why would the Knicks want Karl?

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

BRINGTHEPAIN
Banned User
Posts: 823
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 16, 2008

why would the Knicks want Karl? 

Post#1 » by BRINGTHEPAIN » Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:04 am

It is rumored they would like Karl.

It may be a false rumor but the Knicks need a coach who stresses d-fense. I wish they would hire a guy like JVG (although someone else since he isn't interested in coaching the Knicks), maybe Mike Fratello? and re-shape their roster to be built like the 90s Knicks. Play slow half-court with bruisers at the 5, 4 and 3 and good trey-shooters elsewhere. George Karl is one of the last coaches I would hire. I also wouldn't hire Mark Jackson as he is too unproven, and its not a time to experiment if you are the Knicks.
User avatar
Teen Girl Squad
Head Coach
Posts: 7,044
And1: 3,191
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Location: Southern California
       

 

Post#2 » by Teen Girl Squad » Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:32 am

Because Karl is a good defensive coach? Just because he's stuck with two negative defensive presences in Melo and AI doesn't mean he doesn't preach it. The nuggets are just selfish and immature. Karl isn't an elite coach but he's a good one.
Image
Balls
Banned User
Posts: 461
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 21, 2004

 

Post#3 » by Balls » Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:58 am

I thought this thread was about Coby Karl.
Karl would be a great starter for the Knicks.
Image
User avatar
BirdIsDaKing
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,497
And1: 320
Joined: Jul 09, 2005

Re: why would the Knicks want Karl? 

Post#4 » by BirdIsDaKing » Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:02 am

BRINGTHEPAIN wrote:It is rumored they would like Karl.

It may be a false rumor but the Knicks need a coach who stresses d-fense. I wish they would hire a guy like JVG (although someone else since he isn't interested in coaching the Knicks), maybe Mike Fratello? and re-shape their roster to be built like the 90s Knicks. Play slow half-court with bruisers at the 5, 4 and 3 and good trey-shooters elsewhere. George Karl is one of the last coaches I would hire. I also wouldn't hire Mark Jackson as he is too unproven, and its not a time to experiment if you are the Knicks.


I gotta question for you, when did you start watching basketball?

If George Karl has the right team (ahem 90s Seattle Supersonics) he can do a lot.

And you talk about the 90s Knicks....the 1996 Seattle Supersonics were just like that aswell, so gtfo.
Image

We still won more games than the 72 dolphins.....
User avatar
caborn
Junior
Posts: 383
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 27, 2007

 

Post#5 » by caborn » Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:37 am

I think he's a good coach. He works well with players, so I think he'd work well with a developing team.
downundernugget
Junior
Posts: 420
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 22, 2005

 

Post#6 » by downundernugget » Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:55 am

lol you can have him. He is a joke of a coach. Has the players respect for one season and then loses control
Duiz
Banned User
Posts: 10,714
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 06, 2007
Location: Chaine Wasatch, Occident des Etats-Unis

 

Post#7 » by Duiz » Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:05 am

Balls wrote:I thought this thread was about Coby Karl.
Karl would be a great starter for the Knicks.
(picture)


He can't be any worse than Crawford.
BRINGTHEPAIN
Banned User
Posts: 823
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 16, 2008

Re: why would the Knicks want Karl? 

Post#8 » by BRINGTHEPAIN » Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:56 am

BirdIsDaKing wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I gotta question for you, when did you start watching basketball?

If George Karl has the right team (ahem 90s Seattle Supersonics) he can do a lot.

And you talk about the 90s Knicks....the 1996 Seattle Supersonics were just like that aswell, so gtfo.


Mid-80s.

I wouldn't say the 90sSonics played a similar offense to the 90sKnicks. The Knicks were more halfcourt. The Sonics ran a lot more with Payton bringing more to the fast-break table than any Knicks PG.

And the Sonics bigmen had more range on their jumpers because you had the great perimeter game of Detlef Schrempf, and you had a player very similar to Amare in Shawn Kemp who really could light it up from 18 feet. And you had spot-up shooting bigmen like Frank Brickowski and Sam Perkins.

The Knicks didn't have bigmen spotting up from downtown (apart from Larry Johnson's occasional long-range launches though that wasn't his strength). The Knicks were reliant on Ewing mostly in the post (though a good mid-range game) and a host of bruisers at the 3 and 4 living in the post.

I don't think of 90sSonics when I think of 90sKnicks at all.

The Sonics had good defense, but I think that had more to do with Payton who is one of the greatest defensive players in NBA history, top 15 at least. I think the Nuggest have more defensive capabilities than what we are seeing. A coach like Jeff Van Gundy would definitely see those capabilities.
That Nicka
Banned User
Posts: 15,350
And1: 34
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: USC

 

Post#9 » by That Nicka » Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:57 am

Teen Girl Squad wrote:Because Karl is a good defensive coach? Just because he's stuck with two negative defensive presences in Melo and AI doesn't mean he doesn't preach it. The nuggets are just selfish and immature. Karl isn't an elite coach but he's a good one.


George Karl has under-achieved at every placed he's coached
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,541
And1: 9,469
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

 

Post#10 » by DelaneyRudd » Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:39 am

Just what the Knicks need, another big ego, high maintenance, recycled coach.
User avatar
gavran
RealGM
Posts: 18,230
And1: 8,978
Joined: Nov 02, 2005
Location: crossing the line

 

Post#11 » by gavran » Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:33 am

They don't.

Return to The General Board