Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Offensive peak

Giannis Antetokounmpo
38
95%
Tim Duncan
2
5%
 
Total votes: 40

falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,505
And1: 7,109
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#21 » by falcolombardi » Tue Jul 12, 2022 8:50 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:Giannis better in transition and lob threat, Duncan better at going to work in the half-court.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


This is conventional wisdom, but I’m not too sure. Giannis has been quite effective in the half court due to his ability to draw fouls. In fact, he’s been more effective as an offense creator on the ball relative to the league than in transition. 43% of his possessions came in ISO/Post up/Ball screen actions. About 28% of his possessions came in transition. As a ball handler cresting offense, he has been absolutely elite.

Play type Points per Possession (PPP)

Ball screen ball handler
2022: 70th percentile
2021: 90th percentile
2020: 94th percentile
2019: 97th percentile

ISO
2022: 67th percentile
2021: 85th percentile
2020: 58th percentile
2019: 68th percentile

Post up
2022: 70th percentile
2021: 45th percentile
2020: 52nd percentile
2019: 63rd percentile

[b]Transition[b]
2022: 53rd percentile
2021: 75th percentile
2020: 55th percentile
2019: 56th percentile

As a roll man, he’s only had 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% of his possessions being this player with good results but surprisingly not as effective real-time to the league as an in ball offense creator (85th, 60th, 66th, 94th).


One thingh i wonder

Is giannis full court efficiency lower cause his size lets him continue the fastbreak where other players couldnt?

Like imagine a guy who shoots 60% from free throws but gets them all the time in half court, his efficiency percentile as a free throw shloter would be awful, but the efficiency for half court possesions would 99 percentile good

Even if we consider 2021 a outlier and focus on his 3 year 55 percentile average in 19,20,22. A percentile 55 fastbreak is a lot more points than a percentile 55 half court possesion.....

And more importantly, if he continues the break where other pmayers wouldnt even try then he would be taking tougher fastbreak shots that may still be better than even a solid half court shot

What is giannis volume of fastbreaks here?
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,263
And1: 2,973
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#22 » by LukaTheGOAT » Wed Jul 13, 2022 4:29 am

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
DraymondGold wrote:Do people have any resilience concerns for Giannis?

in 2019 playoffs: Massive drop in scoring (-2.2 pts/75 drop, -6.8% rTS efficiency drop)
in 2020 playoffs: Drop in scoring (-2.2 pts/75 drop, -1.4% rTS efficiency drop)
in 2021 playoffs: Drop in scoring (-0.5 pts/75 drop, -3.3% rTS efficiency drop)
in 2022 playoffs: Massive drop in scoring (-1.3 pts/75 drop, -6.8% rTS efficiency drop)

Now, this is of course an oversimplification that ignores context. Giannis did have injuries at the end of a few playoff series for example. But it still concerns me that Giannis' postseason scoring consistently declines after his best regular seasons in 2019 and 2020, even if we just look at playoff games where he was healthy. This persisted in the early 2021 playoffs, and even after he supposedly "figured it out" for the last two playoff series, he went right back to dropping in 2022 (and this decline persists even if we account for the opponent's defensive rating).

I worry we're overrating Giannis' offense solely because of a memorable Finals, while forgetting... most of his other playoff performances. He's often had extreme declines against "build a wall" defenses and league-leading defenses. The best counterargument might be something akin to Bird or Curry or LeBron's resilience argument, where we say his scoring declines but he makes up for it in creation / gravity / off-ball play. But I'm not sure the eye test supports that (at least mine doesn't -- though I might have a particular bias against some of the head-scratching decisions he made earlier on... those early shot-clock 3s make me want to pull my hair out :lol: ).

And I will say team performance does correlate with this poor (offensive) resilience. Take the 2019 and 2020 regular season: the Bucks had fantastic margin of victory numbers, but they over performed against bad teams and underperformed against good teams (relative to other all-time teams).

Compare this to Duncan, who might be starting from a lower point in regular season offensive value, but he's pretty perfect at least from a resilience standpoint. Thoughts? Perhaps Duncan's resilience advantage isn't enough to make up for the fact that Giannis is just starting from a higher regular season place to begin with?



