RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 (Chris Webber)

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 (Chris Webber) 

Post#1 » by trex_8063 » Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:12 pm

1. Michael Jordan
2. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
3. Lebron James
4. Bill Russell
5. Tim Duncan
6. Wilt Chamberlain
7. Magic Johnson
8. Shaquille O'Neal
9. Hakeem Olajuwon
10. Larry Bird
11. Kobe Bryant
12. Kevin Garnett
13. Oscar Robertson
14. Karl Malone
15. Jerry West
16. Julius Erving
17. Dirk Nowitzki
18. David Robinson
19. Charles Barkley
20. Moses Malone
21. John Stockton
22. Dwyane Wade
23. Chris Paul
24. Bob Pettit
25. George Mikan
26. Steve Nash
27. Patrick Ewing
28. Kevin Durant
29. Stephen Curry
30. Scottie Pippen
31. John Havlicek
32. Elgin Baylor
33. Clyde Drexler
34. Rick Barry
35. Gary Payton
36. Artis Gilmore
37. Jason Kidd
38. Walt Frazier
39. Isiah Thomas
40. Kevin McHale
41. George Gervin
42. Reggie Miller
43. Paul Pierce
44. Dwight Howard
45. Dolph Schayes
46. Bob Cousy
47. Ray Allen
48. Pau Gasol
49. Wes Unseld
50. Robert Parish
51. Russell Westbrook
52. Alonzo Mourning
53. Dikembe Mutombo
54. Manu Ginobili
55. Chauncey Billups
56. Willis Reed
57. Bob Lanier
58. Allen Iverson
59. Adrian Dantley
60. Dave Cowens
61. Elvin Hayes
62. Dominique Wilkins
63. Vince Carter
64. Alex English
65. Tracy McGrady
66. James Harden
67. Nate Thurmond
68. Sam Jones
69. Kevin Johnson
70. Bob McAdoo
71. Sidney Moncrief
72. Paul Arizin
73. Grant Hill
74. Bobby Jones
75. Chris Bosh
76. Tony Parker
77. Shawn Marion
78. Hal Greer
79. Ben Wallace
80. Dan Issel
81. Larry Nance
82. James Worthy
83. ????

Begin....

Spoiler:
Ainosterhaspie wrote:.

eminence wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Owly wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

Texas Chuck wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

fpliii wrote:.

euroleague wrote:.

pandrade83 wrote:.

Hornet Mania wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

SactoKingsFan wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

RSCS3_ wrote:.

BasketballFan7 wrote:.

micahclay wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

RCM88x wrote:.

Tesla wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

kayess wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

MisterHibachi wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

mischievous wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

Bad Gatorade wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Cyrusman122000 wrote:.

Winsome Gerbil wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

wojoaderge wrote:.

TrueLAfan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Outside wrote:.

scabbarista wrote:.

janmagn wrote:.

Arman_tanzarian wrote:.

oldschooled wrote:.

Pablo Novi wrote:.

john248 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

Senior wrote:.

twolves97 wrote:.

CodeBreaker wrote:.

JoeMalburg wrote:.

dhsilv2 wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#2 » by trex_8063 » Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:08 pm

1st vote: Carmelo Anthony
Switching gears with my picks again (I find myself doing an awful lot of jostling of the order in 80-100 range of my ATL recently). The more I ruminate on Dennis Rodman, the less comfortable I get with the higher placement I had for him up until very recently.

On Melo.....
An impact study is a little bit of a mixed bag (skewing toward negative: just so we don't embark on another semantic debate with my labeling :wink: ). His RAPM's (the impact metric I tend to put the most faith in, fwiw) look a bit questionable [that is: below expectation] in many years. otoh, WOWY studies don't look too bad at all for a player gaining traction in the early-mid 80's section of the list.

But as I've said elsewhere, I'm not comfortable putting all my eggs into one basket (and certainly not all into one that isn't a direct measure of "player goodness"). If one were to base ranking/assessment on all other factors and metrics (outside of the impact umbrella), he would conclude we're already 10+ places late on Carmelo Anthony.
With that in mind, I've a hard time putting him off any further.

Offensively he's clearly a pretty talented player. Ranged from a very good to near-elite scorer during his prime (despite spending much of that without terribly relevant play-makers around him). I've never been overly fond of his shot-selection (over-reliance on the mid-range), though that's what kept him in the "very good to near-elite" range (but never "elite", imo).

Not a particularly relevant playmaker, though no worse than James Worthy, Dominique Wilkins, or Kawhi Leonard. And has been a very good rebounding SF (occ. SF/PF) in his career, and does provide some spacing.
A mostly weak defender with sporadic seasons of "OK" defense. I'm not considering this current season, though fwiw, it indicates to me what I've suspected: that Melo could play halfway respectable defense if deployed in a more offensively limited role-player capacity (as reported he was willing to do in the Olympics, fwiw); and defense being the primary thing that has held his impact down.
Longevity is actually pretty good by this point (considerably better than Webber or Kawhi).



2nd vote: Dennis Rodman
Always an energy guy, which I admit I have a soft spot for. He came into the league as a "useful" bench player, was arguably in his prime (very near to it, anyway) by his 2nd season. Played nearly 14 seasons, and basically 11 of them are at least very near prime-level: from '88 to '98 he was on average a 14.8 PER, .154 WS/48, and +3.3 BPM player in 33.3 mpg........which we know isn't fully capturing his full defensive value some years.
He was an energetic, versatile defender and EXCELLENT rebounding combo forward right off the bat in his career, eventually becoming a DPOY (twice), before then allowing his defense to regress somewhat (still a solid post defender in Chicago) as he carved out a new niche as basically the GOAT rebounder. During the latter half of his career, I actually suspect he was more valuable on the offensive end than the defensive, as result of the fairly ridiculous ~6 OREB/game he was averaging. RAPM for '97 and '98 reflects this.

