A Game of 2-on-2, All-Time by Team

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
wigglestrue
RealGM
Posts: 24,124
And1: 170
Joined: Feb 06, 2003
Location: Wiggling, after hitting a four-pointer of Truth

A Game of 2-on-2, All-Time by Team 

Post#1 » by wigglestrue » Sun May 4, 2008 10:03 am

Looking for the best duos, inside-outside preferably, to play a playground game. To qualify, a player needs 2-3 really good years on a team, and each player represents his 2 or 3 years-long peak. So, Magic's teammate isn't the mid 80's Kareem who played for the Lakers, it's the mid 70's Kareem who played for the Lakers. Not a question of which duo comprises the best duo per their NBA careers, but which duo would be better in a 2-on-2 game. Other legit options per team in parentheses.

Celtics: Bird-Russell (Havlicek?)
Lakers: Magic-Kareem (West, Shaq?)
Sixers: Erving-Wilt (Iverson, Barkley, Moses?)
Spurs: Gervin-Duncan (Robinson?)
Bulls: Jordan-Pippen (Gilmore?)
Jazz: Stockton-Malone (Pistol?)
Pistons: Isiah-Lanier
Rockets: TMac-Hakeem (Moses?)
Hawks: Wilkins-Pettit
Warriors: Barry-Wilt
Mavericks: Nash-Nowitzki
Suns: Nash-Barkley (Kidd?)
Wizards: Monroe-Hayes (Unseld?)
Blazers: Drexler-Walton
Kings: Archibald-Robertson
Knicks: Frazier-Ewing (King, Reed?)
Raptors: Carter-Bosh
Magic: TMac-Shaq (Howard?)
Sonics: Payton-Haywood (Kemp?)
Hornets: Paul-Mourning
Grizzlies: Miller-Gasol (JWill, Gay?)
Heat: Wade-Shaq (Hardaway, Mourning?)
Wolves: Gugliotta-Garnett
Bucks: Moncrief-Kareem (Oscar?)
Nets: Kidd-Buck (Carter, Erving?)
Clippers: Cummings-Brand
Pacers: Reggie-O'Neal
Nuggets: Thompson-Issel (English, Anthony, Lever, Camby, Mutombo?)
Cavs: LeBron-Daughtery (Nance?)
Bobcats: Wallace-Okafor
0:01.8 A. Walker makes 3-pt shot from 28 ft (assist by E. Williams) +3 109-108
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9qvmXiEuU
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

Re: A Game of 2-on-2, All-Time by Team 

Post#2 » by Point forward » Sun May 4, 2008 10:29 am

wigglestrue wrote:Looking for the best duos, inside-outside preferably, to play a playground game. To qualify, a player needs 2-3 really good years on a team, and each player represents his 2 or 3 years-long peak. So, Magic's teammate isn't the mid 80's Kareem who played for the Lakers, it's the mid 70's Kareem who played for the Lakers. Not a question of which duo comprises the best duo per their NBA careers, but which duo would be better in a 2-on-2 game. Other legit options per team in parentheses.

Celtics: Bird-Russell (Havlicek?)
Lakers: Magic-Kareem (West, Shaq?)
Sixers: Erving-Wilt (Iverson, Barkley, Moses?)
Spurs: Gervin-Duncan (Robinson?)
Bulls: Jordan-Pippen (Gilmore?)
Jazz: Stockton-Malone (Pistol?)
Pistons: Isiah-Lanier
Rockets: TMac-Hakeem (Moses?)
Hawks: Wilkins-Pettit
Warriors: Barry-Wilt
Mavericks: Nash-Nowitzki
Suns: Nash-Barkley (Kidd?)
Wizards: Monroe-Hayes (Unseld?)
Blazers: Drexler-Walton
Kings: Archibald-Robertson
Knicks: Frazier-Ewing (King, Reed?)
Raptors: Carter-Bosh
Magic: TMac-Shaq (Howard?)
Sonics: Payton-Haywood (Kemp?)
Hornets: Paul-Mourning
Grizzlies: Miller-Gasol (JWill, Gay?)
Heat: Wade-Shaq (Hardaway, Mourning?)
Wolves: Gugliotta-Garnett
Bucks: Moncrief-Kareem (Oscar?)
Nets: Kidd-Buck (Carter, Erving?)
Clippers: Cummings-Brand
Pacers: Reggie-O'Neal
Nuggets: Thompson-Issel (English, Anthony, Lever, Camby, Mutombo?)
Cavs: LeBron-Daughtery (Nance?)
Bobcats: Wallace-Okafor