So giannis’s decline in the 2019 and 2020 playoffs was partially due to a build a wall style defense, but at the same time it’s not necessarily his fault, when youre primarily a slasher most of the time if they’re stunting on drives in a 5 out system it’s it’s not too hard to contest the drive and get back to your man when you kick it out unless you do it really early or all your teammates have an incredibly quick trigger

Post 2020 playoffs they switched their offense to a 4 out 1 in system, to create larger gaps for him to drive and kick out so stunts wouldn’t be as effective, and because of his size they could put jrue as the inside man because a guard helping on a giannis drive doesn’t do anything

2021 as a whole was pretty great I think. He had a poor first round scoring wise against Miami in the sense that he had a bad game 1 and couldn’t make anything from three, But was pretty incredibly outside of that, it’s hard to say it’s indicative when the main reason his TS fell was lower percentages from three and from the line

And I’m 2022 I feel that, that celtics team was hilariously equipped to guard him, especially with Middleton out.

I think we fall into the trap of using a teams relative def rtg to determine how difficult it was for someone to score on them, but for example it was clear that a player like Curry at least in some aspects had much less trouble than giannis because of both matchups and tactical decisions (dropping to stop the Warriors passing game and allowing him to take deep pullup threes, which obviously in hindsight was kinda dumb).

With giannis they weren’t just building a wall but they had a full rotation of utter giannis stoppers, the Celtics genuinely might have more than half of the guys in the league that are capable of guarding him.

That being said while it wasn’t his most effecient series considering the load he carried and the team almost looking like it was built specifically to stop him, I wouldn’t say it was particularly indicative of anything other than a bad matchup, which exists for almost everyone

Of the 6 series they’ve played since, the only series where there is a sense of giannis is struggling to score is the Celtics series, which I feel is pretty fair considering how well equipped they were to stop him.

I think effeciency concerns would be warranted if it was like 2019, where there’s a sense that giannis is struggling to score, which is a bit valid in the 2022 series against the Celtics, this wasn’t really what happened in 2021, which basically is if his effeciency or volume inside the arc went down because that’s the majority of his game

If it’s just him shooting poorly from the ft line or from three, that’s something you can take into account for evaluating that run soecifically but I don’t think it matters in the context of evaluating his play. I don’t have concerns for giannis in the playoffs anymore really, unless He’s facing teams that are really well built to stop him, which the Celtics are probably unique in history in that regard

In other regards, I don’t really think giannis is limited as a playmaker anymore, maybe he doesn’t find the pass as early as lebron but that’s about it, and his off ball play is pretty darn good when they go to it, but it’s obviously not gonna be as effective since turning him into a damion Jones isn’t ideal


Giannis had an effective field goal percent of 45.6% against Miami in 2021. He dropped because Bam is one of the best Giannis defenders in the league, not just because of free-throw shooting or 3-point shooting. Also the fact that Giannis would settle for so many pull-up threes in 2021 is kind of a negative to me, considering he is not good at them, and they are lost possessions.

I agree generally with your other points.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#23 » by MyUniBroDavis » Wed Jul 13, 2022 4:49 am

LukaTheGOAT wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
DraymondGold wrote:Do people have any resilience concerns for Giannis?

in 2019 playoffs: Massive drop in scoring (-2.2 pts/75 drop, -6.8% rTS efficiency drop)
in 2020 playoffs: Drop in scoring (-2.2 pts/75 drop, -1.4% rTS efficiency drop)
in 2021 playoffs: Drop in scoring (-0.5 pts/75 drop, -3.3% rTS efficiency drop)
in 2022 playoffs: Massive drop in scoring (-1.3 pts/75 drop, -6.8% rTS efficiency drop)

Now, this is of course an oversimplification that ignores context. Giannis did have injuries at the end of a few playoff series for example. But it still concerns me that Giannis' postseason scoring consistently declines after his best regular seasons in 2019 and 2020, even if we just look at playoff games where he was healthy. This persisted in the early 2021 playoffs, and even after he supposedly "figured it out" for the last two playoff series, he went right back to dropping in 2022 (and this decline persists even if we account for the opponent's defensive rating).