I've criticized Rodman previously for his volatile temperament and his propensity for team-cancer meltdowns (see '95 WCF), and I think it's true you need some strong (and vocal) team leaders to keep him in line. It's for this reason that I haven't supported him earlier (and in truth, I could be convinced that this is important enough a consideration that I should delay my support for him a few spots further, in favor of someone like Kawhi or Big Game James).

However, a few "intangible" things I'll credit him with to counter the negative repercussions of his erratic behavior......the positive repercussions of his erratic behavior:
1) No one could get under the skin of opposing players like Dennis Rodman. They don't call him "The Worm" for nothing. Rodman had a knack for getting in opponents' heads, sometimes taking people out of their game (see Brickowski in the '96 Finals). That's a semi-tangible value his team can continue to reap the rewards for even after Rodman takes a seat on the bench.
2) No one played the crowd like Dennis Rodman. Home-team fans LOVED him; opposing fans hated him. But he could really get the crowd going, and sometimes that fuels a team. Get the home-crowd going, the home-team can sometimes ride that momentum. And on the road, well.....Rodman didn't have a problem playing the villain (which perhaps deflects the wrath away from his teammates or the actual course of the game, and instead fixates them directly on him???).
3) The hustle plays. We you see a guy lay it all out diving in futility for a loose ball or some such, I kinda feel like [as a teammate] it makes it that much harder for you to slack off at all.......because you're just going to look bad by comparison if you do.

Anyway, Rodman's got all the other resume-filler that has been stated by another poster below, so I won't get into that. I feel bad for bumping him back once again, but I'm actually still not 100% set on him here. Could potentially be swayed to Webber, Brand, Kawhi, or Sheed (swaying me, tbh, possibly hinges more further convincing me of the extent of risk/danger/destructive potential you get with Dennis Rodman than on building the other candidates up).
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#3 » by scrabbarista » Sun Jan 21, 2018 6:33 pm

83rd: Dennis Rodman
84th: George McGinnis


Rodman won five championships and was a difference maker in all of them.
All-Defense 8 times.
MVP votes in four seasons, finishing 10th, 11th, 12th, and 15th.
Back to back Defensive Player of the Year in '90 and '91.
Unequivocably the greatest rebounder I've ever seen. Maybe there is an argument for Russell (I don't know), but I've never seen anyone do it like Rodman.
Lead the league in rebounding for 7 straight seasons.
He was All-NBA 3rd Team twice. (You can bet that if there were a 4th Team, he'd have many more appearances.)

He is absolutely not a mirage on the defensive end, absolutely not a product of different qualities being valued in a different era. He was Top 10 in Defensive Rating 9 times. Draymond Green has done it only 3 times and isn't doing it this year. Green may have peaked a little higher (last year) than Rodman defensively, but not by much if he did.

For those who didn't seem him play, Rodman was an incredibly high IQ player ("incredible" might actually be the right word, depending how much you know about him off the court), on both ends. The impeccable defensive resume - arguably among the 10 greatest ever - speaks for itself, but on offense, Rodman never got in the way. He was nearly on par with peak Joakim Noah - if you remember how well he facilitated the offense out of the high post and from the top of the key - in terms of offensive impact. Both players have two Top 10 finishes in Offensive Rating, but Rodman, of course, was an offensive contributor for many more years. He never stopped the ball, he made smart passes, he knew his role, and he had a knack for big plays. Rodman was a terror on the offensive glass - so much so, in fact, that he may have created space for his teammates rather than taken it away, because opposition bigs were so concerned with keeping him off the glass that they became hesitant (or were just too distracted) about helping on penetration. He was helped in this last part by the illegal defense rules, but there's no doubt that he would've been a smart passer, smart shooter, solid screen setter, and ungodly offensive rebounder in any era.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,223
And1: 26,100
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#4 » by Clyde Frazier » Sun Jan 21, 2018 7:08 pm

Vote 1 - Carmelo Anthony

Vote 2 - Tiny Archibald

- 14 seasons
- 6x all NBA (two 2nd, four 3rd)
- 1 top 3 and 1 top 10 MVP finish
- 1x scoring champ

Adding some new info right off the bat…

Players already voted in in Melo’s VORP and Win Shares range:

VORP

George Gervin 32.2 *-1 season
Bobby Jones 32
Dan Issel 31.2 *-3 seasons
Steve Nash 31.2
Carmelo Anthony 29.4
Kevin Johnson 28
Chris Bosh 27.5
Tony Parker 27
Bob McAdoo 26.5 *-1 season
Dave Cowens 26.2 *-3 seasons
Alonzo Mourning 24

*Number of seasons played prior to 73-74 where stat could not be calculated

Win Shares

In this case the total # of win shares speaks to Carmelo’s solid longevity. As a reference point, his prime WS/48 from 06-14 is .149 and he peaked at .184.

