RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 (Rasheed Wallace)

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 (Rasheed Wallace) 

Post#1 » by trex_8063 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:19 pm

1. Michael Jordan
2. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
3. Lebron James
4. Bill Russell
5. Tim Duncan
6. Wilt Chamberlain
7. Magic Johnson
8. Shaquille O'Neal
9. Hakeem Olajuwon
10. Larry Bird
11. Kobe Bryant
12. Kevin Garnett
13. Oscar Robertson
14. Karl Malone
15. Jerry West
16. Julius Erving
17. Dirk Nowitzki
18. David Robinson
19. Charles Barkley
20. Moses Malone
21. John Stockton
22. Dwyane Wade
23. Chris Paul
24. Bob Pettit
25. George Mikan
26. Steve Nash
27. Patrick Ewing
28. Kevin Durant
29. Stephen Curry
30. Scottie Pippen
31. John Havlicek
32. Elgin Baylor
33. Clyde Drexler
34. Rick Barry
35. Gary Payton
36. Artis Gilmore
37. Jason Kidd
38. Walt Frazier
39. Isiah Thomas
40. Kevin McHale
41. George Gervin
42. Reggie Miller
43. Paul Pierce
44. Dwight Howard
45. Dolph Schayes
46. Bob Cousy
47. Ray Allen
48. Pau Gasol
49. Wes Unseld
50. Robert Parish
51. Russell Westbrook
52. Alonzo Mourning
53. Dikembe Mutombo
54. Manu Ginobili
55. Chauncey Billups
56. Willis Reed
57. Bob Lanier
58. Allen Iverson
59. Adrian Dantley
60. Dave Cowens
61. Elvin Hayes
62. Dominique Wilkins
63. Vince Carter
64. Alex English
65. Tracy McGrady
66. James Harden
67. Nate Thurmond
68. Sam Jones
69. Kevin Johnson
70. Bob McAdoo
71. Sidney Moncrief
72. Paul Arizin
73. Grant Hill
74. Bobby Jones
75. Chris Bosh
76. Tony Parker
77. Shawn Marion
78. Hal Greer
79. Ben Wallace
80. Dan Issel
81. Larry Nance
82. James Worthy
83. Chris Webber
84. ????


Go.

Spoiler:
Ainosterhaspie wrote:.

eminence wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Owly wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

Texas Chuck wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

fpliii wrote:.

euroleague wrote:.

pandrade83 wrote:.

Hornet Mania wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

SactoKingsFan wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

RSCS3_ wrote:.

BasketballFan7 wrote:.

micahclay wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

RCM88x wrote:.

Tesla wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

kayess wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

MisterHibachi wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

mischievous wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

Bad Gatorade wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Cyrusman122000 wrote:.

Winsome Gerbil wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

wojoaderge wrote:.

TrueLAfan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Outside wrote:.

scabbarista wrote:.

janmagn wrote:.

Arman_tanzarian wrote:.

oldschooled wrote:.

Pablo Novi wrote:.

john248 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

Senior wrote:.

twolves97 wrote:.

CodeBreaker wrote:.

JoeMalburg wrote:.

dhsilv2 wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,222
And1: 26,100
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#2 » by Clyde Frazier » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:03 pm

Vote 1 - Carmelo Anthony

Vote 2 - Tiny Archibald

- 14 seasons
- 6x all NBA (two 2nd, four 3rd)
- 1 top 3 and 1 top 10 MVP finish
- 1x scoring champ

Players already voted in in Melo’s VORP and Win Shares range:

VORP

George Gervin 32.2 *-1 season
Bobby Jones 32
Dan Issel 31.2 *-3 seasons
Steve Nash 31.2
Carmelo Anthony 29.4
James Worthy 28.5
Kevin Johnson 28
Chris Bosh 27.5
Tony Parker 27
Bob McAdoo 26.5 *-1 season
Dave Cowens 26.2 *-3 seasons
Alonzo Mourning 24

*Number of seasons played prior to 73-74 where stat could not be calculated

Win Shares

In this case the total # of win shares speaks to Carmelo’s solid longevity. As a reference point, his prime WS/48 from 06-14 is .149 and he peaked at .184.

