trex_8063 wrote:Owly wrote:
If Bobby Jones is a 4 (I tend to mentally categorize as a 3, don't know if that's justified) I'd mention him though that might be influenced by liking his game more generally (and of course while he went hard, asthma limited his minutes).
I suppose he's ok to mention, but not remotely in the running, imo.
He's got pretty good length......but not as good as Garnett, Giannis, Duncan, or probably Kemp either.
He's got excellent end-to-end speed.......but certainly no better than [or perhaps even
as good as] KG, Giannis, or perhaps Kemp or Barkley either.
He was a good leaper, but not as much as Blake Griffin, Barkley, perhaps Kemp again (maybe others, too??).
Overall grace, body control, agility, hand/eye coordination, others.....idk, somewhere around the middle, or lower-middle, I would say.
In terms of motor/endurance, he's arguably the worst of all names mentioned thus far [due to his asthma].
In terms of strength/power, he's arguably the worst of all names mentioned thus far.
idk, this is
my impression anyway. He's a very good athlete; just not an all-time tier, imo.
EDIT: Oh, and the answer [imho] is Giannis.
Well it was as a mention, and explicitly stated as such, rather than "I think he is ....". As before I like his game so ... maybe bias.
I'll grant that I'm no good at film study and opinions are from what I read in books and some of what I read places like here.
That said
1) My understanding is "motor" is generally understood here for activity. I do get, and before coming here would have thought of, that term or at least similar terms in terms of endurance ... playing long minutes. Hence the above attempt at distinguishing them as engine and motor, don't know if that works. Wilt might be thought of as having the former but perhaps not the latter, Jones and Manu the latter not the former. And fwiw, this flaw in Jones was acknowledged above. (fwiw, the high revving motor - my impression based largely I think off posts on here, lower usage may help - wasn't acknowledged in your listing).
2) I think he'd be high on body control, agility, hand eye etc. The blocks and steals he got without perception as a gambler. I haven't done close film study but reputationally my instinct is he could cover either forward position.
3) Per above above it depends to what extent we account for era norms. I think all the players mentioned bar Hawkins and Baylor from Penbeast are, at latest, starting in the 80s and going significantly into the 90s. This could just be taken as a plus in terms of standing out within era. Arguably too though, more modern players should be better trained, better taken care of, eat better, have better equipment and be the outliers on a larger curve [(1) global population; (2) % of population aware of basketball and able to access it, (3) percentage motivated towards it as a high end, high paying option for an elite athlete] though outliers by their nature can be messy, smaller samples etc.
4) I'd be surprised if he were weaker than Hawkins, especially in terms of applied basketball strength. I may be wrong.
5) Bar a couple of categories (one already acknowledged) you typically named circa 3 guys that you felt confident putting outright ahead of him. Now this was otoh, not including maybes, and you could be hedging conservative. That said hypothetically a guy ranking fourth in all the categories, could I think come out top or else very near given the number of names
Garnett
Kemp
Rodman
Giannis
Griffin
J Smith
Zion
James
Baylor
Hawkins
Marion
K Malone
Amar'e
Barkley
McDyess
is 15, 16 just throwing in Jones (and ignoring any mentioned in my post such as Nance [mentioned later by others], Swift etc). Now there's two categories very low and the stuff above ... it's not the case here but the above isn't a watertight case that he couldn't be quite seriously in the conversation and certainly not necessarily a low end outlier. Perhaps you chucked out Pen's examples?
6) See prior post regarding differing criteria with possibility of at peak but also longer term. I would say especially Kemp, but also Barkley weren't always committed to staying in shape and lost significant athleticism. Several fast twitch leapers like McDyess, Griffin, Zion (probably), Amar'e peaked high but dropped significantly (and mostly fairly quickly) with injuries. Baylor too (though my sense he was smooth in the air with good body control rather than a huge leaper).
So whilst he's more a fringe-y mention than a serious contender for first place, people can draw tier lines where they like etc I'd say the above pushback was a touch too dismissive. And others certainly have their warts. But your mileage may vary.