I worry we're overrating Giannis' offense solely because of a memorable Finals, while forgetting... most of his other playoff performances. He's often had extreme declines against "build a wall" defenses and league-leading defenses. The best counterargument might be something akin to Bird or Curry or LeBron's resilience argument, where we say his scoring declines but he makes up for it in creation / gravity / off-ball play. But I'm not sure the eye test supports that (at least mine doesn't -- though I might have a particular bias against some of the head-scratching decisions he made earlier on... those early shot-clock 3s make me want to pull my hair out :lol: ).

And I will say team performance does correlate with this poor (offensive) resilience. Take the 2019 and 2020 regular season: the Bucks had fantastic margin of victory numbers, but they over performed against bad teams and underperformed against good teams (relative to other all-time teams).

Compare this to Duncan, who might be starting from a lower point in regular season offensive value, but he's pretty perfect at least from a resilience standpoint. Thoughts? Perhaps Duncan's resilience advantage isn't enough to make up for the fact that Giannis is just starting from a higher regular season place to begin with?



So giannis’s decline in the 2019 and 2020 playoffs was partially due to a build a wall style defense, but at the same time it’s not necessarily his fault, when youre primarily a slasher most of the time if they’re stunting on drives in a 5 out system it’s it’s not too hard to contest the drive and get back to your man when you kick it out unless you do it really early or all your teammates have an incredibly quick trigger

Post 2020 playoffs they switched their offense to a 4 out 1 in system, to create larger gaps for him to drive and kick out so stunts wouldn’t be as effective, and because of his size they could put jrue as the inside man because a guard helping on a giannis drive doesn’t do anything

2021 as a whole was pretty great I think. He had a poor first round scoring wise against Miami in the sense that he had a bad game 1 and couldn’t make anything from three, But was pretty incredibly outside of that, it’s hard to say it’s indicative when the main reason his TS fell was lower percentages from three and from the line

And I’m 2022 I feel that, that celtics team was hilariously equipped to guard him, especially with Middleton out.

I think we fall into the trap of using a teams relative def rtg to determine how difficult it was for someone to score on them, but for example it was clear that a player like Curry at least in some aspects had much less trouble than giannis because of both matchups and tactical decisions (dropping to stop the Warriors passing game and allowing him to take deep pullup threes, which obviously in hindsight was kinda dumb).

With giannis they weren’t just building a wall but they had a full rotation of utter giannis stoppers, the Celtics genuinely might have more than half of the guys in the league that are capable of guarding him.

That being said while it wasn’t his most effecient series considering the load he carried and the team almost looking like it was built specifically to stop him, I wouldn’t say it was particularly indicative of anything other than a bad matchup, which exists for almost everyone

Of the 6 series they’ve played since, the only series where there is a sense of giannis is struggling to score is the Celtics series, which I feel is pretty fair considering how well equipped they were to stop him.

I think effeciency concerns would be warranted if it was like 2019, where there’s a sense that giannis is struggling to score, which is a bit valid in the 2022 series against the Celtics, this wasn’t really what happened in 2021, which basically is if his effeciency or volume inside the arc went down because that’s the majority of his game

If it’s just him shooting poorly from the ft line or from three, that’s something you can take into account for evaluating that run soecifically but I don’t think it matters in the context of evaluating his play. I don’t have concerns for giannis in the playoffs anymore really, unless He’s facing teams that are really well built to stop him, which the Celtics are probably unique in history in that regard

In other regards, I don’t really think giannis is limited as a playmaker anymore, maybe he doesn’t find the pass as early as lebron but that’s about it, and his off ball play is pretty darn good when they go to it, but it’s obviously not gonna be as effective since turning him into a damion Jones isn’t ideal


Giannis had an effective field goal percent of 45.6% against Miami in 2021. He dropped because Bam is one of the best Giannis defenders in the league, not just because of free-throw shooting or 3-point shooting. Also the fact that Giannis would settle for so many pull-up threes in 2021 is kind of a negative to me, considering he is not good at them, and they are lost possessions.

