Curry or Randolph

[breaker91]

Pick your poison. Neither player is particularly attractive, but if you somehow had one on your fav team who would you prefer. So I guess I'm asking all things considered who do you hate less.

Curry
Is lazy
Has no passion
Can't rebound
Can't score ore than 5 feet from the rim
Has no off court issues
Can't play D, pass or block a shot
Has a better contract

Randolph
A hardworker
Has a fair amount of off court baggage
Shoots a low percentage
Can't play D, pass or block a shot
Has a worse contract

[NO-KG-AI]

Randolph easily, far superior rebounder, and is effective enough as a passer to handle double teams.

[TMACFORMVP]

Yeah, at least Randolph is an above rebounder.

[MagicFan3]

Fat vs. fatter?

I'll take Randolph, because he's slightly closer to being in shape.

[miller31time]

Randolph, without a doubt. Curry can only do about one thing (strict post scoring) and is a lousy rebounder, passer, defender, ft shooter, etc.

Zach Randolph is money from the interior, can hit the mid-range jumper with relative consistency, is a pretty good free throw shooter and an average passer for his position. His defense, albeit not very good, is still better than Curry's.

[halfHAVOC]

randolph.

curry is a bum

[Hunter]

Guess I'm in the minority, but gimme Curry.

Zach may certainly be the better player, but it's friggin hard to find a C of any sort of quality. Even a one dimensional one like Curry. And it's just as hard to find a legit post-scorer.

Zach actually has a relatively low fg% for a bigman. It's true he's a vastly superior rebounder, but that's not enough for me to take him over Curry.

[Griever24]

Is it just me or am i starting to see a seperation between Knicks fans over Curry or randolph ?

I take Randolph as should you guys .. like someone mentioned hard worker and he actually provides a promlem for some teams .. Curry is inconsistent and not a good rebounder ... i have seen him air-ball a free throw this season and that said enough

[hermes]

randolph easily
rebounding is the swing vote

[kandiking]

well they're in the exact same position so i take whichever one has better stats.

[penbeast0]

Neither get a vote? Forced to choose, I'd take Randolph because lazy stars negatively influence their teammates and Curry doesn't seem to put in the effort.

[jeremy1215]

Randolph, you need defense from the center position, and Curry doesn't give you that.

[a-rod]

Randolph easily, far superior rebounder, and is effective enough as a passer to handle double teams.

agreed no need to elaborate more

[CanadianKnicksFan]

randolph

[andyhop]

give me Curry then at least only a sixth of the teams cap is sitting on the bench getting no minutes rather than a quarter with Randolph.

[Kabookalu]

Sometimes it makes you wonder why these two are on the same team at all. I'll take Randolph pretty easily.

[RJM]

Randolph.