Over 5 fouls per 36 is pretty bonkers!

Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063
Djoker wrote:^Good post. I remember him fouling out of a few games but I didn't realize it was that bad.
Over 5 fouls per 36 is pretty bonkers!
Code: Select all
Player 1st 2nd 3rd Points Shares
1. Larry Bird 4 0 2 22 0.629
2. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 2 2 1 17 0.486
3. Julius Erving 0 3 1 10 0.286
4. Moses Malone 1 1 1 9 0.257
5. George Gervin 0 1 1 4 0.114
6. Reggie Theus 0 0 1 1 0.029
Code: Select all
Player 1st 2nd 3rd Points Shares
1. Robert Parish 2 2 0 16 0.422
2. Caldwell Jones 2 1 1 14 0.267
3. Bobby Jones 0 3 0 9 0.244
4. Dennis Johnson 1 0 3 8 0.200
5. Julius Erving 1 0 0 5 0.167
6. Elvin Hayes 0 0 1 1 0.033
6. Mychal Thompson 0 0 1 1 0.033
Code: Select all
Player 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Pts POY Shares
1. Larry Bird 6 1 2 1 1 81 0.736
2. Moses Malone 4 3 2 2 0 77 0.700
3. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1 5 4 2 0 71 0.645
4. Julius Erving 1 1 3 7 0 53 0.482
5. Marques Johnson 0 1 1 0 6 18 0.164
6. Robert Parish 0 1 0 0 0 7 0.064
7. George Gervin 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.018
7. Artis Gilmore 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.018
9. Dennis Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.009
Playing impactful defense without fouling out is a very underrated ability. It is much easier to play aggressive defense for 5 minutes and picking up 3 fouls, it's another matter to impact the defense for 40 minutes without foul trouble. It's one of the most underrated thing when you consider top defenders and that's another reason to put Russell at the GOAT position on that end.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
kcktiny wrote:Playing impactful defense without fouling out is a very underrated ability. It is much easier to play aggressive defense for 5 minutes and picking up 3 fouls, it's another matter to impact the defense for 40 minutes without foul trouble. It's one of the most underrated thing when you consider top defenders and that's another reason to put Russell at the GOAT position on that end.
Well if you want to go that route - Chamberlain was another great defensive C that committed even fewer fouls. As a matter of fact Russell, compared to Chamberlain, committed almost 50% more fouls per minute than did Wilt.
But actually during the time Chamberlain and Russell played (1956-57 to 1972-73, during which time the average C committed 5.29 PF/48min) they had the two lowest foul rates among Cs - Wilt 2.08 PF/48min, Bill 3.05 PF/48min, Nate Thurmond 3.20 PF/48min. On the other extreme during that time Ray Felix was at 8.67 PF/48min, Mel Counts 7.96 PF/48min, and Walt Dukes 7.35 PF/48min.
Fouling rates that are too low can be a result of low aggression and not disciplined defense though. Wilt has been accused of being obsessed with never fouling out that he completely stopped playing defense when he was in foul trouble.
kcktiny wrote:Fouling rates that are too low can be a result of low aggression and not disciplined defense though. Wilt has been accused of being obsessed with never fouling out that he completely stopped playing defense when he was in foul trouble.
Is that a fact.
Since the league first tracked minutes played in 1951-52, there have been 615 Cs that have played 1000+ career minutes in the NBA. Of those 615 Cs, Wilt has the best/lowest rate of fouls committed at just that aforementioned 2.08 PF/48min.
He played in 1045 regular season games and 46 min/g, so over his entire career he averaged - what - just 2 fouls per game?
So just when exactly was he in foul trouble? Like maybe the occasional holiday?
You understand that 2 quick fouls is foul trouble, right? He doesn't need 4+ fouls to be "in foul trouble."
DNice68 wrote:ShaqAttac wrote: Marques impact looks bad.
Explain?