greenbeans wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
enjoy the s***-talking that comes with the playoffs. youve only got about a week and a half left to partake.
I will, and I agree with that..
and IIII value his opinion
Wow.
Moderators: KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37
High 5 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
You're obviously a real tough guy talking **** and crunching numbers over the internet. Still mad that your last chance at a championship left for Atlanta a few years ago?
I love how people feel like they're better than someone because of the team they choose to cheer for. Anyone can be a fan of any team.
JoshB914 wrote:So? The Warriors are better than the Hawks. Are you attempting to make a relevant point here?
Once again, the Warriors are far better than almost anyy eight seed ever was, and if you don't realize that then you just don't know much about basketball. If you hold number 8 seeds to that standard then there is really nothing I can tell you.
NDaATL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Why are you in here bashing the Hawks? Just shutup and leave, your opinion means absolutely nothing to any Hawks or Celtics fans..
b-ball forever wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Yeah, I'll def be behind u guys all the way fo sho bro.
Not just in this thread BTW, thru-out yer whole east run and maybe even in the finals as well.
JoshB914 wrote:You just don't get it. There is a difference between a team with a .500 record and a team playing .500 basketball. We have been playing .500 basketball ever since we got Bibby. T
his is very easy to understand, as many teams play at levels different than their overall record in the playoffs because of trades/injuries/chemistry etc. Did I really have to explain that fundamental fact? I have gotten dumber trying to explain this very basic element of sports to you.
If the C's lost KG/Pierce/Allen before the playoffs are they still the caliber of a 66 win team heading into the postseason? Because that is what you are saying: that regular season record indicates what kind of a team you are no matter what the circumstances may be. The Warriors from last year might have something to say about that.
Enjoy the off season!
b-ball forever wrote:Oh wowzers, so 1 of the games the Hawks lost came against the Celts... what exactly is the excuse of a factor that was supposed to change the outcome of that game? U seriously think that u guys were gonna beat Orlando, the Celts, and the Heat for sure if the playoffs weren't wrapped up yet?
LMAO : "We were a .500 team with him and maybe a bit better and anyone will tell you that".
Wrong choice of words, "Anyone" does not equate to Hawks homers.
15-17 in the Bibby Era it was,
15 divided by (15+17) = .468, NOT "above .500 basketball", 1 + 1 = 2, and 4 + 0 = sweep
So yes, u do suck at math, and that is tarded reasoning.
b-ball forever wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Same team as BJ. "Officially" he got banned for sum ish on the OT board, apparantly.
Dude's a mod on his own OT board now
greenbeans wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
ahhh. . doesnt surprise me. look forward to seein you guys in the finals. hopefully Nash will have some Motrin ready for them ankles