I gotta tell you folks....
Something seemed very fishy here. I told my friend this about 5 days ago. I look at the schedule religiously and I asked him the following:
WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME TNT HAD A Tuesday night game on a NON holiday and how many times does it air just ONE GAME.
The answer: It hasnt happened in basically 5 years. It's not like there havent been other great games.
What this told me is this:
The lakers were destined to lose. I actually GUARANTEED my friend, the lakers would lose at the minimum because of this.
But, I guarantee Boston beats them on Tuesday also on TNT in that single game.
Im telling you, TNT hasn't had a ONE GAME night on any night in about how many years? Not since they signed over that exclusive Thursday night deal.
The only time that TNT has games outside of Thursday are holidays when they are back to back or tripleheaders and playoffs.
This one Boston vs. Houston TNT game reeks of a setup.
How would that game look if Houston went in coming off a loss?
Not very good huh.
Like I said, it was a setup by the league and the officiating today proves it.
However, don't be surprised if the league rigs it so Boston and the Lakers meet in the finals also with Boston winning.
When you watch enough of this ****, you see the trends.
I GUARANTEE YOU WITH EVERYTHING THAT IS HOLY, taht Boston beats Houston on TNT on Tuesday.
TNT Tuesday: Single Game - Boston vs. Houston - HUH??
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
TNT Tuesday: Single Game - Boston vs. Houston - HUH??
-
JDawg
- Banned User
- Posts: 766
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 13, 2008
-
SOUL
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,718
- And1: 40,750
- Joined: Dec 11, 2006
- Location: █████████████
-
Yeah.. and Stern hurt Pau's ankle. If you replay it closely you can see him run out onto the court and put his foot in front of him.
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
-
exkonvict
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,251
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 02, 2006
- Location: The OC, California
- Contact:
-
carrottop12
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,602
- And1: 30
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: why you take out my sig for?
-
jaymeister15
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,965
- And1: 1,072
- Joined: Dec 30, 2003
- Location: Ontario
-
JDawg
- Banned User
- Posts: 766
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 13, 2008
This game was added to TNT about 1 week ago folks.
Take the blinders off. TNT never does games out the blue like this.
You think this is the only big game that has happened in the last five years. So why NOW???
Ah...yes....thats right...because Houston has won 22 in a row right?
But the league didnt know they would ahve won 22 in a row a week ago with 3 games to play, did they??
WITH or WITHOUT Pau, the lakers were NOT winning this game tonight.
Boston, however, is a surefire LOCK to win on Tuesday. It's the way the league does things.
And I fully expect some bogus calls the Lakers way as they make it to the Finals to play the Celtics. Its just the way it is. The league makes more moeny and cannot afford another dud of a finals.
Its all about money folks. Take the blinders off.
Take the blinders off. TNT never does games out the blue like this.
You think this is the only big game that has happened in the last five years. So why NOW???
Ah...yes....thats right...because Houston has won 22 in a row right?
But the league didnt know they would ahve won 22 in a row a week ago with 3 games to play, did they??
WITH or WITHOUT Pau, the lakers were NOT winning this game tonight.
Boston, however, is a surefire LOCK to win on Tuesday. It's the way the league does things.
And I fully expect some bogus calls the Lakers way as they make it to the Finals to play the Celtics. Its just the way it is. The league makes more moeny and cannot afford another dud of a finals.
Its all about money folks. Take the blinders off.
-
Harry Palmer
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 42,630
- And1: 5,958
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
- Location: It’s all a bit vague.
This is what happens when you start with a conclusion and go from there.
If you start out thinking ____ is a fact, then when people don't agree with you, they must have some problems, and when things don't go as you expect them to, you need to really dig for answers.
So when you start out, say, thinking Kobe is the best and can't fail, and then he gets bested and fails, you need to really dig for an answer, and the refs/league conspiracy is the one this guy chose.
But I have to admit, a Kobe fan complaining about officiating, as often as it happens, is still good for a laugh for me. It's like a Yao fan complaining about the unfair advantage of height in basketball.
If you start out thinking ____ is a fact, then when people don't agree with you, they must have some problems, and when things don't go as you expect them to, you need to really dig for answers.
So when you start out, say, thinking Kobe is the best and can't fail, and then he gets bested and fails, you need to really dig for an answer, and the refs/league conspiracy is the one this guy chose.
But I have to admit, a Kobe fan complaining about officiating, as often as it happens, is still good for a laugh for me. It's like a Yao fan complaining about the unfair advantage of height in basketball.
-
JDawg
- Banned User
- Posts: 766
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 13, 2008
Anyway, IM just the idiot who cried wolf here. Thats fine.
I have no idea what im saying.
I can fully understand why everyone who reads this must think I've lost my mind. NOt a big deal.
But, trust this. When the Lakers meet the Celtics in the finals and along the way you guys CANT BELIEVE the calls the lakers were getting, you'll remember JDawg todl you so.
I have no idea what im saying.
I can fully understand why everyone who reads this must think I've lost my mind. NOt a big deal.
But, trust this. When the Lakers meet the Celtics in the finals and along the way you guys CANT BELIEVE the calls the lakers were getting, you'll remember JDawg todl you so.