70sFan wrote:migya wrote:70sFan wrote:No, Kareem missing 17 games is the reason why. Do you think it's unreasonable explaination?
Not as much as the Spurs winning 59 in 96 with Robinson and only 20 in 97 without him.
38-19 With Kareem isn't great, not bad, but not elite winning.
Well, technically Robinson indeed had better WOWY than Kareem in these seasons:
1974/75 Bucks with Kareem: 35-30, 44 wins pace
1974/75 Bucks without Kareem: 3-14, 15 wins pace
1995/96 Spurs with Robinson: 59-23, 59 wins pace
1996/97 Spurs without Robinson: 20-52, 20 wins pace
The difference is that 1997 Spurs tanked hard to get Duncan in the draft, while Bucks tried to make the playoffs. I wouldn't compare these two situations at all.
A better comparison would be 1992 Spurs, when Robinson missed 14 games:
1991/92 Spurs with Robinson: 42-26, 51 wins pace
1991/92 Spurs without Robinson: 5-9, 30 wins pace
Now, you can see that Kareem actually played with worse team than Admiral. Besides, comparing him to Robinson isn't anything bad - in terms of RS lifting Robinson is more impressive than Jordan himself after all. The difference is that Kareem upped his production and impact in postseason, while Robinson collapsed.