Hal Greer 102.7
Alex English 100.7
Grant Hilll 99.9
Allen Iverson 99
McGrady 97.3
Carmelo Anthony 97
Bobby Jones 94.1
Ben Wallace 93.5
Kevin Johnson 92.8
Sam Jones 92.3
Bob Cousy 91.1
James Harden 91.3
Sidney Moncrief 90.3
Alonzo Mourning 89.7
Bob McAdoo 89.1
Dave Cowens 86.3

In the seasons post 2014 top 100 project, the PG situation in new york did not improve at all:

14-15: Shane Larkin, Langston Galloway, 37 yr old prigioni, 33 yr old calderon

15-16: Langston Galloway, rookie Jerian Grant, 34 yr old Caldeorn — this PG rotation was so poor that carmelo ended up leading the team in APG and just about equaled calderon in AST%

16-17: Rose, Jennings, rookie Ron Baker

Jennings was really the one penetrate and dish PG the knicks had in those 3 seasons. He even seemed to buy in to the fact that he can’t shoot and really got everyone involved. Of course, he had rose starting in front of him, so his time on the floor with melo was limited. He was used more in bench lineups that actually thrived, relatively speaking.

In an era where dynamic PG play is paramount, knicks management abhorrently ignored the position. I don’t think you can find such ineptitude in a front office with playoff aspirations outside of the cousins-era kings.

- - - - -

Peak carmelo developed into one of the best offensive players in the league. The “iso melo” stigma really became an outdated narrative as you saw all he really needed was a decent PG rotation to keep the ball moving (a little different, but billups certainly got the best out of him in denver). He became one of the better off the ball players in 12-13, actually shooting more efficiently and on higher volume than durant in catch and shoot situations. His transition to a great 3 pt shooter also opened up his game, and he stepped into transition 3s about as well as anyone in the league.

He’s obviously known for his great post up and face up game, but not acknowledged as much for being a great offensive rebounder for his position. He had a deceptively quick second jump and soft touch around the rim for put backs. He also possessed a unique rolling spin move to the hoop i’m not sure anyone else in the league has. The one thing he was really average at is finishing at the rim, and i’d say that partially has to do with him not being able to take advantage of the way the game is called these days. He isn’t a freak show athlete like lebron, and he doesn’t have those long strides like durant / harden where they know the angles and draw fouls as easily as they do.

Carmelo had the full repertoire going with his career high 62 pts against charlotte last season (they ranked 5th in DRTG):



I then look at someone like dominique, who was voted in at #62, and I think a 20 spot gap between the two is pushing it. Take a look at how they compare over their first 11 seasons (dominique actually comes off as worse if you look at his whole career):

http://bkref.com/tiny/KSWoH

They’re very comparable in most areas, and carmelo actually comes out as the better postseason performer, something wilkins was well criticized for, but still managed to get voted in much earlier. I noted trex's argument in past threads about nique consistently carrying offenses with not much support. It's a valid point, although again it's 18 spots later.

There always seemed to be this all or nothing evaluation of carmelo where he’d be expected to be as good as lebron / durant (which he obviously isn’t), or he’s barely a top 20 player in the league. You may want to fault him for forcing his way to NY, but let’s not pretend like many players voted in already haven’t done the same.

ronnymac brings up a good point about low turnovers being a plus for high usage players. Below are are 20+ PPG scorers in the playoffs (excluding centers) sorted by TO% (best to worst):

http://bkref.com/tiny/HO11E

Of course there are guys at the “bottom” who were very successful, but the lower TO% can help offset some of the decrease in efficiency we see with carmelo in the playoffs.

Then we get to the clutch play. 82games.com looked at shot data from 04-09 in the reg season + 04-08 in the post season. Carmelo was 6th in the league in game winners, but #1 in the league by far in FG% on game winners at 48.1%:

http://82games.com/gamewinningshots.htm

By 2011, he already had enough game winners to choose from to create a top 10 for his career:



For clutch data from 2000-2012, carmelo was 7th in the league in FG%, and 50% of his FGs were assisted, which is interesting to note for being criticized for holding the ball too long.

http://bit.ly/1wnySdJ

[I’d obviously prefer eFG% or TS% for these figures, but they weren’t available here]

I’m aware that he hasn’t been quite as clutch over the last few seasons, but i attribute some of that to fatigue (he led the league in MPG last season) and the makeup of his teams. He’s still had his fair share of clutch moments since coming to NY, and hit multiple game winners during his first season here. He did give us this gem in 2012 as well:



Carmelo gets a decent amount of flack for his playoff resume, and I think it’s a little overstated, so I’d like to provide some context for each season. It also seems to get pushed aside that making the playoffs 10 seasons in a row is no big deal or something, especially when the majority of them came out west. Below is carmelo’s team SRS rank and the opponent’s SRS rank that he lost to in the playoffs.

CARMELO SRS RANK / OPPONENT SRS RANK

04 - 11th / 2nd
05 - 10th / 1st (eventual NBA champion spurs)
06 - 15th / 9th
07 - 9th / 1st (eventual NBA champion spurs)
08 - 11th / 2nd
09 - 8th / 3rd (eventual NBA champion lakers)
10 - 8th / 3rd
11 - 15th / 6th
12 - 11th / 4th (eventual NBA champion heat)
13 - 7th / 9th

Aside from 2013, the team he lost to has always been favored in SRS, with 4 of the 10 series losses coming to the eventual NBA champs. To me, this doesn’t reflect a player who’s come up short when he’s been expected to go farther in the playoffs. You can make the argument that if he was a better player, he may have been favored in more series, but that only goes so far.

It’s clear that he hasn’t been as fortunate as some other players as far as who he’s played with. Some more details on his recent playoff loses:

09 - This run to the WCF almost gets glossed over at times. Nuggets were 2 wins away from the finals, losing to the eventual NBA champion lakers, who were just flat out the better team.

He had some great performances during that run.

