Top 50 peaks

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,879
And1: 25,202
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Top 50 peaks 

Post#21 » by 70sFan » Wed Dec 21, 2022 4:56 pm

ceoofkobefans wrote:I definitely disagree with that. I’d say Shaq is a lot better and more willing of the ball than Kareem although Kareem is usually pretty good at getting positioning he’s not really moving alot or screening or anything

I disagree. Kareem is one of the most active post players ever. He consistently moved a lot without the ball and fought for position.

I also disagree that Shaq screened a lot. Shaq worked very hard in the post without the ball, but he didn't do much else without the ball. Sometimes, he run occasional P&Rs with Kobe, but it was sporadic part of Lakers offense.

I also think Shaq is a better passer than 77 Kareem

What are the arguments for Shaq over Kareem as a passer?

and has a lot more gravity which he’s really good at utilizing.

Again, strongly disagree with "a lot". I will quote myself from a different thread:

70sFan wrote:About Shaq's gravity - this one is a massive game changer, but I wonder how much different it was compared to Kareem. I mean, this is how Kareem was guarded in 1977 playoffs:

Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image
Image

This are not highly selected screens - I picked them from one quarter of game 3 vs Warriors. Kareem absorbed ridiculous amount of defensive attention and he had a harder time beating it without the three point line.

I don't see how to quantify this, but it's not a clear edge for Shaq to me.

I don’t think 77 Kareem is significantly better than 00 Shaq on D. I think they have similar motor issues although Kareem’s aren’t as bad and he’s better at coming out of the paint than Shaq. He may also be a slightly better rim protector by 77. I think 00 Shaq is prolly like a +1.25ish defender and 77 Kareem is a +1.5ish defender

I can't see that, it's like watching two completely different tier of defenders. Kareem is vastly better rim protector, not "slightly better". Shaq was low effort, low volume rim protector with bad fundamentals. He often fouled in situations he shouldn't have. His timing is very mediocre. He often missed easy rotations.

Yeah, Kareem wasn't perfect either. His positioning wasn't always great and he could be late at times, but there is no comparison between them. Jabbar still defended a lot more shots and he could recover much better.

That's only about rim protection, Kareem crushes Shaq in every other aspect of defense (except for post defense).
NBA4Lyfe
Analyst
Posts: 3,404
And1: 1,989
Joined: Mar 23, 2022
       

Re: Top 50 peaks 

Post#22 » by NBA4Lyfe » Wed Dec 21, 2022 11:40 pm

way too low for harden

his box-score peak is up there with michael jordan
ceoofkobefans
Senior
Posts: 540
And1: 305
Joined: Jun 27, 2021
Contact:
     

Re: Top 50 peaks 

Post#23 » by ceoofkobefans » Wed Dec 21, 2022 11:57 pm

NBA4Lyfe wrote:way too low for harden

his box-score peak is up there with michael jordan


Where do you have harden? I can’t see him much higher than like 23 or 24
DNice68
Rookie
Posts: 1,143
And1: 388
Joined: Aug 22, 2012

Re: Top 50 peaks 

Post#24 » by DNice68 » Mon Dec 26, 2022 10:18 pm

70sFan wrote:Grant Hill is an interesting case. For some posters here, he's seen like a legit MVP level player, while for others just a solid all-nba level.

Personally, I don't see any reason to put him ahead of someone like Marques Johnson. I certainly fail to see his case over Barry or Baylor.

I saw Grant Hill in Detroit, and would have to agree. He just wasn’t the type of the guy to be clutch. takeover a game to win. Regular season and playoff’s he would pass the ball too much in the 4th quarter. LeBron get’s criticized for that, but he actually has many moments of closing games. Hill doesn’t have that, especially in the playoffs!
ty 4191
Veteran
Posts: 2,598
And1: 2,017
Joined: Feb 18, 2021
   

Re: Top 50 peaks 

Post#25 » by ty 4191 » Tue Dec 27, 2022 12:08 am

Entire primes would be a lot more interesting to debate than single year peaks.
ty 4191
Veteran
Posts: 2,598
And1: 2,017
Joined: Feb 18, 2021
   

Re: Top 50 peaks 

Post#26 » by ty 4191 » Tue Dec 27, 2022 12:09 am

ceoofkobefans wrote:Hello I am back and bored again so here’s another top 50 list at 6 am. This time it’s goat peaks


Where is Wilt 1967?

Read on Twitter
ceoofkobefans
Senior
Posts: 540
And1: 305
Joined: Jun 27, 2021
Contact:
     

Re: Top 50 peaks 

Post#27 » by ceoofkobefans » Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:29 pm

ty 4191 wrote:
ceoofkobefans wrote:Hello I am back and bored again so here’s another top 50 list at 6 am. This time it’s goat peaks


Where is Wilt 1967?

Read on Twitter


I used 1964 as his peak which is ranked 7th. I prefer 67 in an ATD setting but talking IRL peaks I prefer 64 slightly
ty 4191
Veteran
Posts: 2,598
And1: 2,017
Joined: Feb 18, 2021
   

Re: Top 50 peaks 

Post#28 » by ty 4191 » Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:51 pm

ceoofkobefans wrote:I used 1964 as his peak which is ranked 7th. I prefer 67 in an ATD setting but talking IRL peaks I prefer 64 slightly


viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2208310

Why do you take 64' over 67'?

Return to Player Comparisons