Hal Greer 102.7
Alex English 100.7
Grant Hilll 99.9
Allen Iverson 99
McGrady 97.3
Carmelo Anthony 97
Bobby Jones 94.1
Ben Wallace 93.5
Kevin Johnson 92.8
Sam Jones 92.3
Bob Cousy 91.1
James Harden 91.3
Sidney Moncrief 90.3
Alonzo Mourning 89.7
Bob McAdoo 89.1
Dave Cowens 86.3
Chris Webber 84.7
James Worthy 81.2

In the seasons post 2014 top 100 project, the PG situation in new york did not improve at all:

14-15: Shane Larkin, Langston Galloway, 37 yr old prigioni, 33 yr old calderon

15-16: Langston Galloway, rookie Jerian Grant, 34 yr old Caldeorn — this PG rotation was so poor that carmelo ended up leading the team in APG and just about equaled calderon in AST%

16-17: Rose, Jennings, rookie Ron Baker

Jennings was really the one penetrate and dish PG the knicks had in those 3 seasons. He even seemed to buy in to the fact that he can’t shoot and really got everyone involved. Of course, he had rose starting in front of him, so his time on the floor with melo was limited. He was used more in bench lineups that actually thrived, relatively speaking.

In an era where dynamic PG play is paramount, knicks management abhorrently ignored the position. I don’t think you can find such ineptitude in a front office with playoff aspirations outside of the cousins-era kings.

- - - - -

Peak carmelo developed into one of the best offensive players in the league. The “iso melo” stigma really became an outdated narrative as you saw all he really needed was a decent PG rotation to keep the ball moving (a little different, but billups certainly got the best out of him in denver). He became one of the better off the ball players in 12-13, actually shooting more efficiently and on higher volume than durant in catch and shoot situations. His transition to a great 3 pt shooter also opened up his game, and he stepped into transition 3s about as well as anyone in the league.

He’s obviously known for his great post up and face up game, but not acknowledged as much for being a great offensive rebounder for his position. He had a deceptively quick second jump and soft touch around the rim for put backs. He also possessed a unique rolling spin move to the hoop i’m not sure anyone else in the league has. The one thing he was really average at is finishing at the rim, and i’d say that partially has to do with him not being able to take advantage of the way the game is called these days. He isn’t a freak show athlete like lebron, and he doesn’t have those long strides like durant / harden where they know the angles and draw fouls as easily as they do.

Carmelo had the full repertoire going with his career high 62 pts against charlotte last season (they ranked 5th in DRTG):



I then look at someone like dominique, who was voted in at #62, and I think a 20 spot gap between the two is pushing it. Take a look at how they compare over their first 11 seasons (dominique actually comes off as worse if you look at his whole career):

http://bkref.com/tiny/KSWoH

They’re very comparable in most areas, and carmelo actually comes out as the better postseason performer, something wilkins was well criticized for, but still managed to get voted in much earlier. I noted trex's argument in past threads about nique consistently carrying offenses with not much support. It's a valid point, although again it's 18 spots later.

There always seemed to be this all or nothing evaluation of carmelo where he’d be expected to be as good as lebron / durant (which he obviously isn’t), or he’s barely a top 20 player in the league. You may want to fault him for forcing his way to NY, but let’s not pretend like many players voted in already haven’t done the same.

ronnymac brings up a good point about low turnovers being a plus for high usage players. Below are are 20+ PPG scorers in the playoffs (excluding centers) sorted by TO% (best to worst):

http://bkref.com/tiny/HO11E

Of course there are guys at the “bottom” who were very successful, but the lower TO% can help offset some of the decrease in efficiency we see with carmelo in the playoffs.

