Rodney Stuckey vs. Darko Milicic

Ray Allen Iverson · Post #1 » by **Ray Allen Iverson** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:27 am

2006, Milicic was traded for Orlando's 2007 first-round pick. Considering team needs and cap considerations: Would Memphis and Detroit swap those players for good or bad?

NetsForce · Post #2 » by **NetsForce** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:42 pm

Detroit would get better Memphis would get worse.

Cammo101 · Post #3 » by **Cammo101** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:39 pm

Memphis has no bigs aside from Darko, so they would not even consider it. Stucky has done nothing to show me I would rather have him than Darko.

Liqourish · Post #4 » by **Liqourish** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:04 pm

Stuckey>Darko.

I loved Darko when he was on the Pistons. I saw the potential he had and would flash from time to time. However, that potential will never be realized due to a poor work ethic and attitude.

Darko has the physical tools to be a great player, but he's lazy, stubborn and arrogant.

Rodney Stuckey has played a total of 48 games and is already a better investment than Darko has ever been.

a-rod · Post #5 » by **a-rod** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:13 pm

Liqourish wrote:Stuckey>Darko.

I loved Darko when he was on the Pistons. I saw the potential he had and would flash from time to time. However, that potential will never be realized due to a poor work ethic and attitude.

Darko has the physical tools to be a great player, but he's lazy, stubborn and arrogant.

Rodney Stuckey has played a total of 48 games and is already a better investment than Darko has ever been.

Plus he's that talented, i take Rodney Stuckey.....

Pats19andO · Post #6 » by **Pats19andO** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:05 am

Dorko sux. Stucky FTW

Post #7 » by **Young_Star11** » Tue Apr 1, 2008 10:21 am

Detroit don't need Darko; they have Amir Johnson.

Stuckey could be a solid combo guard in a couple of years.