11 - Billups gets hurt in game 1 against boston (out for rest of series), then amare gets hurt in game 2 only playing 17 min. First 2 games are decided by 2 and 3 points respectively.

Tony douglas forced to play PG for the rest of the series, basically putting it out of reach.

12 - Disastrous # of injuries. Tyson chandler finishes off a DPOY season, and of course gets the flu as soon as the playoffs start. Lin doesn’t come back for the playoffs, shumpert and douglas only play 1 game a piece, baron davis eventually goes down, and the knicks are only left with 33 yr old mike bibby to run the point, who already had 1 foot in retirement.

13 - First time since carmelo came to the knicks that they really looked like a team who could make a run to the finals. PG play was always an issue prior to this season, and felton came up big in the 1st round against boston. Ball movement flowing with kidd and prigioni as well. Then in the 2nd round against indiana, chandler again doesn’t look himself, which would later be revealed that he had an “undisclosed illness” during the series. I think there’s a good chance they beat the pacers with a healthy chandler, and who knows what happens from there.

Here are the best players carmelo’s played with over the course of his career: andre miller (first few seasons of carmelo's career), kenyon martin (often injured), post 30s iverson, camby (often injured), JR smith, nene (often injured), billups, afflalo, amare (often injured), tyson chandler (often injured), kidd in his last season, in shape felton and porzingis' rookie/soph year.

Outside of iverson, that’s a collection of good players, but nothing that screams "consistent second option", or even "consistent first option" if you want to push carmelo down a notch. Porzingis and carmelo actually had great chemistry until rose came along, but their timelines unfortunately didn't match up. Fit is clearly important, too, and while iverson and carmelo never had "problems" with each other, it wasn't working. It’s not an accident that carmelo’s best seasons came with billups running the show in 2009 and a knicks team in 2013 which focused heavily on keeping the ball moving and quick decision making.

With regard to how carmelo’s career is perceived, I always go back to pierce before garnett and allen came along. Even if we agree that pierce is the better player, he had only been to the conf finals once before that trade, and i’m not sure how his career progresses without those trades being made. Does he stick with it in boston and not make anymore playoff runs? Does he eventually go to another team? I just wonder how carmelo would be looked at had he been fortunate enough to play with teammates of that caliber in his prime.
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,614
And1: 3,132
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#5 » by Owly » Sun Jan 21, 2018 7:29 pm

trex_8063 wrote:1st vote: Carmelo Anthony
Switching gears with my picks again (I find myself doing an awful lot of jostling of the order in 80-100 range of my ATL recently). The more I ruminate on Dennis Rodman, the less comfortable I get with the higher placement I had for him up until very recently.

Taking it somewhat off topic here, initially at least, does this mean there's a typed list (that tells you your probable next vote, subject to being persuaded).

If so is there a guiding methodology or more ad hoc? If a methodology ... care to share it ... and how Melo is ahead of Brand? This is part inclination towards disagreement, but mostly curiosity.

I guess I'm surprised because...
I've pointed to Brand's metrics being better (even PER where marginally behind, and PER skews pro-usage, I've noted Brand's top year is better, the minutes weighted average of Brand's top 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and eight PER seasons are each better than the same for Melo). I can't see boxscore composites not being a win for Brand. I figure boxscore composites are something you've looked at in the past and might be part of your picture.

On impact stuff which you're saying is a big part of your evaluation Melo's stuff skews negative (presuamably versus what's expected at this point). I don't know where Brand is on this stuff, but my vague recolection is the years around his peak held up okay in at least one RAPM variant I saw. Just checked in on https://sites.google.com/site/rapmstats/97-14-rapm-2 and whilst Brand doesn't look amazing, he is above Melo in version that doesn't include Melo's downswing of his career.

And then I don't see a case that Melo is better for intangiables, defense and portability. But maybe you do.

Or maybe there's something else in your methodology I'm not seeing.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,821
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#6 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jan 21, 2018 8:01 pm

Vote: Mel Daniels
Alternate: Elton Brand


There isn't much knew I can say about Mel Daniels. I know the early ABA was a pretty weak league but when you are going up against guys like Carmelo Anthony or Chris Webber, both fine scorers but neither of whom moved the needle much for their teams most of their career, a guy who was a 2 time MVP winner and the best or second best player on 3 championship teams should be looking pretty strong, even with a relatively short career. As Doctor MJ said, winners win for a reason.

Mel Daniels is certainly the only multiple MVP winner left. Nobody else changed or dominanted on both ends to the same degree for more than 1-1.5 years (Walton, Hawkins). Daniels was the best player on two championship teams plus a willing support role on a third championship though in a weak league (probably better than the pre-Russell 50s though). I tend to value defense, particularly for big men, and Mel was basically the original Alonzo Mourning with more rebounding but less shotblocking. He was a 1st round NBA pick (the first to sign with the ABA) and in the NBA would probably have been one of the best centers as well, not in the Jabbar league but then neither was anyone else, but contending with Unseld/Cowens for the rebounding leaderboard and 2nd team All-Defense and with 15-20ppg scoring on limited range (He did a lot of outside shooting his first year . . . badly; coaching of the day didn't like centers out of the post though). Like Zo, his playmaking was mediocre but in addition to strong rebounding and defense, he was Indiana's intimidator, in a league where everyone was trying to make a name for themselves. And, he did it without major foul trouble issues. The two MVPs show he was valued above his box scores.

