How many championships would the 90’s Pacers have won by adding David Robinson?

[dreamshake34]

How many, if any, championships do you think the 90’s Pacers teams would have won by adding David Robinson? Assume that nothing else from history changes; the only change is swapping Rik Smits with David Robinson and it’s Robinson’s whole career across the 90’s.

1. 89-90’ Pacers (42-40) —> add 89-90’ David Robinson
2. 90-91’ Pacers (41-41) —> add 90-91’ David Robinson
3. 91-92’ Pacers (40-42) —> add 91-92’ David Robinson
4. 92-93’ Pacers (41-41) —> add 92-93’ David Robinson
5. 93-94’ Pacers (47-35) —> add 93-94’ David Robinson
6. 94-95’ Pacers (52-30) —> add 94-95’ David Robinson
7. 95-96’ Pacers (52-30) —> add 95-96’ David Robinson
8. 96-97’ Pacers (39-43) —> add 96-97’ David Robinson
9. 97-98’ Pacers (58-24) —> add 97-98’ David Robinson
10. 98-99’ Pacers (33-17)—> add 98-99’ David Robinson
11. 99-00’ Pacers (56-26) —> add 99-00’ David Robinson

Do the Pacers win the title any of these years?

[Ol Roy]

You have to think the Mark Jackson years would be potent, with Robinson applying rim pressure and Miller running around all over the floor.

[AEnigma]

Might have their own pair of threepeats 1993-95 and 1998-2000.

[migya]

When adding an alltime great to an already contending team, they'd win obviously. From 1993 onwards, not counitng Robinson missing 97, they likely win every year.

[Colbinii]

Most of them.

[Djoker]

I think they have a great chance to win in 1994, 1995 and 1998. So I'd say around 3 titles.

[Colbinii]

I think they have a great chance to win in 1994, 1995 and 1998. So I'd say around 3 titles.

1999?
2000?

[Djoker]

I think they have a great chance to win in 1994, 1995 and 1998. So I'd say around 3 titles.

1999?
2000?

There is a chance especially in 1999 but I still think the Spurs are better. Assuming of course they keep Robinson as well so there is two of them! In 2000, Robinson is already too old to make a difference IMO.

[One_and_Done]

More than Jordan.