PRIME KEMP VS PRIME WEBBER?

dub81 · Post #1 » by **dub81** » Sun Apr 6, 2008 6:28 pm

WHO YOU GOT?

Prime Kemp, who gave Jordan a run for there money?

or Prime Webber, who should of had a couple rings if it wasn't for the Lakers?

Post #2 » by **pillwenney** » Sun Apr 6, 2008 9:14 pm

Kemp really wasn't even the best player on those Seattle teams IMO.

I'll take Webber though. Much more skilled over all. I'd be curious to see what a prime Kemp would've done without an all-time great PG. I'm sure he still would have been good, but things wouldn't have been nearly as easy for him.

Kemp is certainly the better athlete, but it's not like a prime Webber was a slouch at all in that department. And Chris was just pretty much better in every other way.

Post #3 » by **KF10** » Sun Apr 6, 2008 9:18 pm

Yeah, like mitch said. Webber is pretty much the better player.

dub81 · Post #4 » by **dub81** » Sun Apr 6, 2008 9:38 pm

How do you think a Prime Payton would of done without Kemp?

Post #5 » by **pillwenney** » Sun Apr 6, 2008 10:49 pm

dub81 wrote:How do you think a Prime Payton would of done without Kemp?

Certainly not as much team success, but I don't think his stats would have suffered very much.

Texas Longhorns · Post #6 » by **Texas Longhorns** » Sun Apr 6, 2008 10:50 pm

I got to take Kemp.

AnSweR07 · Post #7 » by **AnSweR07** » Sun Apr 6, 2008 11:41 pm

They both fallen off dramatically near the end of their careers, but if we're going primes, Webber.

JordansBulls · Post #8 » by **JordansBulls** » Sun Apr 6, 2008 11:49 pm

Have to take Kemp, the guy simply tore Rodman up.

ubernathan · Post #9 » by **ubernathan** » Mon Apr 7, 2008 12:45 am

Kemp by far. He jump high, he dunk ball. Webber soft, call timeout when none left.

andykeikei · Post #10 » by **andykeikei** » Mon Apr 7, 2008 7:21 am

It seems that only King's fans prefer Webber more...
I think he does have better basketball skills, but Kemp with his ridiculous athleticism is more dangerous to the opposing team. Both are average on defense.
It all depends on what your team's needs, if you want a team leader and first option, I would prefer Webber since he can also create for the others with his passing skills. But if I just want a side-kick as a second option, Kemp would be more effective IMO.

Post #11 » by **VintaGe36** » Mon Apr 7, 2008 8:52 am

Prime Chris Webber was nasty.

Athleticism and a money mid range shot.

At least thats what I remember.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

CircleCitysportsfan · Post #12 » by **CircleCitysportsfan** » Mon Apr 7, 2008 9:45 am

Derrick Coleman

Teddy KGB · Post #13 » by **Teddy KGB** » Mon Apr 7, 2008 12:30 pm

EASILY Webber.

Hard2dhole · Post #14 » by **Hard2dhole** » Mon Apr 7, 2008 3:17 pm

Kemp was a freak of nature with mad hops and a god like body. He was also dumb as a bag of hammers.
Weber was an excellent passer, scorer, and rebounder. One bad call and he has been forever marked despite his record of success. gimme Weber.

Relientk101 · Post #15 » by **Relientk101** » Mon Apr 7, 2008 9:53 pm

ubernathan wrote:Kemp by far. He jump high, he dunk ball. Webber soft, call timeout when none left.

Post #16 » by **pillwenney** » Mon Apr 7, 2008 11:15 pm

VintaGe36 wrote:Prime Chris Webber was nasty.

Athleticism and a money mid range shot.

At least thats what I remember.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

You forgot "the best passer from his position ever".

GreenWithEnvy · Post #17 » by **GreenWithEnvy** » Tue Apr 8, 2008 12:41 am

Webber has total offensive arsenal, man defense, team play, passing (best passing big ever) and smarts over Kemp. Id say its CWebb by a landslide.

Pats19andO · Post #18 » by **Pats19andO** » Tue Apr 8, 2008 1:15 am

Prime Kemp>Amare

bballcool34 · Post #19 » by **bballcool34** » Tue Apr 8, 2008 3:00 am

GreenWithEnvy wrote:Webber has total offensive arsenal, man defense, team play, passing (best passing big ever) and smarts over Kemp. Id say its CWebb by a landslide.

Webber was never known for his defense, but I agree with the rest.

ilikepistonslol · Post #20 » by **ilikepistonslol** » Tue Apr 8, 2008 6:20 am

C-Webb