It is reasonable to compare Daniels to Kawhi Leonard as they have similar length of career by now. Kawhi brings excellent wing defense early on, but Daniels was probably more impactful defensively as intimidating defensive centers tend to be (especially in the 20th century). Kawhi's defense is still good and his scoring has blown up, a clearly better option than Daniels; also clearly a better passer. Daniels brings rebounding and toughness at a level equal to guys like Wes Unseld or Dave Cowens who are already in from his era (other league). I think the impact Daniels brought was appreciably higher in his league than that Kawhi has in the current league, enough to overcome the much weaker league he played in. Connie Hawkins would be another early ABA guy, higher peak than Daniels, shorter career though he did have a 1st team All-NBA between his first and second major knee injury. More of a career than Walton, less than Daniels. With careers this short, the difference is magnified. Of the bunch, I rate Daniels the highest.

Bill Sharman is probably the best 50s guy left, Chet Walker or Bellamy from the 60s (Bells wasn't a great team player but it was a center's league). Paul Silas or David Thompson from the 70s? Someone like Westphal, King, or DJ form the 80s? Rodman from the 90s for pure defensive impact. In the 00s, Webber has been getting traction, but as a Washington fan, the combination of his unwillingness to hold position defensively, his poor foul draw, his tendency to go for the highlight rather than the smart play (even with passing, his greatest strength), and his poor team dynamics (unwillingness to play center on a team with 3 PFs, lazy practice habits, and being a whiny "We won, they lost" type with a history of choking make him drop well below his raw boxscore stats for me. Mark Gasol or Kawhi Leonard for active players, I might vote Kawhi here except for the fact that SA doesn't seem to falter at all when he is missing.
[/quote]
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,821
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#7 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jan 21, 2018 8:03 pm

Clyde Frazier wrote:Adding some new info right off the bat…

Players already voted in in Melo’s VORP and Win Shares range:


Instead of putting in players already voted in, could I suggest comparing Anthony to players NOT already voted in?
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#8 » by trex_8063 » Sun Jan 21, 2018 8:30 pm

Owly wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:1st vote: Carmelo Anthony
Switching gears with my picks again (I find myself doing an awful lot of jostling of the order in 80-100 range of my ATL recently). The more I ruminate on Dennis Rodman, the less comfortable I get with the higher placement I had for him up until very recently.

Taking it somewhat off topic here, initially at least, does this mean there's a typed list (that tells you your probable next vote, subject to being persuaded).

If so is there a guiding methodology or more ad hoc? If a methodology ... care to share it ... and how Melo is ahead of Brand? This is part inclination towards disagreement, but mostly curiosity.

I guess I'm surprised because...
I've pointed to Brand's metrics being better (even PER where marginally behind, and PER skews pro-usage, I've noted Brand's top year is better, the minutes weighted average of Brand's top 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and eight PER seasons are each better than the same for Melo). I can't see boxscore composites not being a win for Brand. I figure boxscore composites are something you've looked at in the past and might be part of your picture.

On impact stuff which you're saying is a big part of your evaluation Melo's stuff skews negative (presuamably versus what's expected at this point). I don't know where Brand is on this stuff, but my vague recolection is the years around his peak held up okay in at least one RAPM variant I saw. Just checked in on https://sites.google.com/site/rapmstats/97-14-rapm-2 and whilst Brand doesn't look amazing, he is above Melo in version that doesn't include Melo's downswing of his career.

And then I don't see a case that Melo is better for intangiables, defense and portability. But maybe you do.

Or maybe there's something else in your methodology I'm not seeing.



Official Criteria Thread

My criteria is the 2nd post in that thread. I tried to be as elaborate and detailed in what I value (with some indication of how heavily I value each thing). Short of explicitly stating some of the formulas I loosely use for guidance (I actually have explicitly stated some of them in other threads in the past), it's about as detailed as I can be.

I'll respond in detail wrt Melo vs Brand later on (will give you time to review my criteria post), but for now I'll just state that I think Brand here (that is: Brand over Melo) is fine. The two of them join a handful of other available candidates who would all feel appropriate to me. There's at least 6-8 players residing in the 80's on my ATL (yes, I do have a printed list with a few details on each individual) for whom I really don't have a strong preference one over the other. The differences between adjacent spots are just so negligible to me at this stage.....it's basically throwing darts, if you know what I mean.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
pandrade83
Starter
Posts: 2,040
And1: 604
Joined: Jun 07, 2017
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#9 » by pandrade83 » Sun Jan 21, 2018 9:31 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
Clyde Frazier wrote:Adding some new info right off the bat…

Players already voted in in Melo’s VORP and Win Shares range:


Instead of putting in players already voted in, could I suggest comparing Anthony to players NOT already voted in?


Top 10 WS Remaining:

Walt Bellamy - 130
Buck WIlliams - 120
Horace Grant - 118
Chet Walker - 117
Jack Sikma - 112
Terry Porter - 110
Elton Brand - 110
Detlef Schrempf - 110
Jeff Hornacek - 109
Otis Thorpe - 106

Top 10 VORP Remaining:
Webber - 46
Divac - 45
Brand - 45
Eddie Jones - 45
Horace Grant - 44
Iguodala - 44
Hornacek - 43
Kirilenko - 42
Sikma - 42
Alvan Adams - 39

My current candidate is not on these lists - full disclosure.
pandrade83
Starter
Posts: 2,040
And1: 604
Joined: Jun 07, 2017
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#10 » by pandrade83 » Sun Jan 21, 2018 9:35 pm

Primary: Tim Hardaway
Alternate: Chris Webber



I'm breaking the seal on Hardaway a little bit, so he's maybe been overlooked.

