How do you think the the time period of 1957 to 1969 plays out if Wilt and Russell didn't exist

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

coastalmarker99
Starter
Posts: 2,233
And1: 2,179
Joined: Nov 07, 2019
 

How do you think the the time period of 1957 to 1969 plays out if Wilt and Russell didn't exist 

Post#1 » by coastalmarker99 » Sat Sep 10, 2022 7:22 am

In this hypothetical scenario without Wilt and Russell being around from 1957 to 1969 that means that 9 MVP'S and 12 rings are up for grabs for everybody else.

Personally here's what I think happens.

Bob Pettit now enters into the Goat debate with 4 rings and 4 MVPs to go along with his 11 first-team ALL NBA selections.

Oscar with 3 MVPs and two to three rings is now viewed as a top ten player ever

West with now one MVP and 3 rings is also viewed as a top ten player ever.

Baylor with an MVP and 3 rings as well gets more love nowadays

Nate Thurmond now gets more acknowledgment nowadays with an MVP and a ring in 1967 to go along with more all NBA first team's and all-defensive first-team selections.

Bellamy dominates the the center numbers but probably still not the win column.

Lenny winning the MVP in 1968 would be viewed as the weakest MVP ever in NBA history.
Reggie Jackson is amazing and a killer in the clutch that's all.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: How do you think the the time period of 1957 to 1969 plays out if Wilt and Russell didn't exist 

Post#2 » by prolific passer » Sat Sep 10, 2022 3:50 pm

Pettit probably doesn't get Cliff Hagan and Macauley alongside him.

Return to Player Comparisons