the Lakers will be up there too
User avatar
ilikecb4
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,467
And1: 4
Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Location: Somewhere is the Sea of Red

 

Post#9 » by ilikecb4 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:06 am

KNICKS>..they all suck equally..
Taiwan Killa
Banned User
Posts: 1,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2007

 

Post#10 » by Taiwan Killa » Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:08 am

NY MAVURS wrote:right now its the Spurs:

PG: Parker/Vaughn/Stoudemire
SG: Finley/Ginobili
SF:Bowen/Udoka
PF:Duncan/Horry
C:Oberto/K. Thomas

When healthy the Lakers will be up there too


It seems like the Spurs don't play horry that much though. Also do Vaughn and Damon get that much time behind Parker? Otherwise that's probably the deeper than the Lakers.
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#11 » by farzi » Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:10 am

You already got answered, the 2000 Trailblazers.

Actually, 2001 was bigger, since in 2000 O'neal didn't play much, but in 2001 they had Dale Davis instead of Sabonis, and Shawn Kemp instead of O'neal, both of which played regular minutes
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
Taiwan Killa
Banned User
Posts: 1,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2007

 

Post#12 » by Taiwan Killa » Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:24 am

farzi wrote:You already got answered, the 2000 Trailblazers.

Actually, 2001 was bigger, since in 2000 O'neal didn't play much, but in 2001 they had Dale Davis instead of Sabonis, and Shawn Kemp instead of O'neal, both of which played regular minutes


Where can I see a depth chart and minutes played?
CupcakeNoFillin
Banned User
Posts: 1,383
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 07, 2007

 

Post#13 » by CupcakeNoFillin » Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:24 am

The Utah Jazz whenever they play the Warriors. It's like a giant gangbang on Golden State.
User avatar
lukeridenour
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,263
And1: 1
Joined: May 19, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#14 » by lukeridenour » Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:55 am

Taiwan Killa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Where can I see a depth chart and minutes played?


not sure where you can find that but that was definitely one of the deepest teams ever (arguably). they had 9 different players lead the team in 9 different positive statiscal categories.

gonna need help here but:
Starting Lineup:
Dale Davis
Rasheed Wallace
Scottie Pippen
Steve Smith
Damon Stoudemire
Bench:
Bonzi Wells
Arvydas Sabonis
Shawn Kemp
Detlef Schrempf
Rod Strickland
Stacey Augmon

i believe all of them averaged at least 1 quarter of playing time.
Patterns
Banned User
Posts: 6,008
And1: 18
Joined: Sep 19, 2007

 

Post#15 » by Patterns » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:02 am

That 11-deep team got beat by 2 players. I'll let you guess who. :wink:
User avatar
lukeridenour
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,263
And1: 1
Joined: May 19, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#16 » by lukeridenour » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:11 am

Patterns wrote:That 11-deep team got beat by 2 players. I'll let you guess who. :wink:


great point, just because you have a deep or "large" rotation doesnt mean ****. its about chemistry and experience, the team with the most experience to go along with strong chemistry is.. i'll let you guess.
Chubby Chaser
Banned User
Posts: 2,744
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 20, 2005
Location: California

 

Post#17 » by Chubby Chaser » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:54 am

Jailblazers. I remember the LA Times headline read

2 deep vs Too Deep

Implying the great depth of the jailblazers in comparison the 2 deep of kobe n Shaq
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#18 » by farzi » Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:58 am

Taiwan Killa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Where can I see a depth chart and minutes played?


99/00
http://www.nba.com/blazers/stats/1999/index.html

00/01
http://www.nba.com/blazers/stats/1999/index.html

The 00/01 team played 12 deep
Minutes Per game
Wallace 38
Pippen 33
Staudamire 32
Smith 31
Wells 26
Davis 26
Sabonis 21
Augmon
Rod Strickland 16 (Portland had far and away the best record in the league until they resigned Rod)
Anthony 16
Kemp 16
Schrempf 15

The team had bad chemistry because they were too deep. Everyone wanted more minutes. Got Dunleavey in trouble, despite doing about as good of a job as anyone could have given the situation.
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#19 » by farzi » Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:45 pm

Do I win?
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
User avatar
KB20
Head Coach
Posts: 6,191
And1: 4
Joined: Nov 27, 2004
       

 

Post#20 » by KB20 » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:13 am

Lakers depth when we're healthy:

5) Andrew Bynum/Pau Gasol/Ronny Turiaf
4) Pau Gasol/Lamar Odom/Ronny Turiaf/Vladimir Radmanovic
3) Lamar Odom/Trevor Ariza/Vladimir Radmanovic/Luke Walton
2) Kobe Bryant/Sasha Vujacic/Trevor Ariza
1) Derek Fisher/Jordan Farmar/Sasha Vujacic
Image

Return to The General Board