Here's my arguments for:

1.Hardaway is recognized as an elite player consistently in a competitive era

We are down to a handful of players that made All-NBA 5 X+ post-merger:

Carmelo Anthony
Tim Hardaway
Chris Webber
Yao Ming
Amare Stoudamire
Mitch Richmond

Of that group, if we filter it down further to players who made at least one first team squad, here's your list:

Tim Hardaway
Amare Stoudamire
Chris Webber

Of that group, just Hardaway & Webber finished Top 5 in MVP voting at any point in their career.

2. The Advanced Metrics/Impact Stats view him highly

-Shut up & Jam's NPI RAPM ratings (chained unweighted 5 year avg) has him as a low-level all-star from '97-'01. The two year '97 &'98 RAPM score him as about the 9th best player in a typical year with '97 scoring 2nd highest overall. While RAPM definitely gets to pick up his best year, his 2nd-4th best years are probably '91, '98, '92 (you could make an argument for flipping '91 & '98) so there's likely high impact years being omitted.

-Of the years he missed material time, his WOWY numbers are +4 in '92 & '95 each & +14 in '00.

-In '96 after trading for him, the Heat went 18-11 & were 24-29 pre-trade. The Warriors went 11-18 after the trade & were 25-28 pre-trade - indicating he upgraded the Heat & his loss caused a downgrade in the Warriors.

-Miami would have its best year by SRS when Hardaway - not Mourning - led the team in WS & '98 & '99 are virtually equal with Hardaway leading the team in WS.

3. From a Box Score standpoint, he is a very effective playmaker & scorer with strong turnover economy.

-Only four players in league history have recorded a 20 point, 9 assist >54% TS season while also achieving < 15% TOV economy:

Chris Paul, Tim Hardaway & James Harden. Hardaway is the only player to do so more than a decade ago.

-If you change the query to make it more pace based, & do 25 points + per 100 & > 40% assists, Chris Paul & Tony Parker are the only players to achieve it more than once.

Given that I'm the first to back him, I'm going to try and address some of the potential reasons why I'm the first:

1. Weak longevity - Hardaway logged 31 K Career Minutes and made All-NBA Teams 8 seasons apart.

2. Other point guards have been brought up as being better (Price in a separate thread, Archibald). - Hardaway has significantly more career WS than Price indicating better quality longevity; Archibald's career is very much a roller coaster. He put up huge stats on bad teams and so much of his career value is tied up in one year ('73) so the Archibald argument is a peak driven one.

3. Hardaway has a shaky playoff resume that saw him lose 4 times with HCA. Hardaway has a roller-coaster of a playoff resume - there's more valleys than peaks but there are a couple nice moments in key playoff victories (vs. '91 Spurs & vs. '97 Knicks).
3A. If you're going to note the rare company Hardaway is in other places, he's one of the rare players to lose in the 1st round while leading an SRS 5+ Team in WS.

'91 - Averages 25/11 plus 3 steals per game as the W's upset the Spurs in round 1 - losing to the Lakers in round 2. Good year.
'92 - Averaged 25/7/4 but shooting metrics are blah (51%) and the Warriors are upset by the Sonics. Defense was the bigger issue in the defeat (giving up 117 per 100 possessions to the Sonics). Mixed.
'96 - Heat are swept by the Bulls as Hardaway averages 18-6 on 57% TS but has 5 TO pg. Sub-par.
'97 - Hardaway gets his ass kicked by Penny in round 1 but redeems himself against the Knicks in round 2, culminating in a monster Game 7 saving the Heat. Mourning is outplayed decisively by Ewing but the Heat advance on the strength of Hardaway. Hardaway is miserable against the Bulls. Mixed.
'98 - The Heat are upset by the Knicks, but Hardaway plays well - averaging 26/7 on 59% TS. Good year.
'99 & 2000 are both bad years where the Heat lose to the Knicks w/ HCA.

4. Box Score Stats like Win Shares & VORP aren't fond of him

Tackling VORP first - We know that this is derived from BPM & BPM gives him some pretty ugly defensive scores. I think that this is a little bit of a miss for 3 reasons:

1) The RAPM data we have of his Miami years paints him as a neutral impact player on that end - he has no negative years from '97-'01 (but nothing impactful either).
2) He's an opportunistic ball thief who generates a fair amount of steals. You see him with solid defensive efforts in the video I posted above.
3) Other strong point guards of the era don't go off on him (cliff notes: He holds Isiah, Payton & Price below normal, KJ, Stockton & Magic get their typical #'s against him)

Stockton http://bkref.com/tiny/Hu3Wl
Isiah http://bkref.com/tiny/O2kos
Payton http://bkref.com/tiny/l1s9I
KJ http://bkref.com/tiny/QzMdm
Mark Price http://bkref.com/tiny/82snI
Magic http://bkref.com/tiny/Kh6fj
4) The Warrior teams he was on had garbage for rim protection

Tackling WS next: We know that WS has a big winners bias & Hardaway was stuck in a somewhat dysfunctional franchise for his first few years - that dovetails into:

5. Why did Golden State miss the playoffs twice including a 56 loss season with him as their leader?

The '95 season was a total mess for the Warriors. Don Nelson got fired midway through the year, Webber got traded for Tom Gougliotta (sp) who misses half the season, Mullin misses virtually the entire year and 14 dudes log 600+ minutes.

Your Top 8 in MInutes Played:
Spree
Hardaway
Keith Jennings
Clifford Rozier
Chris Gatling
David Wood
Tom Gugliotta (sp)
Victor Alexander

of course that team sucked - not to mention Hardaway was coming back from ACL Surgery & missed 20 games. But he still competed - averaged 20-9 while shooting 55% TS despite Spree being the only other player who can command any sort of gravity who was consistently playing.