Then we get to the clutch play. 82games.com looked at shot data from 04-09 in the reg season + 04-08 in the post season. Carmelo was 6th in the league in game winners, but #1 in the league by far in FG% on game winners at 48.1%:

http://82games.com/gamewinningshots.htm

By 2011, he already had enough game winners to choose from to create a top 10 for his career:



For clutch data from 2000-2012, carmelo was 7th in the league in FG%, and 50% of his FGs were assisted, which is interesting to note for being criticized for holding the ball too long.

http://bit.ly/1wnySdJ

[I’d obviously prefer eFG% or TS% for these figures, but they weren’t available here]

I’m aware that he hasn’t been quite as clutch over the last few seasons, but i attribute some of that to fatigue (he led the league in MPG last season) and the makeup of his teams. He’s still had his fair share of clutch moments since coming to NY, and hit multiple game winners during his first season here. He did give us this gem in 2012 as well:



Carmelo gets a decent amount of flack for his playoff resume, and I think it’s a little overstated, so I’d like to provide some context for each season. It also seems to get pushed aside that making the playoffs 10 seasons in a row is no big deal or something, especially when the majority of them came out west. Below is carmelo’s team SRS rank and the opponent’s SRS rank that he lost to in the playoffs.

CARMELO SRS RANK / OPPONENT SRS RANK

04 - 11th / 2nd
05 - 10th / 1st (eventual NBA champion spurs)
06 - 15th / 9th
07 - 9th / 1st (eventual NBA champion spurs)
08 - 11th / 2nd
09 - 8th / 3rd (eventual NBA champion lakers)
10 - 8th / 3rd
11 - 15th / 6th
12 - 11th / 4th (eventual NBA champion heat)
13 - 7th / 9th

Aside from 2013, the team he lost to has always been favored in SRS, with 4 of the 10 series losses coming to the eventual NBA champs. To me, this doesn’t reflect a player who’s come up short when he’s been expected to go farther in the playoffs. You can make the argument that if he was a better player, he may have been favored in more series, but that only goes so far.

It’s clear that he hasn’t been as fortunate as some other players as far as who he’s played with. Some more details on his recent playoff loses:

09 - This run to the WCF almost gets glossed over at times. Nuggets were 2 wins away from the finals, losing to the eventual NBA champion lakers, who were just flat out the better team.

He had some great performances during that run.

11 - Billups gets hurt in game 1 against boston (out for rest of series), then amare gets hurt in game 2 only playing 17 min. First 2 games are decided by 2 and 3 points respectively.

Tony douglas forced to play PG for the rest of the series, basically putting it out of reach.

12 - Disastrous # of injuries. Tyson chandler finishes off a DPOY season, and of course gets the flu as soon as the playoffs start. Lin doesn’t come back for the playoffs, shumpert and douglas only play 1 game a piece, baron davis eventually goes down, and the knicks are only left with 33 yr old mike bibby to run the point, who already had 1 foot in retirement.

13 - First time since carmelo came to the knicks that they really looked like a team who could make a run to the finals. PG play was always an issue prior to this season, and felton came up big in the 1st round against boston. Ball movement flowing with kidd and prigioni as well. Then in the 2nd round against indiana, chandler again doesn’t look himself, which would later be revealed that he had an “undisclosed illness” during the series. I think there’s a good chance they beat the pacers with a healthy chandler, and who knows what happens from there.

Here are the best players carmelo’s played with over the course of his career: andre miller (first few seasons of carmelo's career), kenyon martin (often injured), post 30s iverson, camby (often injured), JR smith, nene (often injured), billups, afflalo, amare (often injured), tyson chandler (often injured), kidd in his last season, in shape felton and porzingis' rookie/soph year.

Outside of iverson, that’s a collection of good players, but nothing that screams "consistent second option", or even "consistent first option" if you want to push carmelo down a notch. Porzingis and carmelo actually had great chemistry until rose came along, but their timelines unfortunately didn't match up. Fit is clearly important, too, and while iverson and carmelo never had "problems" with each other, it wasn't working. It’s not an accident that carmelo’s best seasons came with billups running the show in 2009 and a knicks team in 2013 which focused heavily on keeping the ball moving and quick decision making.

With regard to how carmelo’s career is perceived, I always go back to pierce before garnett and allen came along. Even if we agree that pierce is the better player, he had only been to the conf finals once before that trade, and i’m not sure how his career progresses without those trades being made. Does he stick with it in boston and not make anymore playoff runs? Does he eventually go to another team? I just wonder how carmelo would be looked at had he been fortunate enough to play with teammates of that caliber in his prime.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,820
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#3 » by penbeast0 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:15 pm

Clyde Frazier wrote:Vote 1 - Carmelo Anthony

Vote 2 - Tiny Archibald
....