I agree generally with your other points.


His scoring inside the arc was overall in line with his usual numbers

10/24
11/16
6/10
8/14 (15 assists)

Outside of game 1 I don’t think he struggled, and it’s hard to say it’s a volume thing if they’re winning in blowouts

He’s shooting less threes in the playoffs than he did in the RS
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#24 » by MyUniBroDavis » Wed Jul 13, 2022 4:50 am

falcolombardi wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:Giannis better in transition and lob threat, Duncan better at going to work in the half-court.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


This is conventional wisdom, but I’m not too sure. Giannis has been quite effective in the half court due to his ability to draw fouls. In fact, he’s been more effective as an offense creator on the ball relative to the league than in transition. 43% of his possessions came in ISO/Post up/Ball screen actions. About 28% of his possessions came in transition. As a ball handler cresting offense, he has been absolutely elite.

Play type Points per Possession (PPP)

Ball screen ball handler
2022: 70th percentile
2021: 90th percentile
2020: 94th percentile
2019: 97th percentile

ISO
2022: 67th percentile
2021: 85th percentile
2020: 58th percentile
2019: 68th percentile

Post up
2022: 70th percentile
2021: 45th percentile
2020: 52nd percentile
2019: 63rd percentile

[b]Transition[b]
2022: 53rd percentile
2021: 75th percentile
2020: 55th percentile
2019: 56th percentile

As a roll man, he’s only had 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% of his possessions being this player with good results but surprisingly not as effective real-time to the league as an in ball offense creator (85th, 60th, 66th, 94th).


One thingh i wonder

Is giannis full court efficiency lower cause his size lets him continue the fastbreak where other players couldnt?

Like imagine a guy who shoots 60% from free throws but gets them all the time in half court, his efficiency percentile as a free throw shloter would be awful, but the efficiency for half court possesions would 99 percentile good

Even if we consider 2021 a outlier and focus on his 3 year 55 percentile average in 19,20,22. A percentile 55 fastbreak is a lot more points than a percentile 55 half court possesion.....

And more importantly, if he continues the break where other pmayers wouldnt even try then he would be taking tougher fastbreak shots that may still be better than even a solid half court shot

What is giannis volume of fastbreaks here?


It’s also in comparison to lob threats and stuff like that whose transition possessions are auto dunks. He leads the league in all four years I think in transition opportunities, he’s definately the best transition player in the nba and I think your last point is pretty much nail on the head
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,392
And1: 18,795
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#25 » by homecourtloss » Wed Jul 13, 2022 6:05 pm

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
This is conventional wisdom, but I’m not too sure. Giannis has been quite effective in the half court due to his ability to draw fouls. In fact, he’s been more effective as an offense creator on the ball relative to the league than in transition. 43% of his possessions came in ISO/Post up/Ball screen actions. About 28% of his possessions came in transition. As a ball handler cresting offense, he has been absolutely elite.

Play type Points per Possession (PPP)

Ball screen ball handler
2022: 70th percentile
2021: 90th percentile
2020: 94th percentile
2019: 97th percentile

ISO
2022: 67th percentile
2021: 85th percentile
2020: 58th percentile
2019: 68th percentile

Post up
2022: 70th percentile
2021: 45th percentile
2020: 52nd percentile
2019: 63rd percentile

[b]Transition[b]
2022: 53rd percentile
2021: 75th percentile
2020: 55th percentile
2019: 56th percentile

As a roll man, he’s only had 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% of his possessions being this player with good results but surprisingly not as effective real-time to the league as an in ball offense creator (85th, 60th, 66th, 94th).


One thingh i wonder

Is giannis full court efficiency lower cause his size lets him continue the fastbreak where other players couldnt?

Like imagine a guy who shoots 60% from free throws but gets them all the time in half court, his efficiency percentile as a free throw shloter would be awful, but the efficiency for half court possesions would 99 percentile good

Even if we consider 2021 a outlier and focus on his 3 year 55 percentile average in 19,20,22. A percentile 55 fastbreak is a lot more points than a percentile 55 half court possesion.....