They got ravaged with injuries the other time they missed the playoffs with him as their leader was '93.

Mullin misses 36 games
Marciuilinoius misses 52 games
Owens misses 45 games

You're not going to do great when you lose your 2nd-4th best players for 1/2 the season each. Hardaway still led a solid offense that was in the positive territory in Offensive Rating.

I'll wrap up with a great video of him in his athletic prime against the Lakers in the playoffs turning in a strong performance. Really one of my favorite players to watch growing up & I think his play earns him a spot on our list.



More to come on Webber when it's time - but my guess is he will be in a run-off soon & I can talk there.
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#11 » by scrabbarista » Sun Jan 21, 2018 11:58 pm

pandrade83 wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
Clyde Frazier wrote:Adding some new info right off the bat…

Players already voted in in Melo’s VORP and Win Shares range:


Instead of putting in players already voted in, could I suggest comparing Anthony to players NOT already voted in?


Top 10 WS Remaining:

Walt Bellamy - 130
Buck WIlliams - 120
Horace Grant - 118
Chet Walker - 117
Jack Sikma - 112
Terry Porter - 110
Elton Brand - 110
Detlef Schrempf - 110
Jeff Hornacek - 109
Otis Thorpe - 106

Top 10 VORP Remaining:
Webber - 46
Divac - 45
Brand - 45
Eddie Jones - 45
Horace Grant - 44
Iguodala - 44
Hornacek - 43
Kirilenko - 42
Sikma - 42
Alvan Adams - 39

My current candidate is not on these lists - full disclosure.


Apparently, I need to run Hornacek through my formula. And, full disclosure, I think Buck Williams is going to get my vote at some point. He's definitely the biggest surprise, to me and I expect to others, in my Top 100. But then, the primary quality valued in my current formula is longevity in the form of counting stats, and Buck certainly has that.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,821
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#12 » by penbeast0 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:40 am

I think I may change my alt to Elton Brand, he was never relevant but his counting stats are impressive and I believe he could have been a key piece on a contender pretty easily . . . and just still very uneasy about the Worm. I had thought of him as a short career guy like Daniels, whose his prime is (to me) clearly behind, but his longevity is better than I had him.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
iggymcfrack
RealGM
Posts: 11,711
And1: 9,211
Joined: Sep 26, 2017

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#13 » by iggymcfrack » Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:34 am

Brand's interesting. I feel like he has the biggest discrepancy between his stats and how valuable he actually seemed playing than anyone. I'm not gonna say which one is right, but I never would have dreamed he was a Top 100 player of all-time when he was actually in the league.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,821
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#14 » by penbeast0 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:20 pm

iggymcfrack wrote:Brand's interesting. I feel like he has the biggest discrepancy between his stats and how valuable he actually seemed playing than anyone. I'm not gonna say which one is right, but I never would have dreamed he was a Top 100 player of all-time when he was actually in the league.


I agree; same is true of Larry Nance who recently went in.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,570
And1: 26,750
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#15 » by dhsilv2 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:11 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
iggymcfrack wrote:Brand's interesting. I feel like he has the biggest discrepancy between his stats and how valuable he actually seemed playing than anyone. I'm not gonna say which one is right, but I never would have dreamed he was a Top 100 player of all-time when he was actually in the league.


I agree; same is true of Larry Nance who recently went in.


I'll 3rd this one. Owly has me wanting to go watch some Brand games as I never thought of him as a top tier guy nor was he that role player who I thought was way more valuable than people saw him as.
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,614
And1: 3,132
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#16 » by Owly » Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:59 pm

iggymcfrack wrote:Brand's interesting. I feel like he has the biggest discrepancy between his stats and how valuable he actually seemed playing than anyone. I'm not gonna say which one is right, but I never would have dreamed he was a Top 100 player of all-time when he was actually in the league.

I'd disagree, as phrased, though I think I get the gist. My problem would be the implication that his value was being measured at the time. He was on bad teams and at a position absurdly thick with top end talent (Duncan, Garnett, Nowitzki and for a while Malone - i.e. quite possibly the four best power forwards, four top 20 players, three of them around the same age/timeline as Brand) and so was ignored. Thus I can see it being surprising, but it's a tougher sell that you had a confident feel on how valuable he seemed at the time and that it was lower, so much as not considering him at all.

dhsilv2 wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
iggymcfrack wrote:Brand's interesting. I feel like he has the biggest discrepancy between his stats and how valuable he actually seemed playing than anyone. I'm not gonna say which one is right, but I never would have dreamed he was a Top 100 player of all-time when he was actually in the league.


I agree; same is true of Larry Nance who recently went in.


I'll 3rd this one. Owly has me wanting to go watch some Brand games as I never thought of him as a top tier guy nor was he that role player who I thought was way more valuable than people saw him as.

Some games in which (I assume - i.e. if he wasn't injured) Brand plays, which are out there (not saying good, bad or representative - just what there is - pre-injury).
Year refers to season, not necessarily calendar year, team order does not denote road-home status.

Pistons Bulls 2001
Clippers Suns 2002
Clippers Mavericks 2002 (incomplete)
Clippers Grizzlies 2003
Grizzlies Clipper 2007
Spurs Clippers 2007

2006 vs 7 Seconds Suns Series
ASG 2002, 2006
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#17 » by trex_8063 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:33 pm

Thru post #16:

Carmelo Anthony - 2 (Clyde Frazier, trex_8063)
Dennis Rodman - 1 (scabbarista)
Tim Hardaway - 1 (pandrade83)
Mel Daniels - 1 (penbeast0)


We'll move to runoff in a little less than 24 hours (~22, to be more precise).