Since you open your Carmelo argument with VORP and Win Shares, how does Tiny stack up in these?
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,820
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#4 » by penbeast0 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:18 pm

Vote: Mel Daniels
Alternate: Elton Brand


There isn't much new I can say about Mel Daniels. I know the early ABA was a pretty weak league but when you are going up against guys like Carmelo Anthony, a great scorer but a questionable teammate and defender, or Dennis Rodman, a GOAT level rebounder and for some years a terrific defender but pretty much a zero on the offensive end and a head case with the potential to destroy a team with his personality issues. Daniels, a 20pt/15reb prime guy who was a 2 time MVP winner and the best or second best player on 3 championship teams should be looking pretty strong, even with a relatively short career. As Doctor MJ said, winners win for a reason.

Mel Daniels is certainly the only multiple MVP winner left. Nobody else changed or dominanted on both ends to the same degree for more than 1-1.5 years (Walton, Hawkins). Daniels was the best player on two championship teams plus a willing support role on a third championship though in a weak league (probably better than the pre-Russell 50s though). I tend to value defense, particularly for big men, and Mel was basically the original Alonzo Mourning with more rebounding but less shotblocking. He was a 1st round NBA pick (the first to sign with the ABA) and in the NBA would probably have been one of the best centers as well, not in the Jabbar league but then neither was anyone else, but contending with Unseld/Cowens for the rebounding leaderboard and 2nd team All-Defense and with 15-20ppg scoring on limited range (He did a lot of outside shooting his first year . . . badly; coaching of the day didn't like centers out of the post though). Like Zo, his playmaking was mediocre but in addition to strong rebounding and defense, he was Indiana's intimidator, in a league where everyone was trying to make a name for themselves. And, he did it without major foul trouble issues. The two MVPs show he was valued above his box scores.

It is reasonable to compare Daniels to Kawhi Leonard as they have similar length of career by now. Kawhi brings excellent wing defense early on, but Daniels was probably more impactful defensively as intimidating defensive centers tend to be (especially in the 20th century). Kawhi's defense is still good and his scoring has blown up, a clearly better option than Daniels; also clearly a better passer. Daniels brings rebounding and toughness at a level equal to guys like Wes Unseld or Dave Cowens who are already in from his era (other league). I think the impact Daniels brought was appreciably higher in his league than that Kawhi has in the current league, enough to overcome the much weaker league he played in. Connie Hawkins would be another early ABA guy, higher peak than Daniels, shorter career though he did have a 1st team All-NBA between his first and second major knee injury. More of a career than Walton, less than Daniels. With careers this short, the difference is magnified. Of the bunch, I rate Daniels the highest.

Bill Sharman is probably the best 50s guy left, Chet Walker or Bellamy from the 60s (Bells wasn't a great team player but it was a center's league). Paul Silas or David Thompson from the 70s? Someone like Westphal, King, or DJ form the 80s? Rodman from the 90s for pure defensive impact. In the 00s, Elton Brand, by the numbers, looks very impressive. Amare Stoudamire has the most accolades and really impressive prime numbers . . . but didn't play any defense. Mark Gasol or Kawhi Leonard for active players, I might vote Kawhi here except for the fact that SA doesn't seem to falter at all when he is missing.

I'm pretty open to arguments for my alternative having switched twice in the last couple of threads. Hit me.
[/quote]
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,222
And1: 26,100
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#5 » by Clyde Frazier » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:36 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
Clyde Frazier wrote:Vote 1 - Carmelo Anthony

Vote 2 - Tiny Archibald
....


Since you open your Carmelo argument with VORP and Win Shares, how does Tiny stack up in these?


Tiny - 9.5 VORP (not available for first 3 seasons of his career), 83.4 win shares

Daniels - 0.6 VORP (not available for first 6 seasons of his career), 64.8 win shares

By the way, i’d probably be in on daniels much earlier if not for his relatively weak longevity. Can definitely appreciate his dominance in the ABA even if some of it came in the early years of the league.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,570
And1: 26,750
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#6 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:42 pm

Clyde Frazier wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
Clyde Frazier wrote:Vote 1 - Carmelo Anthony

Vote 2 - Tiny Archibald
....


