MyUniBroDavis wrote:Cavsfansince84 wrote:BoatsNZones wrote:Well, in an actual 1:1 comparison it's simply not fair to Ruth as it was so long ago; Ohtani is just worlds better/more advanced as a pitcher and I can't imagine the hitting numbers he'd put up in the 1920's with what he can do against modern arms (we wouldn't call the fastest most dominant sprinter of the 1920's better than the #3 sprinter of 2023, would we?). But yes, Babe 100 years ago is the obvious comparison, and he is widely recognized as a top 3 athlete in sports history. Just so long ago at this point that it's hard to make a real comparison there with the evolution of the sport.
My point is that Ohtani is not 1 of 1. He's 1 of 1 out of guys who could do both that teams actually allow to do both at the same time. Ruth may have won 300 games as a pitcher on top of being the goat batter if the Yankees had decided to let him to do both and Babe had wanted to. Then obviously there's also the Bo/Deion/Brown/Thorpe type comparisons along with some others. Ohtani is on a short list for sure though in terms of how he stands out historically.
I mean this would be like someone averaging 45 a game today and saying wilt averaged 50 though
I mean this is disgenious. We have ways to adjust Wilt's 50 point season and estimate its impact. It comes out as looking like one of the GOAT seasons, but typical 71 Kareem and 16 Steph come out ahead. Wilt didn't have the highest scoring rate per-possession even when adjusted for inflation nor the best efficiency of a high-volume season we have seen.
All people are saying is if you adjust for era, there could be someone comparable (or actually better).