Spoiler:
Ainosterhaspie wrote:.

eminence wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Owly wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

Texas Chuck wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

fpliii wrote:.

euroleague wrote:.

pandrade83 wrote:.

Hornet Mania wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

SactoKingsFan wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

RSCS3_ wrote:.

BasketballFan7 wrote:.

micahclay wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

RCM88x wrote:.

Tesla wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

kayess wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

MisterHibachi wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

mischievous wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

Bad Gatorade wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Cyrusman122000 wrote:.

Winsome Gerbil wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

wojoaderge wrote:.

TrueLAfan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Outside wrote:.

scabbarista wrote:.

janmagn wrote:.

Arman_tanzarian wrote:.

oldschooled wrote:.

Pablo Novi wrote:.

john248 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

Senior wrote:.

twolves97 wrote:.

CodeBreaker wrote:.

JoeMalburg wrote:.

dhsilv2 wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,821
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#18 » by penbeast0 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:11 pm

Of the 4, Carmelo is the scorer, appreciably higher than the others on as good or better efficiency; Rodman is the non-scorer. Both Daniels and Hardaway will get you 20ppg in their prime on above average efficiency.

Hardaway is the assist generator (obviously), with a good A/T of 8.3/2.9. Carmelo has a positive assist to turnover ratio as well. Rodman and Daniels don't with Rodman better than Daniels.

Rebounding has to go to Rodman despite Daniels having a HIGHER rebound per game average. But, when you look at rebounds available or by 100 possessions, Rodman takes a clear lead. Daniels is excellent, Rodman is arguably the GOAT. Carmelo is nothing special for a combo forward who played mainly the 3 at 6.6/game, nor was Hardaway at 3.4/game as a pure PG.

Defense is clearly Rodman with his 2 DPOY awards. Daniels was a good defender but was being beaten out in the early ABA by Julius Keye and then by Artis Gilmore. Hardaway was a decent defender too considering his size, he was a hustle guy most of his career. Carmelo has often been called lazy or uncaring about the defensive end though he seems to do better playing PF.

Intangibles favor Daniels with his two MVPs, 3 championships, and reputation as one of the most feared enforcers in a very rough early ABA. Hardaway was generally considered a positive leader when playing (he has made some offensive statements after retirement but they shouldn't count) with high energy on some decent Miami teams. Carmelo had the last nightmare year in Denver where he let it be known that he was already gone mentally plus his problems with Phil Jackson in New York. Rodman was sort of unbalanced mentally with his antics, particularly in his awful stint in San Antonio where replacing him with career mediocrity J.R. Reid actually improved the defensive rating of the team significantly despite that being Rodman's calling card. However, on the flip side, he has rings in both Detroit and Chicago so you could build a winning team with Rodman as a significant contributor.

Finally, longevity is good for all except Daniels who had an outstanding 5 year prime plus 1 high stat, low impact year as a rookie and 2 years (plus an aborted comeback of only 11 games) to finish out his career before the merger, being totally done by age 30. Daniels is also hurt by coming from a weak league (the early ABA of his best years was not up to NBA standards, particularly at guard, with guys like Rick Barry, Billy Cunninghamn, and Zelmo Beaty coming over and having career years (though Barry and Cunningham kept most of that improvement on their return to the NBA -- Beaty was physically done after his 1 big ABA season).

Just a quick overview of the players involved.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
Outside
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,052
And1: 16,679
Joined: May 01, 2017
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#19 » by Outside » Mon Jan 22, 2018 9:43 pm

I'll be out of town most of this week but will chime in as I can. Unfortunately, I'm used to having lots of tabs and windows open when I write these posts, and that doesn't work well for me on my phone, so my posts will be even worse than usual :-?

Vote: Carmelo Anthony
Alternate: Chris Webber


Short on time, but I'm going with Carmelo due to his pluses outweighing his negatives a bit better than the other candidates. He's a solid scorer, averaging at least 20 PPG every season until this one, and his efficiency is decent for a volume scorer. He was a good rebounder during his prime and has a low turnover rate for someone who handles the ball as much as he does. He was a decent defender for a couple of years but that was the exception, and he doesn't rate well generally in that area. Not a relevant playmaker. He doesn't have near enough decent playoff runs for my liking, making it out of the first round only twice, though he has good PS production. Overall, mid-80s seems like a good place for him to land.
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
pandrade83
Starter
Posts: 2,040
And1: 604
Joined: Jun 07, 2017
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 #83 

Post#20 » by pandrade83 » Tue Jan 23, 2018 12:37 am

iggymcfrack wrote:Brand's interesting. I feel like he has the biggest discrepancy between his stats and how valuable he actually seemed playing than anyone. I'm not gonna say which one is right, but I never would have dreamed he was a Top 100 player of all-time when he was actually in the league.


The two biggest biases I think it's important to be mindful of in this project are:

1) Winners Bias (sort of straight-forward; it's the reason that Bill Russell played with a bunch of HOFers)
2) What we "thought" of them when they were playing. For many players in this project, our knowledge of impact has advanced (and wrt certain players, advanced significantly) and has helped us better understand how good a player was or wasn't.

Obviously down the stretch here, you can credibly go in a lot of different directions depending on your preferences and what you weigh differently vs. a different voter - but - it is important to try and set those biases aside as hindsight/data can provide clarity that we didn't have in the moment.

Return to Player Comparisons