Since you open your Carmelo argument with VORP and Win Shares, how does Tiny stack up in these?


Tiny - 9.5 VORP (not available for first 3 seasons of his career), 83.4 win shares

Daniels - 0.6 VORP (not available for first 6 seasons of his career), 64.8 win shares

By the way, i’d probably be in on daniels much earlier if not for his relatively weak longevity. Can definitely appreciate his dominance in the ABA even if some of it came in the early years of the league.


I'd project 19-20 VORP if Tiny had those years counted based on PER and WS vs VORP. Not stellar but he also has negative years taking 2.6 away. Not sure how to reconcile that and a small part of why I'm dropping Tiny for a bit longer. His peak still really jumps out of those left for me.
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,222
And1: 26,100
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#7 » by Clyde Frazier » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:55 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
Clyde Frazier wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
Since you open your Carmelo argument with VORP and Win Shares, how does Tiny stack up in these?


Tiny - 9.5 VORP (not available for first 3 seasons of his career), 83.4 win shares

Daniels - 0.6 VORP (not available for first 6 seasons of his career), 64.8 win shares

By the way, i’d probably be in on daniels much earlier if not for his relatively weak longevity. Can definitely appreciate his dominance in the ABA even if some of it came in the early years of the league.


I'd project 19-20 VORP if Tiny had those years counted based on PER and WS vs VORP. Not stellar but he also has negative years taking 2.6 away. Not sure how to reconcile that and a small part of why I'm dropping Tiny for a bit longer. His peak still really jumps out of those left for me.


As we near the end of the project, i’m trying to do my best to recognize both shorter career guys who had some really great seasons and longer career guys who consistently brought solid production. Becomes like a balancing act as fewer and fewer spots are available.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#8 » by trex_8063 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 7:27 pm

Clyde Frazier wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
Clyde Frazier wrote:
Tiny - 9.5 VORP (not available for first 3 seasons of his career), 83.4 win shares

Daniels - 0.6 VORP (not available for first 6 seasons of his career), 64.8 win shares

By the way, i’d probably be in on daniels much earlier if not for his relatively weak longevity. Can definitely appreciate his dominance in the ABA even if some of it came in the early years of the league.


I'd project 19-20 VORP if Tiny had those years counted based on PER and WS vs VORP. Not stellar but he also has negative years taking 2.6 away. Not sure how to reconcile that and a small part of why I'm dropping Tiny for a bit longer. His peak still really jumps out of those left for me.


As we near the end of the project, i’m trying to do my best to recognize both shorter career guys who had some really great seasons and longer career guys who consistently brought solid production. Becomes like a balancing act as fewer and fewer spots are available.


Yeah. As I value longevity so much, I'll be leaning toward the latter [longevity] group (I'd like to see characters like Horace Grant get voted in somewhere, for example; guys like Vlade Divac and Jeff Hornacek are intriguing to me, too). Kawhi is one short-career guy who I do think belongs on the list somewhere, though.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#9 » by trex_8063 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:14 pm

I'm feeling very shaky on my vote. I may fall back to Melo as my primary simply as a default, but otoh I may switch up.

I may drop Rodman still further; his poor defense and personal meltdown in the '95 WCF really bothers me a lot. San Antonio was more or less a legitimate contender that year: Houston was a winnable series (they lost it 4-2 even with Rodman's antics, losing game 1 by a single point [on a disastrous defensive possession by Rodman]); if they got by Houston, Orlando was certainly a winnable series in theory, too. So yeah, that series bothers me a lot. It's almost unforgivable, and has me thinking a lot wrt criticisms made by [I think] pandrade83, about him being "risky". How different would Robinson's legacy be perceived if they'd beat Houston that year? For that matter, how differently would Rodman's legacy be without the meltdown + one more finals appearance?

The more I look at him [among the "head-cases" left], I'm strongly considering casting one of my votes for Rasheed Wallace.

Owly's also got me thinking hard on Elton Brand.

I'm also thinking on Terry Porter as the top guard on my radar. And also [among the group of "longer careers guys who brought consistent production", as Clyde put it], I'm wondering if we're near a point where we can consider Horace Grant.


