Page 1 of 5
Bogut high-fiving by himself
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:17 pm
by Serge28
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:25 pm
by Optimus_Steel
Wow thats freaking hilarious.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:34 pm
by Agent0
haha his teammates are too lazy
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:38 pm
by SugarRay34
Just shows what great chemistry we have on this team. Everyone is all about themselves. Bogut is the only one that gives a damn about anything to be honest.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:08 pm
by thamadkant
Seriously...
They need get rid of Redd and Williams ASAP. Build around Bogut, Yi and Villanueva. They need an Andre Miller type.. but he is doing great for the Sixers.
I'd trade Redd to a playoff team or a team on the brink... then trade Mo Williams for a lottery pick and future picks.
Bogut is atleast a 18/10 player if he is a second option... and a potential 22/10 if the offense is build around him... he isnt Duncan.. but he is a very smart and skilled big man who relies a lot on his fundamentals.
Yi will only explode when he gets a lot of touches, plays..
Villanueva is that athletic 3/4 guy who will play a role very well.
Need a shooter who doesnt take most of the shots.. and a pass first player who plays D at the pg.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:11 pm
by Harry Palmer
CV? He has some offensive ability, but he couldn't even defend the guys Bogut was high-fiving.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:13 pm
by Optimus_Steel
Harry Palmer wrote:CV? He has some offensive ability, but he couldn't even defend the guys Bogut was high-fiving.
Awesome comedy. I chuckled when he included CV as one of the guys to build around.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:16 pm
by Pats19andO
Bahahahaha
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:34 pm
by gonnadunkonU
Gotta love Bogut's sense of humor.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:34 pm
by SugarRay34
I used to be the biggest CV supporter on this entire board I think but after watching him this whole year and realizing how bad his defense really is I cant see him being a focal point of anybodys team. He still can be a great rebounder though. He has put up some very good numbers when given the chance over the past month but he seriously is the worst defender maybe in the whole NBA. As for Bogut no doubt in my mind if the offense is ran through him he can be a 22/11 type of guy. Instead the Bucks have 2 selfish chuckers in their backcourt that need to go ASAP
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:35 pm
by bryant08
LOL!
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:41 pm
by Pai Gow
Poor Bogut, if they would just utilize him correctly, guy could easily average 20 and 10 in this league, its really a shame actually.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:51 pm
by NetsForce
I don't understand why Bogut doesn't get more touches / plays run for him...
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:26 pm
by G35
That was awesome, subtly calling out his teammates......
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:30 pm
by prototype
I thought Mo Williams was loved by the Bucks fans. Weren't they hailing him as a future all star in the beginning of the season? LOL.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:31 pm
by hermes
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:33 pm
by magicfan4life05
G35 wrote:That was awesome, subtly calling out his teammates......
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:34 pm
by Harry Palmer
I'm by no means anti-Bogut...I would love for the Raps to get him...but how would his being used differently make him a better rebounder? Scoring I get, and I think he could be a pretty good one, especially given his passing ability (he would be awesome in an Adleman or Princetone type of offense..even UCLA) but I don't see how his not being enough of a focal point detracts from his rebounding.
No offense, but that smacks a little of the standard fan's out, ie it can't be the players we are building around/love, so it must be the coach.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:59 pm
by Schad
Harry Palmer wrote:I'm by no means anti-Bogut...I would love for the Raps to get him...but how would his being used differently make him a better rebounder? Scoring I get, and I think he could be a pretty good one, especially given his passing ability (he would be awesome in an Adleman or Princetone type of offense..even UCLA) but I don't see how his not being enough of a focal point detracts from his rebounding.
No offense, but that smacks a little of the standard fan's out, ie it can't be the players we are building around/love, so it must be the coach.
He's already pulling down 9.5 a game in 34.5 mpg...an extra 1.8 minutes a game and he's at 10 (which is what most people are suggesting he can accomplish).
Also, stick him on a team that isn't in the bottom third in pace, and it's not out of the question that he could get to 10.5-10.8 a game.
Edited to clarify: the extra mpg is relevant because the suggestion is that he could reach 10 rpg if he was the focal point of the offense. If that were the case, it would seem logical that he would be higher than third in minutes played, which is where he sits on the Bucks.
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:55 am
by skones
Schadenfreude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
He's already pulling down 9.5 a game in 34.5 mpg...an extra 1.8 minutes a game and he's at 10 (which is what most people are suggesting he can accomplish).
Also, stick him on a team that isn't in the bottom third in pace, and it's not out of the question that he could get to 10.5-10.8 a game.
Edited to clarify: the extra mpg is relevant because the suggestion is that he could reach 10 rpg if he was the focal point of the offense. If that were the case, it would seem logical that he would be higher than third in minutes played, which is where he sits on the Bucks.
I think it's also worth mentioning that if he's getting more touches on the block, he'll be in position for rebounds more often as opposed to setting so many picks.
Also, he's averaging 10.2 rebounds per game since the start of the new year which coincidentally coincides with him suddenly becoming a 16 and 10 guy.
