Why are role players in todays nba so bad?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

DDV
General Manager
Posts: 9,244
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2005

Why are role players in todays nba so bad? 

Post#1 » by DDV » Sun May 18, 2008 8:10 pm

back in the day even if u were a 9th or 10th man u had to have some ability to shoot or putt he ball in the basket

in todays game theres too many "defensive specialists" who cant hit layups and are there just to hustle

in todays game with so many teams and the cap where u can only have one or at most two starstheres too many of these players who have no ability to score that u can just double the teams star and leave the guy wide open because u know he cant hurt you..
nitetrain8603
RealGM
Posts: 24,129
And1: 1,831
Joined: May 30, 2003
         

 

Post#2 » by nitetrain8603 » Sun May 18, 2008 8:23 pm

Because coaches don't know how to use their role players effectively or put them in a position to succeed. Teams that do are always the good ones. Lakers, Spurs, Suns, Hornets, Pistons, Warriors.
User avatar
shawngoat23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 287
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

 

Post#3 » by shawngoat23 » Sun May 18, 2008 8:35 pm

Expansion and the increased flux of high schoolers who are drafted for potential rather than their ability to contribute immediately to a team.
penbeast0 wrote:Yes, he did. And as a mod, I can't even put him on ignore . . . sigh.
Profanity
Rookie
Posts: 1,128
And1: 15
Joined: Jun 07, 2004
Location: Barcelona

 

Post#4 » by Profanity » Sun May 18, 2008 8:37 pm

No, it's because almost all today's GM are homos.
They only like freaks with great bodys, great muscles, great athletism... They don't care about talent anymore.
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,893
And1: 13,690
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

 

Post#5 » by sp6r=underrated » Sun May 18, 2008 8:47 pm

Nostalgia
nitetrain8603
RealGM
Posts: 24,129
And1: 1,831
Joined: May 30, 2003
         

 

Post#6 » by nitetrain8603 » Sun May 18, 2008 8:50 pm

shawngoat23 wrote:Expansion and the increased flux of high schoolers who are drafted for potential rather than their ability to contribute immediately to a team.


That's true as well. Many players today are drafted on potential other than actual skill.
DDV
General Manager
Posts: 9,244
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2005

 

Post#7 » by DDV » Sun May 18, 2008 8:53 pm

Profanity wrote:No, it's because almost all today's GM are homos.
They only like freaks with great bodys, great muscles, great athletism... They don't care about talent anymore.


yeah how many players are in the nba because theyre tall long and athletic with no real basketball skill i.e. stromile swift
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#8 » by kooldude » Sun May 18, 2008 8:59 pm

Profanity wrote:No, it's because almost all today's GM are homos.
They only like freaks with great bodys, great muscles, great athletism... They don't care about talent anymore.


you just described what talent is. I think you mean skillset.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
Profanity
Rookie
Posts: 1,128
And1: 15
Joined: Jun 07, 2004
Location: Barcelona

 

Post#9 » by Profanity » Sun May 18, 2008 9:05 pm

kooldude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



you just described what talent is. I think you mean skillset.


I wouldn't say Ben Wallace has any talent... but whatever.
User avatar
Kobay
General Manager
Posts: 9,404
And1: 5
Joined: May 01, 2007

 

Post#10 » by Kobay » Sun May 18, 2008 9:09 pm

Too many white guys back then.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,119
And1: 20,135
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#11 » by NO-KG-AI » Sun May 18, 2008 9:11 pm

sp6r=underrated wrote:Nostalgia
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Phobo_Phile
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,746
And1: 398
Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Location: Grand Rapids
       

 

Post#12 » by Phobo_Phile » Sun May 18, 2008 9:20 pm

I also think there are a lot of players who think they are superstars therefore they don't take the time to learn certain roles. Everybody wants to be primero uno.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#13 » by kooldude » Sun May 18, 2008 11:00 pm

Profanity wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I wouldn't say Ben Wallace has any talent... but whatever.


average above athleticism, great strength, good instincts. He lacks ideal height and an offensive skillset, he has to have some physical talent to be in the league.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
hsb
RealGM
Posts: 18,678
And1: 15,859
Joined: Nov 19, 2006
       

 

Post#14 » by hsb » Sun May 18, 2008 11:03 pm

sp6r=underrated wrote:Nostalgia


Perfect.
User avatar
0HeadAche0
Rookie
Posts: 1,018
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 30, 2006
Location: a board

 

Post#15 » by 0HeadAche0 » Sun May 18, 2008 11:10 pm

i believe that everyone should stay in college for 3 years and that would improve the standard of the NBA tenfold.
User avatar
WadeKnicks2010
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,871
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
Location: NYC

 

Post#16 » by WadeKnicks2010 » Sun May 18, 2008 11:44 pm

shawngoat23 wrote:Expansion and the increased flux of high schoolers who are drafted for potential rather than their ability to contribute immediately to a team.


yup. and the salary cap
Walmart
Starter
Posts: 2,492
And1: 1,461
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

 

Post#17 » by Walmart » Sun May 18, 2008 11:51 pm

Nostalgia as mentioned is correct. Along with the shift in focus from team to superstar.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,879
And1: 22,465
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

 

Post#18 » by Klomp » Sun May 18, 2008 11:53 pm

I think the definition of role players has changed slightly as well.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
bluefear
Pro Prospect
Posts: 847
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 21, 2007

 

Post#19 » by bluefear » Mon May 19, 2008 1:41 am

i think the salary cap these days has something to do with it as well. role players dont get paid.
User avatar
Teen Girl Squad
Head Coach
Posts: 7,044
And1: 3,191
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Location: Southern California
       

 

Post#20 » by Teen Girl Squad » Mon May 19, 2008 1:54 am

sp6r=underrated wrote:Nostalgia

Return to The General Board