penbeast0 wrote:2017 Isaiah Thomas was an efficient scorer relative to the league witha .625ts% and a TS Add of over 250.
Iverson wasn't but was given primacy as if he was. His career best ts% was .567 in 08 with a TS Add of just over 100. His career ts% was a rather anemic .518 (only .489 in the playoffs!) with a career negative TS Add of just worse than -425.
Maybe if he'd focused on playmaking, or efficiency, or defense, or any of the other things that he could have done very well with his great athleticism rather than on seeing how many points he could score, he would have been a better player though certainly much less celebrated.
Oh, and "not as good as Reggie Miller" is not the same as "a bum." Not as good as Jordan Poole is a bum despite the fact that Poole takes more shots than the average player and so can have some big scoring nights when he gets hot.
I have no qualm if TS and rTS is your go-to for comparing players from different eras, but it cannot be the end all be all. There's context behind the roles players had as offensive engines, their supporting cast, the geometry of the floor, the quality of defense being played and the tendencies of where/how players scored in their eras.