And more importantly, if he continues the break where other pmayers wouldnt even try then he would be taking tougher fastbreak shots that may still be better than even a solid half court shot

What is giannis volume of fastbreaks here?


It’s also in comparison to lob threats and stuff like that whose transition possessions are auto dunks. He leads the league in all four years I think in transition opportunities, he’s definately the best transition player in the nba and I think your last point is pretty much nail on the head


Oh, I’m not disputing his overall efficacy as a lob threat and in transition, but was commenting on the original post, i.e., that Giannis was a better transition player/lob threat while Duncan “went to work in the half court.” Obviously, possessions in transition, possessions in spot up shooting, and possessions for cuts or rolling or popping are going to have higher points per possession then post ups or an iso, but the data shows that Giannis is highly effective as an on-ball creator and also talented as a post player and then also as an iso player, which suggest that perhaps he’s a better offensive player in the half court then Duncan was as well.

Off hand, one wouldn’t think Giannis would be a top 45% PPP guy in transition and a top 10% guy in creation with the ball but he is and if he’s that good relative to peers in half court, then I’m leaning towards him as a better offensive engine in the half court as well compared to Duncan overall though peak is an interesting case,
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,512
And1: 6,400
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#26 » by CharityStripe34 » Wed Jul 13, 2022 6:37 pm

I'm a huge Duncan fan. That being said, it's hard to argue against Gianni considering he's on a 5-year run of 28/12/5 with excellent efficiency and elite defense. Duncan was considerably more polished and came into the NBA as a ready-made superstar player whereas Freak evolved into the player he is. And that he only JUST started playing more like a PF in the last couple of years.

I could argue Gianni has the same type of importance that Curry does based off his gravity. When he sets screens and rolls, teams shade 2-3 defenders in converage leaving wide open shooters all game long. Generally speaking, when teams invent a defense to try and stop you or slow you down ("the wall"), you know you're incredibly dominant. He's about to enter his absolute prime years (ages 28-32 or so) so could we potentially see more marginal improvements and polishes to his game? Given his work ethic, I think we just might. I actually think this past season he was a better player than the year before when he won.

I honestly don't have an answer to this question as the Big Fundamental is awesome and in the early 00's especially. Out of respect for him I'll say "wait and see" what Gianni does in the next 1-2 seasons and if he continues to drop 30-13-6 with consecutive 31-32 PERs, paired with his usual elite-level defense and happens to win a title in the meantime....then yea his peak may just eclipse Timmy's.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,505
And1: 7,109
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#27 » by falcolombardi » Wed Jul 13, 2022 7:28 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:
One thingh i wonder

Is giannis full court efficiency lower cause his size lets him continue the fastbreak where other players couldnt?

Like imagine a guy who shoots 60% from free throws but gets them all the time in half court, his efficiency percentile as a free throw shloter would be awful, but the efficiency for half court possesions would 99 percentile good

Even if we consider 2021 a outlier and focus on his 3 year 55 percentile average in 19,20,22. A percentile 55 fastbreak is a lot more points than a percentile 55 half court possesion.....

And more importantly, if he continues the break where other pmayers wouldnt even try then he would be taking tougher fastbreak shots that may still be better than even a solid half court shot

What is giannis volume of fastbreaks here?


It’s also in comparison to lob threats and stuff like that whose transition possessions are auto dunks. He leads the league in all four years I think in transition opportunities, he’s definately the best transition player in the nba and I think your last point is pretty much nail on the head


Oh, I’m not disputing his overall efficacy as a lob threat and in transition, but was commenting on the original post, i.e., that Giannis was a better transition player/lob threat while Duncan “went to work in the half court.” Obviously, possessions in transition, possessions in spot up shooting, and possessions for cuts or rolling or popping are going to have higher points per possession then post ups or an iso, but the data shows that Giannis is highly effective as an on-ball creator and also talented as a post player and then also as an iso player, which suggest that perhaps he’s a better offensive player in the half court then Duncan was as well.