Hmm.......so many considerations. Will have to "throw my darts" soon.....
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,570
And1: 26,750
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#10 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:41 pm

trex_8063 wrote:I'm feeling very shaky on my vote. I may fall back to Melo as my primary simply as a default, but otoh I may switch up.

I may drop Rodman still further; his poor defense and personal meltdown in the '95 WCF really bothers me a lot. San Antonio was more or less a legitimate contender that year: Houston was a winnable series (they lost it 4-2 even with Rodman's antics, losing game 1 by a single point [on a disastrous defensive possession by Rodman]); if they got by Houston, Orlando was certainly a winnable series in theory, too. So yeah, that series bothers me a lot. It's almost unforgivable, and has me thinking a lot wrt criticisms made by [I think] pandrade83, about him being "risky". How different would Robinson's legacy be perceived if they'd beat Houston that year? For that matter, how differently would Rodman's legacy be without the meltdown + one more finals appearance?

The more I look at him [among the "head-cases" left], I'm strongly considering casting one of my votes for Rasheed Wallace.

Owly's also got me thinking hard on Elton Brand.

I'm also thinking on Terry Porter as the top guard on my radar. And also [among the group of "longer careers guys who brought consistent production", as Clyde put it], I'm wondering if we're near a point where we can consider Horace Grant.


Hmm.......so many considerations. Will have to "throw my darts" soon.....


Can you make a case for Grant over Sheed without a heavy dose of "god bless and good night" type issues?

Both 1100+ games
Both 100+ WS but less than 120
Similar VORP

I'm losing this argument as grant is ahead in all 3 of the above. Not enough to draw a clear distinction but it's pretty telling.

Grant then extends those stats in the playoffs.

Wow....knew grant would come up strong here, but I'm thinking I might jump Grant to the top and have Grant followed by Sheed. My only concern is having watched them both play, Rasheed could do more and I feel that should count. OK maybe you don't hvae to sell me on Grant too hard.
pandrade83
Starter
Posts: 2,040
And1: 604
Joined: Jun 07, 2017
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#11 » by pandrade83 » Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:10 am

Primary: Tim Hardaway
Alternate: Dennis Rodman


Not sure how many people saw/didn't see my post on Hardaway vs. Tiny. Since Tiny is getting some traction, I figured I'd lead with this rather than make the same post on Hardaway for the 3rd straight time.

Here's some of the reasons I take Hardaway over Tiny:

A little bit better Box Metrics in a materially better era

Hardaway generates 85 Career WS to Tiny's 83.4 and about 2/3 of Tiny's WS comes pre-merger; I think that's note-worthy. Tiny posts a positive Box Score +/- just once post merger as well; showing a clear drop-off (though partially due to age). Hardaway also has marginally better PER (18.6 vs. 18.0). I'm willing to concede that Tiny's best BPM Years probably aren't captured ('72 & '73) but it's likely that Hardaway has a superior Career VORP Score as well since '74-'84 leave him with 9.5 vs. Hardaway's 34.6.

Solid defender vs. Weak Defender

I think the game clips + the RAPM Data + the steal frequency + some of the h2h matchups I've previously posted shows a fair picture of a capable defender. I wouldn't call Hardaway elite or anything - but he's solid. Archibald on the other hand was pretty bad on metrics & I'll add to it with some of the data from Owly:

After rookie season
The Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball 1971-72 – A Jim O’Brien Book [different to later Hollander edited books]
Has trouble on defense … Has tremendous body control, however, and could come a long way in that area this season.

After ’74 (4th year) but mainly in reference to earlier seasons as playing only
1975 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald will have to make an effort on defense or will have his problems with [incoming head coach Phil] Johnson. In the past he gave back many of the points he scored.
[player section:]

1977 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald can be pesky in a pressing situation, perhaps, but overall he’s a liability.
[player section:]

1978 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald can be a pest, but he can’t contain anyone over 40 minutes.
[player section:]

DNP in the prior, 77-78, season.
1979 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] In Archibald, Knight and Barnes, they have acquired offensive talents who can make it an exciting team, but a porous one as well.
[player section:]

1980 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald has lost a step and can’t guard his house.
[player section:]

1981 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald is adequate against players his size (both of them).
[player section:]

No mentions of his D in either section of the ’82 Handbook

1983 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald can be beaten because of his size …
[player section:]

Playoffs

I was pretty candid about Hardaway's playoff performance - warts & all. But Tiny's indisputably and materially worse. He has a negative BPM every year, never even gets to 14 on PER, and the one time he made it in his prime, he went for 20-5 on 44% TS.

