Page 1 of 1

NBA Expansion...

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:03 am
by SnoBrdrRob
There has been talk recently about the possibility of expansion in the league to 32 total teams. What are some suggestions of cities that are deserving of a new franchise?

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:13 am
by panacea
I wish they'd prioritize relocation.

Re: NBA Expansion...

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:16 am
by ChampionRed
SnoBrdrRob wrote:There has been talk recently about the possibility of expansion in the league to 32 total teams. What are some suggestions of cities that are deserving of a new franchise?


I didn't hear anything about them adding two more teams... Where did you hear this?

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:17 am
by Dtown84
If there was absolutely no way to avoid expansion (I still say we should contract a couple). Then Seattle, provided they can't find a way to keep the Sonics.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:17 am
by NetsForce
I read a recent article stating that Stern had no intention of expanding the league.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:25 am
by caborn
Virginia/WV? New Mexico?

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:37 am
by panacea
NetsForce wrote:I read a recent article stating that Stern had no intention of expanding the league.


The only expansion I've heard is the long-term plan to expand to Europe.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:47 am
by Klomp
Somewhere in the midwest first of all (Omaha, Kansas City, or St Louis). I'd say either Omaha or KC has priority because of state of the art arenas (Qwest Center and Sprint Center, respectively)



Then, I'm not sure. Pittsburgh?


Does Miami or New York have an NBA team?

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:48 am
by DelaneyRudd
Vegas, KC or Europe. I think there is enough talent for more teams, the issue I have is stretching the schedule too thin. There would be less games against each team per year. Right now they play 4 in conference, except one team is 3 and the opposite conference is 2.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:48 am
by DelaneyRudd
klomp44 wrote:Somewhere in the midwest first of all (Omaha, Kansas City, or St Louis). I'd say either Omaha or KC has priority because of state of the art arenas (Qwest Center and Sprint Center, respectively)



Then, I'm not sure. Pittsburgh?


Does Miami or New York have an NBA team?


You have to look at both TV market and market growth. The mid-west isn't growing like the west and south.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:50 am
by UNLVNugsFan
Seattle, Vancouver, San Diego, Kansas City, Las Vegas.

Pretty much in that order. They really should relocate some franchises first though, before expanding.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:53 am
by DelaneyRudd
UNLVNugsFan wrote:Seattle, Vancouver, San Diego, Kansas City, Las Vegas.

Pretty much in that order. They really should relocate some franchises first though, before expanding.
Relocate the Clippers and Nets (away from NY)

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:09 am
by Blame Rasho
I don't like the idea of expansion.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:19 am
by Mapelgleaf
I read somewhere of like adding a new Seattle Sonics team (after the other team moved to OKC) and maybe like a Vegas team. The league would then move 2 teams to the East (Memphis & Minnesota would be ideal candidates).

32 is a good number... after that though it's time to go to Europe.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:17 pm
by Napoleon7
Las Vegas & Vancouver, BC

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:27 pm
by GJense4181
I don't think the European *expansion* would be the same league.
The Phoenix Suns aren't going to play the London Knights, for example. It'd likely be an 8-team league of its own, and not a 7th division of the National Basketball Association.