Most of the proposals are very nice, like Stockton/Malone, Wilt/Barry, Paul/Zo, Moncrief/Kareem, MJ/Scottie or Wade/Shaq. Here some thoughts:

For the Pacers, I would take George McGinnis. He is better than JO.

For the Celtics, I would bite the bullet and bench Bird (yes, I know it is sacrilege), because I would take Havlicek for a 2vs2 game. Try to score on Russell/Havlicek :D

For the Mavs, Nowitzki / Finley would be better IMHO. Nash is not dynamic enough for a playground game, and his (SICK, SICK) passing is not that important in a 2vs2 game. Also, Finley actually can defend his man.

For the Kings, I would take Webber / Big O. Nate is the far better player, but he is very small. I cannot imagine Big O trying to play low post defense vs centers.

For the Rockets, I would take Hakeem of course, but IMHO Horry would be an interesting choice for his sidekick. He is far more clutch than T-Mac!

For the Grizzlies, ths just shouts for J-Will. He would be the ultimate crowd pleaser. :D
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#3 » by kooldude » Sun May 4, 2008 3:22 pm

Tmac/Hakeem ftw!
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
nyu3
Sophomore
Posts: 179
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 10, 2006

 

Post#4 » by nyu3 » Sun May 4, 2008 4:42 pm

2 on 2.... match ups become even more important.

Obviously, Celtics/Lakers/Bulls/Sixers are strongest over all. Knicks, Jazz, Blazers, and Spurs are great, too.

Hakeem's peak is as high as any ever for a big man; T-Mac (not that great in Houston) is holding Hakeem back. I think Jordan + Hakeem would probably be the best combo.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,357
And1: 9,909
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#5 » by penbeast0 » Sun May 4, 2008 5:15 pm

I wouldn't take Gervin for the Spurs. You have great bigs, need someone who can handle and play d as well as score. James Silas, Alvin Robertson, even Parker or Ginobli would be better pick. And although Duncan has the better career, Robinson is the better individual player with the higher peak.

Robinson/Parker would beat Duncan/Gervin
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
circushots
Rookie
Posts: 1,117
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 20, 2005

 

Post#6 » by circushots » Sun May 4, 2008 6:12 pm

2 on 2, you need your big to be able to switch on pick and rolls.

So Tmac and Hakeem take this, as their length and quickness allow them to matchup with pretty much any combination of guards/forwards. Hakeem's mobility allows him to guard big guys like Shaq/Wilt (as well as you can) while being able to take on 4s just as well. Tmac uses his length to do a decent job on 2s and 3s, and at least adequately bother point guards. And on offense, they are unstoppable as both guys dominate both inside and out.
User avatar
Reks
Veteran
Posts: 2,507
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 30, 2007

 

Post#7 » by Reks » Sun May 4, 2008 7:14 pm

I like Orlando's Shaq and T-Mac team. It would kick a$$
menflavor
easily the worst realgm screen name
User avatar
Optimism Prime
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 3,374
And1: 35
Joined: Jul 07, 2005
 

 

Post#8 » by Optimism Prime » Sun May 4, 2008 7:30 pm

AIizdaking wrote:I like Orlando's Shaq and T-Mac team. It would kick a$$


See above, about pick and rolls. That's all you'd need to do to beat them.
Hello ladies. Look at your posts. Now back to mine. Now back at your posts now back to MINE. Sadly, they aren't mine. But if your posts started using Optimism™, they could sound like mine. This post is now diamonds.