Off hand, one wouldn’t think Giannis would be a top 45% PPP guy in transition and a top 10% guy in creation with the ball but he is and if he’s that good relative to peers in half court, then I’m leaning towards him as a better offensive engine in the half court as well compared to Duncan overall though peak is an interesting case,


I think giannis is affected by one of the same thinghs lebron used to be affected (still is at times)

His half court moves look less pretty than their actual effectiveness
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,895
And1: 25,236
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#28 » by 70sFan » Wed Jul 13, 2022 7:38 pm

falcolombardi wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
It’s also in comparison to lob threats and stuff like that whose transition possessions are auto dunks. He leads the league in all four years I think in transition opportunities, he’s definately the best transition player in the nba and I think your last point is pretty much nail on the head


Oh, I’m not disputing his overall efficacy as a lob threat and in transition, but was commenting on the original post, i.e., that Giannis was a better transition player/lob threat while Duncan “went to work in the half court.” Obviously, possessions in transition, possessions in spot up shooting, and possessions for cuts or rolling or popping are going to have higher points per possession then post ups or an iso, but the data shows that Giannis is highly effective as an on-ball creator and also talented as a post player and then also as an iso player, which suggest that perhaps he’s a better offensive player in the half court then Duncan was as well.

Off hand, one wouldn’t think Giannis would be a top 45% PPP guy in transition and a top 10% guy in creation with the ball but he is and if he’s that good relative to peers in half court, then I’m leaning towards him as a better offensive engine in the half court as well compared to Duncan overall though peak is an interesting case,


I think giannis is affected by one of the same thinghs lebron used to be affected (still is at times)

His half court moves look less pretty than their actual effectiveness

I'd like to see his numbers in RS vs PS, because when I watch him working in the HC, I do have some concerns that are not related to aesthetics.
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,512
And1: 6,400
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#29 » by CharityStripe34 » Wed Jul 13, 2022 7:53 pm

This was the season where his effectiveness in the half-court improved quite a bit because of how much more refined his passing has become. He was always an unselfish player but he used to sometimes struggle with the timing of his passes and their accuracy. Because now he plays more off-ball, posting up and setting screens (though his usage is still high), it gives him more structure in terms of finding his outlets from the wings/block or the nail.

Our most recent memory of him was as a dominant "blunt instrument" against a very formidable Celtics defense that is essentially constructed to contain him, which is a big part of the reason why his FG% went from 53-54% to 46%. That and with the loss of Middleton he was forced to become more of a volume scorer. Losing Middleton meant losing their second crunch-time playmaker, best shooter and floor-spacer. Didn't help that the rest of the team forgot how to shoot threes (even open ones, 24% yikes). Considering those circumstances, I thought he had a mostly brilliant series they potentially could've won but Jayson Tatum played the greatest game of his career in that famous Game 6, going toe-to-toe with Gianni who posted a 44-20-6.

My main concerns with him in the half-court are that he's overly aggressive sometimes and goes away from those awesome baby-hooks, Richaun Holmes floaters/push-shots and his now-reliable 15-17 foot mid-rangers (43% on the season) and still wants to put dudes in the basket because he's still 27 years old and an athletic freak. Some of us Bucks fans have argued that once his athleticism starts to wane a bit to where he's about 85% of his normal self, he'll start to rely on more of those PF weapons he's been working on.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#30 » by MyUniBroDavis » Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:46 am

70sFan wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
Oh, I’m not disputing his overall efficacy as a lob threat and in transition, but was commenting on the original post, i.e., that Giannis was a better transition player/lob threat while Duncan “went to work in the half court.” Obviously, possessions in transition, possessions in spot up shooting, and possessions for cuts or rolling or popping are going to have higher points per possession then post ups or an iso, but the data shows that Giannis is highly effective as an on-ball creator and also talented as a post player and then also as an iso player, which suggest that perhaps he’s a better offensive player in the half court then Duncan was as well.

Off hand, one wouldn’t think Giannis would be a top 45% PPP guy in transition and a top 10% guy in creation with the ball but he is and if he’s that good relative to peers in half court, then I’m leaning towards him as a better offensive engine in the half court as well compared to Duncan overall though peak is an interesting case,


I think giannis is affected by one of the same thinghs lebron used to be affected (still is at times)

His half court moves look less pretty than their actual effectiveness

I'd like to see his numbers in RS vs PS, because when I watch him working in the HC, I do have some concerns that are not related to aesthetics.


