Page 1 of 1

Hollinger on suns

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 9:07 pm
by INKtastic
I didn't see a thread on this

the article opens with this

"If it works, I'm a genius. If it doesn't, I'm a moron, I guess." -- Steve Kerr

and closes with this

"The stated purpose was to help the Suns once they got to the postseason, but nobody ever considered that it might prevent them from getting there."

and has some interesting points along the way - the whole thing is here - free insider preview

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insider/ ... uns-080307

so which is it, are the suns post trade struggles a transitional period that will work itself out, or are they showing, like many thought at the time, that the trade was doomed from the start.

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 9:11 pm
by conleyorbust
Really good read. He makes a good point about pace in the playoffs. I like where he says that the Suns don't lose because teams play slower, they lose because the play teams that are better than them.

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 9:11 pm
by thamadkant
Pretty much what I was scared of.

The trigger to the trade was when the Spurs beat the Suns in a slow tempo game without Parker, scores were 87-85 I think.

Basically, the thought of Shaq getting doubled and then finding the open cutter or shooter in a slow down offense came to his mind.

But now, teams are out running the Suns to beat them... its ironic in a way.

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 9:13 pm
by shobe_81
thamadkant wrote:Pretty much what I was scared of.

The trigger to the trade was when the Spurs beat the Suns in a slow tempo game without Parker, scores were 87-85 I think.

Basically, the thought of Shaq getting doubled and then finding the open cutter or shooter in a slow down offense came to his mind.

But now, teams are out running the Suns to beat them... its ironic in a way.


Exactly, but teams don't necessarily have to play slow in the playoffs to attact your defense!

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 10:05 pm
by xcomputerman
I think it's rather mind-boggling to think that the Suns front office actually made the common mistake of equating pace factor with defense, and ended up making a huge personnel decision on that basis.

I read that article earlier today. Hollinger really tore Steve Kerr a new one.

"Theory: The Suns will be better once they stop committing turnovers."
"Reality: The Suns are committing turnovers because they traded for them."

"Theory: The Suns can still run with Shaq."
"Reality: Opposing teams can run on Shaq."

"Theory: We can't truly gauge this trade until the playoffs."
"Reality: The Suns might not even make the playoffs."

Ouch.

One more thing: can you believe that Marion averaged a +/- of more than +10 over the past 3 1/2 years on a team with Nash and Amare? That is just amazing, regardless of what you think about the +/- stat.

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 10:15 pm
by Milan24

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 10:58 pm
by xcomputerman
Milan24 wrote:

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 11:03 pm
by BooRadley
Suns have already gotten 3-4 games closer to the 9th seed since the trade. And there's around 20 games left. They could easily lose 4 more games than Denver and GS. They have 2 games left against GS and Denver. Very real possibility they miss the playoffs. Who knows what they do in the offseason if that happens.

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 11:08 pm
by NetsForce
The Suns should trade for Juwan Howard he'd improve their defense at the PF position :blank:

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 11:33 pm
by Milan24
xcomputerman wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



OT ... your avatar rocks. And no, I'm not an AC Milan fan (go Gunners!).

Thanks man. BTW, Milan must of been tired of winning the CL so they decided to let the kids have a chance to win it for once. :wink: :lol:

Posted: Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:24 am
by magicfan4life05
Milan24 wrote:

Posted: Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:59 am
by INKtastic
it does, doesn't it? Go from talk of championships to talking about there being too much competition to even make the playoffs in just a couple of weeks. There were those same 9 teams a few weeks ago when the trade was made, right?

Posted: Sat Mar 8, 2008 1:17 am
by dockingsched
great read.