Page 1 of 2
PER Leaders Playoffs (1st Round)
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 1:20 pm
by JordansBulls
PER Leaders Playoffs
1 Chris Paul, NOR 5 31.96
2 LeBron James, CLE 6 29.40
3 Kobe Bryant, LAL 4 27.93
4 Dwight Howard, ORL 5 27.93
5 Tony Parker, SAS 5 26.59
6 Dirk Nowitzki, DAL 5 26.01
7 Tim Duncan, SAS 5 25.89
8 Pau Gasol, LAL 4 24.23
9 Tracy McGrady, HOU 6 24.09
10 Kevin Garnett, BOS 6 23.70
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 2:50 pm
by RoxFan08
Nice work by Tony Parker. He's having a monster playoffs.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:02 pm
by hermes
no surprise paul is way ahead
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:05 pm
by dacher
#6 #9 are out
#10 pushed to game 7
Luke @ #11
Nash #47 = Suns ftl
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:08 pm
by dockingsched
the kobe effect in full force with pau at 8 and luke at 11.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:55 pm
by Blame Rasho
Paul was beastly vs the Mavs...
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 5:09 pm
by BROWN
No hawks in the top 10. wow
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 5:28 pm
by Basileus777
brownwarriors wrote:No hawks in the top 10. wow
Bad performances in Boston probably killed their #s.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:13 pm
by That Nicka
LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKEE
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:19 pm
by 2poor
JR Smith at #14 was Denver's highest PER. Speaks volumes.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:31 pm
by ILikeTheGrizz
dcash4 wrote:the kobe effect in full force with pau at 8 and luke at 11.
?? Is it the David West effect that has Chris Paul first?
Anyway, nice list. Funny how the top performers in PER and who we observe as the best performers in the first round are nothing alike, because PER is a crappy stat. Oh wait...
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:33 pm
by dockingsched
ILikeTheGrizz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
?? Is it the David West effect that has Chris Paul first?
Anyway, nice list. Funny how the top performers in PER and who we observe as the best performers in the first round are nothing alike, because PER is a crappy stat. Oh wait...
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:37 pm
by eatyourchildren
ILikeTheGrizz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
?? Is it the David West effect that has Chris Paul first?
Anyway, nice list. Funny how the top performers in PER and who we observe as the best performers in the first round are nothing alike, because PER is a crappy stat. Oh wait...
PER is so good that coaching staffs use it to select their starting lineups Oh wait...
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:42 pm
by ILikeTheGrizz
eatyourchildren wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
PER is so good that coaching staffs use it to select their starting lineups Oh wait...
Nice coherent argument!!!
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:42 pm
by eatyourchildren
BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG (which took years and years of research, trial and error, and multiple rounds of predictive empiricism to develop):
1. Kobe
2. Lebron
3. TP
4. TMac
5. Dirk
6. Timmeh
7. CP
8. AI
9. Bosh
10. Amare
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:44 pm
by ILikeTheGrizz
eatyourchildren wrote:BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG
Unsubscribe. See ya.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:47 pm
by eatyourchildren
Aw, don't run away. Maybe we could debate about appeals to authority again?
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 6:54 pm
by ILikeTheGrizz
LOL or this!
eatyourchildren wrote:BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG
I think I might have a new sig, actually. Or an addition.
Ya know, on another board I frequent there's a usre named "The Idiot Collector". He never posts anything (clearly a someone else) and every once in awhile just quotes someone and says "Collected". If he were here, you'd have been collected by now.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 7:06 pm
by eatyourchildren
ILikeTheGrizz wrote:LOL or this!
-= original quote snipped =-
I think I might have a new sig, actually. Or an addition.
Ya know, on another board I frequent there's a usre named "The Idiot Collector". He never posts anything (clearly a someone else) and every once in awhile just quotes someone and says "Collected". If he were here, you'd have been collected by now.
Thanks for catching the facetiousness of my argument. Btw, you inspired me for my new sig, too.
I thought you unsubscribed me?
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 7:07 pm
by ILikeTheGrizz
It's jsut a clever way to say "That was idiotic". You didn't know that? Anyway, tell us more about how PER and PPG are equal in value, I'm dying to hear.