RealGM

after reading a post by pen in the "build a franchise with an all-time C" thread on the PC board, this had me wondering..

should a player's attitude be made relevant in an all-time discussion?..

for example..should the immaturity of Shaq and Kobe be held against them on the all-time lists? they combined to end what was a dominant team that could have potentially won a few more championships..

should players that have asked for trades be punished on the all-time lists?..in this case, there are obvious factors like teammates and management though..but there are always different circumstances, and sometimes they're exaggerated by the players in question..

should players like Tim Duncan and Bill Russell get a better reputation and look better on the all-time list because of their unselfishness?..

No.

Nope, not at all, but we shouldn't elevate them on the pre-tense of "they could have won more if they got along." For all time lists, it is what it is.

Lawl at the sig btw.