wizards win three of four games vs Boston

Basileus777 · Post #21 » by **Basileus777** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:10 am

Texas Longhorns wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I don't agree with that. I think you guys are 4th at best. Orlando is still a better team IMO.

Fixed your post.

TheKingOfVa360 · Post #22 » by **TheKingOfVa360** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:23 am

Texas Longhorns wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I don't agree with that. I think you guys are 4th at best. Cleveland is still a better team IMO.

Now if you said the Magic I might agree with you but the Cavs I can't agree with that

B Calrissian · Post #23 » by **B Calrissian** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:24 am

AgEnT50 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Lobbying for awards at an all time low.. :nonono:

Texas Longhorns · Post #24 » by **Texas Longhorns** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:26 am

TheKingOfVa360 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Now if you said the Magic I might agree with you but the Cavs I can't agree with that

I'm sorry, I meant to say Orlando. I don't know what went through my head when I typed Cleveland.

MagicNolesFSU · Post #25 » by **MagicNolesFSU** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:31 am

This Haywood madness is getting out of control. Hes long and and has some strength. But lets be real Haywood is the D12 stopper like Rueban Patterson was the Kobe stopper.

JWizmentality · Post #26 » by **JWizmentality** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:44 am

MagicNolesFSU wrote:This Haywood madness is getting out of control. Hes long and and has some strength. But lets be real Haywood is the D12 stopper like Rueban Patterson was the Kobe stopper.

What madness?? Only Magic fans seem to be steamed about it.

Hypz · Post #27 » by **Hypz** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:53 am

Props to Wizards. They have had the Celt's number this season.

Celtsfan1980 · Post #28 » by **Celtsfan1980** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 12:12 pm

The Celtics won the first game by 20. The Celtics lost to the Bobcats, struggled against the Nets, and then lost to the Wizards two straight games. They were playing lousy basketball at that time. They're not playing for anything at the moment and the Wizards are. The last meaningful games they played were at home against the Hornets and Suns, and they won by 20. That's the Celtics team I expect to see in the playoffs. I'm more worried about Lebron than I am about the Wizards, so I still feel the Celtics are capable of sweeping the Wizards.

carlos1223 · Post #29 » by **carlos1223** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 12:51 pm

typical celticsfan. Having excuses ready and whatnot.i bet they would call this a trap game huh? They havent proven themselves yet and the fact that their stadium was practically empty last year, while now they sellout every game just didsgust me. Oh well..thats Boston for you. Bunch of bandwaggoners

MagicalMan · Post #30 » by **MagicalMan** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:19 pm

SE division > Celts

Wiz won 3 of 4, Magic won 2 of 3.

Just ignore the rest of the division though

AWalkerREMIX · Post #31 » by **AWalkerREMIX** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:34 pm

The Cavs swept the Spurs in the regular season last year. It didn't matter in the playoffs and this won't either.

Wizardspride · Post #32 » by **Wizardspride** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:38 pm

Celtsfan1980 wrote:The Celtics won the first game by 20. The Celtics lost to the Bobcats, struggled against the Nets, and then lost to the Wizards two straight games. They were playing lousy basketball at that time.

And when the Celtics beat the Wiz by 20 we were playing
lousy ball. We started off the season 0-5.......

Wizardspride · Post #33 » by **Wizardspride** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:40 pm

MagicalMan wrote:SE division > Celts

Wiz won 3 of 4, Magic won 2 of 3.

Just ignore the rest of the division though

Post #34 » by **CBS7** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:47 pm

I think this is more like Chicago winning 3/4 vs Detroit last year then GS winning 3/4 vs Dallas.

Wizardspride · Post #35 » by **Wizardspride** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:53 pm

CBS7 wrote:I think this is more like Chicago winning 3/4 vs Detroit last year then GS winning 3/4 vs Dallas.

It's quite possible you are right. Only time will tell.

Post #36 » by **miller31time** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:57 pm

CBS7 wrote:I think this is more like Chicago winning 3/4 vs Detroit last year then GS winning 3/4 vs Dallas.

I think that's a more apt comparison.

Celtsfan1980 · Post #37 » by **Celtsfan1980** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:00 pm

carlos1223 wrote:typical celticsfan. Having excuses ready and whatnot.i bet they would call this a trap game huh? They havent proven themselves yet and the fact that their stadium was practically empty last year, while now they sellout every game just didsgust me. Oh well..thats Boston for you. Bunch of bandwaggoners

I have been a fan for the most part since Bird left and some of the last years he was playing. They averaged 16,600 last season according to an article I read, so they can still get attendance even in a season they were terrible. The Celtics realgm board had more posts than most other teams in a year they were terrible. Every team has some fans like that, but Celtics fans as a whole would be considered much more loyal than most other fan bases.

Gordon Bombay · Post #38 » by **Gordon Bombay** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:02 pm

carlos1223 wrote:typical celticsfan. Having excuses ready and whatnot.i bet they would call this a trap game huh? They havent proven themselves yet and the fact that their stadium was practically empty last year, while now they sellout every game just didsgust me. Oh well..thats Boston for you. Bunch of bandwaggoners

you always come off as the bigger person when calling the other a bandwagon fan :roll: