Parker or Billups?
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Parker or Billups?
-
JustinT
- Junior
- Posts: 338
- And1: 10
- Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Parker or Billups?
who do you think is better right now.par
-
wetsthebed
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 33,421
- And1: 2,242
- Joined: Jul 11, 2005
- Location: asl?
-
-
a-rod
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,778
- And1: 21
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
- Location: Rest In Peace Dad
- Contact:
-
it depends:
Scoring: parker is better he shot 50% percent from the field, while billups shot 40% percent from the field.
Passing: billups is better because he only has 1 turnover for every 4 assist, thats the second best assist to turnover ratio.
Defense: both are good, but billups has edge do to his size and strength.
Scoring: parker is better he shot 50% percent from the field, while billups shot 40% percent from the field.
Passing: billups is better because he only has 1 turnover for every 4 assist, thats the second best assist to turnover ratio.
Defense: both are good, but billups has edge do to his size and strength.
pillwenney wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.
Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
-
WadeKnicks2010
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,871
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jan 14, 2008
- Location: NYC
-
Patterns
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,008
- And1: 18
- Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Billups' scoring is much better than Parker's. His TS% absolutely destroys Parker's and he spaces the floor for all his teammates on the floor while Parker cannot shoot the 3 and his midrange shot isn't very good.
It is true that Parker has a higher FG% but Parker doesn't shoot 3's. Chauncey is actually far more efficient than Parker.
Billups can run his team and he is a floor general. Parker isn't.
Billups is big and strong enough on the defensive end. Parker isn't.
Billups is clutch and he can take the last jumpshot because he can shoot. Parker can't. That's Manu's job.
Billups by a mile.
It is true that Parker has a higher FG% but Parker doesn't shoot 3's. Chauncey is actually far more efficient than Parker.
Billups can run his team and he is a floor general. Parker isn't.
Billups is big and strong enough on the defensive end. Parker isn't.
Billups is clutch and he can take the last jumpshot because he can shoot. Parker can't. That's Manu's job.
Billups by a mile.
-
penbeast0
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 30,342
- And1: 9,893
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
-
yeah, Billups looks like an inefficient player when you look just at his FG% but he probably is the star most highlighted by calculating TSP as his three point shooting and foul drawing take him from the lowest reaches of PGs to the highest. Add the defense and it's Billups easily; he's the player Baron Davis's fans incorrectly think Baron is.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
-
m23uza1hem36
- Starter
- Posts: 2,010
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 20, 2008
- Location: Dearborn, Michigan
It's not even close AT ALL;
Chauncey Billups, first of all hes not just better then carter but hes a top 3 point guard in these league, he's a better passer, definatley more clutch, great free throw shooter (Higher % then Steve Nash) 89.8%, he's also MUCH better defender for the person who said defense is close, it's not at all, Chauncey is the biggest most physical Point Guard in this league.
Chauncey Billups, first of all hes not just better then carter but hes a top 3 point guard in these league, he's a better passer, definatley more clutch, great free throw shooter (Higher % then Steve Nash) 89.8%, he's also MUCH better defender for the person who said defense is close, it's not at all, Chauncey is the biggest most physical Point Guard in this league.
Follow @mouzaihem