I think draymondgold posted them earlier, there is a decrease, but I think it’s tough to know how much of it is variance vs situational, since most of it in 2021 can be pointed to how lower percentage in threes (lower attempts) and from the ft line vs the RS, and 2022 obviously that team seemed created to stop him lol

I would agree 2019 and 2020 there were issues even if I don’t think he’s changed as much as the teams strategy has
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,895
And1: 25,236
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#31 » by 70sFan » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:19 am

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
70sFan wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:
I think giannis is affected by one of the same thinghs lebron used to be affected (still is at times)

His half court moves look less pretty than their actual effectiveness

I'd like to see his numbers in RS vs PS, because when I watch him working in the HC, I do have some concerns that are not related to aesthetics.


I think draymondgold posted them earlier, there is a decrease, but I think it’s tough to know how much of it is variance vs situational, since most of it in 2021 can be pointed to how lower percentage in threes (lower attempts) and from the ft line vs the RS, and 2022 obviously that team seemed created to stop him lol

I would agree 2019 and 2020 there were issues even if I don’t think he’s changed as much as the teams strategy has

I think he improved as a HC scorer quite noticeably, especially from 2019. He went a long way from that, but I still think there are many things to improve in his scoring repertoire. It doesn't mean he's bad of course, we just usually compare him to the bests of the best.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#32 » by MyUniBroDavis » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:27 am

70sFan wrote:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:
70sFan wrote:I'd like to see his numbers in RS vs PS, because when I watch him working in the HC, I do have some concerns that are not related to aesthetics.


I think draymondgold posted them earlier, there is a decrease, but I think it’s tough to know how much of it is variance vs situational, since most of it in 2021 can be pointed to how lower percentage in threes (lower attempts) and from the ft line vs the RS, and 2022 obviously that team seemed created to stop him lol

I would agree 2019 and 2020 there were issues even if I don’t think he’s changed as much as the teams strategy has

I think he improved as a HC scorer quite noticeably, especially from 2019. He went a long way from that, but I still think there are many things to improve in his scoring repertoire. It doesn't mean he's bad of course, we just usually compare him to the bests of the best.


Oh I do agree in general he’s better at picking his spots and finding the open man, at the same time I think much of the effect also comes from the bucks changing their alignment to 4 out 1 in so stunting on drives is a good bit harder. This isn’t to say this is superior, but it was something that was better than them running 5 out and not doing much to stop guys from prerotating and stunting on their drives

I do think that if he gets stopped on a drive he tends to struggle, and guys that are the mobile but built and bulky and hard to push guys are kind of the issue with him, although very few guys really can fit that mold
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,512
And1: 6,400
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#33 » by CharityStripe34 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 2:40 pm

Bucks started to put the C or sometimes even the off-guard in the dunker spot a lot more starting in 2021 and more so this past season. Freak also tends to play more on the wings/block so he can find outlets or cutters a bit easier than with the five-out stuff from the top of the key.

As per the Duncan comparison, Duncan in the half-court was almost exclusively a post-up player with his very fundamental and sound game, so he came into the NBA as primarily a half-court player. But Young Duncan gets forgotten as a very good athlete with great footwork.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Offensive peak: Giannis vs Duncan 

Post#34 » by MyUniBroDavis » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:30 pm

CharityStripe34 wrote:Bucks started to put the C or sometimes even the off-guard in the dunker spot a lot more starting in 2021 and more so this past season. Freak also tends to play more on the wings/block so he can find outlets or cutters a bit easier than with the five-out stuff from the top of the key.

As per the Duncan comparison, Duncan in the half-court was almost exclusively a post-up player with his very fundamental and sound game, so he came into the NBA as primarily a half-court player. But Young Duncan gets forgotten as a very good athlete with great footwork.


The guard change is honestly super interesting since guards really can’t help on giannis drives at all, compared to most guys.

Return to Player Comparisons