I'm on a horse.
User avatar
shawngoat23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 287
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

 

Post#9 » by shawngoat23 » Sun May 4, 2008 8:59 pm

West-Wilt or West-Kareem (if we take into account age, I'll take 28-yo Kareem over 32-yo Wilt)

/thread
penbeast0 wrote:Yes, he did. And as a mod, I can't even put him on ignore . . . sigh.
User avatar
zong
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,290
And1: 102
Joined: Sep 27, 2007
Location: Toronto
       

 

Post#10 » by zong » Sun May 4, 2008 9:41 pm

wow the only team I can see the Raptors beat is probably the Bobcats :(
cjx
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 6,398
Joined: Aug 03, 2005

 

Post#11 » by cjx » Sun May 4, 2008 10:38 pm

This reminds me of NBA Jam!

I wouldn't mind seeing a team of Hakeem and T-Mac with Pippen coming off the bench vs. George McGinnis and David Thompson with Ray Allen coming off the bench.

(Just imagining without sticking to the aforementioned parameters)
Equanimity, peace, harmony and conscientiousness, friends
schaffy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,893
And1: 373
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
       

 

Post#12 » by schaffy » Mon May 5, 2008 1:25 am

For the Wolves, are you counting just with the Wolves organization, or when the Lakers were in Minnesota? Because I think you could pair George Mikan with KG and have two guys 6-10. Garnett has some handles, so he could play outside and Mikan could play on the block.
Patterns
Banned User
Posts: 6,008
And1: 18
Joined: Sep 19, 2007

 

Post#13 » by Patterns » Mon May 5, 2008 1:43 am

Kobe/Shaq
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

 

Post#14 » by 5DOM » Mon May 5, 2008 1:57 am

rafer and yao
Image
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,357
And1: 9,909
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#15 » by penbeast0 » Mon May 5, 2008 2:35 am

two bigs like Garnett/Mikan wouldn't work that well. Garnett has decent handles . . . for a big . . . but would be very vulnerable to aggressive pgs like a Gary Payton or Walt Frazier and defensively hasn't got the speed to stay with them. Back in the day when they had the one-on-one contests (NBA on CBS?), the bigs didn't tend to win for just that reason.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#16 » by kooldude » Mon May 5, 2008 4:53 am

penbeast0 wrote:two bigs like Garnett/Mikan wouldn't work that well. Garnett has decent handles . . . for a big . . . but would be very vulnerable to aggressive pgs like a Gary Payton or Walt Frazier and defensively hasn't got the speed to stay with them. Back in the day when they had the one-on-one contests (NBA on CBS?), the bigs didn't tend to win for just that reason.


who were the winners in 1vs1?
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,357
And1: 9,909
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#17 » by penbeast0 » Mon May 5, 2008 1:33 pm

was looking for it but haven't found it. The ones I remember, it was usually SFs who tend to have ball skills and size, but I was like 10 years old and dont trust my memory that much.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Nuzzo
Banned User
Posts: 1,132
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 25, 2005

 

Post#18 » by Nuzzo » Mon May 5, 2008 1:41 pm

Bob Lanier won it in 1972.

Suns - Sir Charles and Connie "The Hawk" Hawkins
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,357
And1: 9,909
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#19 » by penbeast0 » Mon May 5, 2008 2:07 pm

then I'm probably wrong and a good two big set might be able to dominate (Wilt/Kareem?)

That's a nasty pair Nuzzo . . .
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

 

Post#20 » by Point forward » Mon May 5, 2008 3:00 pm

penbeast0 wrote:then I'm probably wrong and a good two big set might be able to dominate (Wilt/Kareem?)


Wilt and Kareem would never work. The two hated each other with a passion. :-?

Return to Player Comparisons