Page 1 of 1

which streaks ends first?

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:42 am
by spaldingtattoos
Miami Heat's current losing streak (11 straight) or Rockets' winning streak also at 11 straight? Both are longest current streaks.

Heat's next 5 opponents are:

Sacramento
LA Lakers
Seattle
Sacramento
Toronto

Rockets' next 5:

Chicago
Washington
Memphis
Denver
Indiana

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:45 am
by RoxFan08
Its definitely easier to lose than to win. My guess is the Rockets drop 1 of the next three games, get angry, then blow Denver out on Saturday and get another streak going.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:47 am
by kobe#8
wow the rocks can make it 16 a row but they will lose against the nuggs

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:48 am
by jzmagik
It's more likely the Rockets will lose one than the Heat winning one.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:51 am
by magicfan04
i say the heat beat seattle and the rockets lose to denver

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:54 am
by spaldingtattoos
The Heat should pick up one of the games against the Kings and the game against Seattle is definitely winnable for 'em. Heat just got nipped in a OT game tonite, damn.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:55 am
by Suns_Fever
i say rockets go on a 25 game winning streak

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:08 am
by canoner
I can see Heat lossing every single game for the rest of the season. That streak is hard to beat.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:17 am
by INKtastic
It's kind of surprising that the heat still can't win a game after picking up Marion. I remember after the trade some thought they could still make a playoff run. I thought they were too far down for that, but thought they'd at least be respectable.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:47 am
by KF10
Heat beat Kings? At Arco? I very doubt the Kings would lose to a team like the Heat...True, we have a problem of playing to the level of a opponent (playing a bad team at a bad level)...I dont see it...

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:52 am
by KF10
[quote="

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:39 am
by Taiwan Killa
I guarentee a Heat win over the Sonics.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:55 am
by lukeridenour
i say the rockets, theyre looking great but i feel they took a small step back in terms of bench depth and chemistry with their trade (unless their rookies maintain consistency for the rest of the season.).

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:52 am
by Tom Baker
lj4mvp wrote:It's kind of surprising that the heat still can't win a game after picking up Marion. I remember after the trade some thought they could still make a playoff run. I thought they were too far down for that, but thought they'd at least be respectable.


Marion can't turn a team around by himself. He certainly can't make the team that's dead last in the league "respectable" by himself. God, as I type this, Miami's batting .170.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 12:52 pm
by Uncooked
Tom Baker wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Marion can't turn a team around by himself. He certainly can't make the team that's dead last in the league "respectable" by himself. God, as I type this, Miami's batting .170.


What the hell happened to Wade? He is playing well as of late, I would think he could get the team to .500 by himself, are we beginning to see how important Shaq was for that team's previous success?

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:04 pm
by Shabi__5
lukeridenour wrote:i say the rockets, theyre looking great but i feel they took a small step back in terms of bench depth and chemistry with their trade (unless their rookies maintain consistency for the rest of the season.).


I don't think we lost depth , we beat NO just now without Bonzi and the 2 games before that.
IMO backup pg is more important than backup wing , especially when Alston is such a streaky shooter.
Bonzi was great one game and poor the next 3 , if we can get Barry imo we are a better team than we were.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:34 am
by Jaykoolzboy
Miami