Best player post-Jordan
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,570
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 14, 2006
doesn't Shaq being the main focus of the other team have any weight in this discussion? I'm not agreeing/disagreeing with any of you, and I don't want to get into your argument, but I always remembered Shaq being the one teams double teamed and focused on first and foremost(not to say they didn't focus on Kobe too, because they obviously did..but I always remembered Shaq coming first)..
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,982
- And1: 19,810
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
I don't see how this can't be Shaq, Kobe's prime might be longer than Shaq's, but Shaq at his peak was superior to Kobe and Duncan by a fair margin.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,892
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 03, 2008
- Contact:
NO-KG-AI wrote:I don't see how this can't be Shaq, Kobe's prime might be longer than Shaq's, but Shaq at his peak was superior to Kobe and Duncan by a fair margin.
Going by the dominating a game by themselves factor I rank them like this...
Shaq (Most dominate big man since Wilt)
Kobe (best pure talent in the league)
Duncan (good at what he does and a great team leader in a great system, far from domimating a game by himself as the other 2 IMO)
- Teddy KGB
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,306
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 03, 2006
- Location: London, United Kingdom
- Contact:
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,570
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 14, 2006
big123 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Going by the dominating a game by themselves factor I rank them like this...
Shaq (Most dominate big man since Wilt)
Kobe (best pure talent in the league)
Duncan (good at what he does and a great team leader in a great system, far from domimating a game by himself as the other 2 IMO)
*sigh* 2003..