Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Hardaway Sr or Haliburton

Tim Hardaway
8
42%
Tyrese Haliburton
11
58%
 
Total votes: 19

SportsGuru08
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 1,464
Joined: Dec 23, 2023
Location: Clearwater, FL
       

Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#1 » by SportsGuru08 » Mon May 27, 2024 9:29 am

Who would you prefer?
migya
General Manager
Posts: 8,064
And1: 1,480
Joined: Aug 13, 2005

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#2 » by migya » Mon May 27, 2024 10:22 am

Hardaway is forgotten but he would get by anyone with ease. He defended well and passed well. In a guard era like the current one he be even better.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,572
And1: 31,225
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#3 » by tsherkin » Mon May 27, 2024 1:07 pm

I very much misclicked, which is annoying. I'd take Haliburton right now, though I absolutely believe Hardaway would thrive in today's era. Excellent ball-handler, and small guys who like to shoot tend to fare better now as then. He'd be a riot to watch again.
SportsGuru08
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 1,464
Joined: Dec 23, 2023
Location: Clearwater, FL
       

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#4 » by SportsGuru08 » Tue Jun 4, 2024 3:50 am

tsherkin wrote:I very much misclicked, which is annoying. I'd take Haliburton right now, though I absolutely believe Hardaway would thrive in today's era. Excellent ball-handler, and small guys who like to shoot tend to fare better now as then. He'd be a riot to watch again.


Terry Porter is another point guard who'd probably fit in better today than when he played. I guess after the '92 Finals, the Blazers decided they wanted a more traditional point guard who racked up a lot of assists and brought in Strickland while relegating Porter to a sixth man type of role.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,843
And1: 5,501
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#5 » by One_and_Done » Tue Jun 4, 2024 3:55 am

Halliburton and it's not close.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,256
And1: 2,966
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#6 » by LukaTheGOAT » Tue Jun 4, 2024 5:06 am

I'll go Haliburton

I expect that Haliburton is much better than his season averages show because of his hamstring injury that he never let heal.

Tyrese Haliburton before his hamstring injury:

23.6 PPG, 12.6 APG, 63.2% TS, 40% 3FG, 14.5 drives, 4.1 FTA

Haliburton has been historically a 40% 3 pt shooter for his career, so the sudden downturn after the hamstring correlates a bit too strongly with the injury. Even if you want to suggest he couldn't keep shooting 40% on the volume he was, I just have a tough time believing he isn't a much better shooter then he showed. After injury, he was shooting 32% from 3.

At full health, there is reason to believe Haliburton isn't just several tiers up as a playmaker, but also a better scorer.

I understand it was a for a somewhat brief period, but there were a variety of offensive metrics that had Haliburton as the most valuable guy in the league on that end. Once again, I understand the argument of a hot streak, but I am not sure Hardaway has ever had a stretch in that stratosphere. Just a tremendously efficient scorer on comparable volume to Hardaway who was more of a league average efficiency guy.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,242
And1: 9,821
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#7 » by penbeast0 » Tue Jun 4, 2024 12:15 pm

In terms of Hardaway's prime level v. what Haliburton showed this past year. Hardaway was quicker, more athletic, and more aggressive defensively. Haliburton is the better shooter, playmaker, and overall more valuable player. Hardaway's being better today would depend on whether he could weaponize his 3 pointer sufficiently to compare to today's point guards who tend to shoot a lot more 3's at a higher efficiency than in Hardaway's era. Hardaway was not an efficient scorer back then, though I agree that having more space and a tendency to having only one big would help his very aggressive driving game a bit.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Im Your Father
Senior
Posts: 581
And1: 263
Joined: Jul 17, 2014

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#8 » by Im Your Father » Tue Jun 4, 2024 2:35 pm

SportsGuru08 wrote:
tsherkin wrote:I very much misclicked, which is annoying. I'd take Haliburton right now, though I absolutely believe Hardaway would thrive in today's era. Excellent ball-handler, and small guys who like to shoot tend to fare better now as then. He'd be a riot to watch again.


Terry Porter is another point guard who'd probably fit in better today than when he played. I guess after the '92 Finals, the Blazers decided they wanted a more traditional point guard who racked up a lot of assists and brought in Strickland while relegating Porter to a sixth man type of role.


I think Mark Price would be another one too.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,851
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#9 » by Colbinii » Tue Jun 4, 2024 2:47 pm

Im Your Father wrote:
SportsGuru08 wrote:
tsherkin wrote:I very much misclicked, which is annoying. I'd take Haliburton right now, though I absolutely believe Hardaway would thrive in today's era. Excellent ball-handler, and small guys who like to shoot tend to fare better now as then. He'd be a riot to watch again.


Terry Porter is another point guard who'd probably fit in better today than when he played. I guess after the '92 Finals, the Blazers decided they wanted a more traditional point guard who racked up a lot of assists and brought in Strickland while relegating Porter to a sixth man type of role.


I think Mark Price would be another one too.


How so? He would get eaten alive defensively without illegal defense.
SportsGuru08
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 1,464
Joined: Dec 23, 2023
Location: Clearwater, FL
       

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#10 » by SportsGuru08 » Wed Jun 5, 2024 4:00 pm

Colbinii wrote:
Im Your Father wrote:
SportsGuru08 wrote:
Terry Porter is another point guard who'd probably fit in better today than when he played. I guess after the '92 Finals, the Blazers decided they wanted a more traditional point guard who racked up a lot of assists and brought in Strickland while relegating Porter to a sixth man type of role.


I think Mark Price would be another one too.


How so? He would get eaten alive defensively without illegal defense.


So? Haliburton does just fine and he doesn't even try on defense.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,148
And1: 22,159
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#11 » by Doctor MJ » Wed Jun 5, 2024 6:29 pm

SportsGuru08 wrote:Who would you prefer?


Hardaway was a major hero of mine growing up, but close up analysis with the aid of stats available now that I didn't now of them makes it really hard for me to defend his stature. He was not very efficient guy in his own era who tended to go quiet in the playoffs.

Back in the day I was arguing for Hardaway over guys like KJ & Price, but at this point I'd say that KJ & Price are guys with an argument over Haliburton, with Hardaway at a lower tier than the other 3.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,572
And1: 31,225
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Tim Hardaway Senior vs Tyrese Haliburton 

Post#12 » by tsherkin » Fri Jun 7, 2024 7:54 am

Im Your Father wrote:I think Mark Price would be another one too.


I figure he'd be in the neighborhood of what he was at the time. Maybe a little bit more in the way of RS scoring. Don't know that he'd be much healthier, and he was not a large dude by any stretch of the imagination. He was a good shooter, and he was pretty quick north-south, but size is still an issue. Skillful, but not the degree of someone like, for example, Trae Young.

SportsGuru08 wrote:Terry Porter is another point guard who'd probably fit in better today than when he played. I guess after the '92 Finals, the Blazers decided they wanted a more traditional point guard who racked up a lot of assists and brought in Strickland while relegating Porter to a sixth man type of role.


Porter was good. He'd continue to be good in today's game with his size and shot, for sure. And he definitely knew how to abuse a smaller guard, like we saw versus Utah.

Return to Player Comparisons