The case for Archibald is

Thinking about this from a pro-Tiny perspective, I think the biggest case is being really in love with that '73 season and valuing the peak he brings over the career value edge that Hardaway seems to have. He's part of a 3 man 30 pt 10 assist club with the Big O & Westbrook. He did so while shooting 56% TS which is pretty strong for the era and anchors the #1 offense while doing so without having a 3 point line and with Sam Lacey being the next best player on the team.

It's a great season. I get the appeal of that season - but if you're backing Tiny over Hardaway, you need to remember that Tiny didn't get in the playoffs that year. But that would be the only time before playing with Larry Bird where he was on a positive offense and for a point guard who was clearly a defensive liability, that seems problematic.

If I'm picking a guy for pure peak, I'd rather go with Kawhi or Walton.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We're all pretty familiar with the pros/cons of Rodman. It's been fleshed out really well. His head-case problems really bother people and I think that's reasonable. As such, my case for him isn't going to lean on quantitative metrics (much) - rather one of his problems.

He was a head case to deal with - I'm not 100% sure I'd want him on my team unless I'm a contender with strong AND vocal leadership. I get that. He's near the very top of the "fortunate to be in his situation" lottery - because if he had played anywhere but for the squads he did, he's not relevant.

But he did - and this isn't a situation where he'd be ignored if he had the same level of performance if he played on a non-contender.

Rodman's impact is of an elite caliber.

'90 - With Rodman coming off the bench: 26-14 - with him starting: 33-9. Detroit was more cohesive. +11 in wins (admittedly this has a lot of noise just talking about coming off bench vs. starting):
'93 - 36-26 with, 4-16 without. +32 in wins.
'94 - Upon joining the Spurs they go from +2.2 SRS to +5.
'95 - 40-9 with, 22-11 without. +12 in wins.
'96 - 57-7 with, 15-3 without. +5 in wins on a 72 win squad. It's troubling that the Spurs improve defensively without him - but he still raises the ceiling of an elite squad.
'97 - 48-7 with, 21-6 without. +8 in wins - jumping from 64 win pace without to 72 win pace with.
'98 - Pippen misses 1/2 the year. Chicago goes 26-12. It's an aging Jordan, Rodman & Kukoc + filler and they generate a 56 win pace. Chicago is -5.2 in relative D Rating.

I understand the warts. I think that < 5% of NBA Teams in history could maximize him. I understand the stat chasing on the back half of his career and that '95 season is a major pain. But the reality is that he helped out significantly and lightning struck not once but twice for him. The history of the league cannot be written without him and he needs to be getting in soon.

Wrapping up - below is my original reasoning for Hardaway. I figure those still voting have read it by now which is why I focused on why I consider Hardaway superior to the other PG getting traction as my lead.



Spoiler:
I'm breaking the seal on Hardaway a little bit, so he's maybe been overlooked.

Here's my arguments for:

1.Hardaway is recognized as an elite player consistently in a competitive era

We are down to a handful of players that made All-NBA 5 X+ post-merger:

Carmelo Anthony
Tim Hardaway
Chris Webber
Yao Ming
Amare Stoudamire
Mitch Richmond

Of that group, if we filter it down further to players who made at least one first team squad, here's your list:

Tim Hardaway
Amare Stoudamire
Chris Webber

Of that group, just Hardaway & Webber finished Top 5 in MVP voting at any point in their career.

2. The Advanced Metrics/Impact Stats view him highly

-Shut up & Jam's NPI RAPM ratings (chained unweighted 5 year avg) has him as a low-level all-star from '97-'01. The two year '97 &'98 RAPM score him as about the 9th best player in a typical year with '97 scoring 2nd highest overall. While RAPM definitely gets to pick up his best year, his 2nd-4th best years are probably '91, '98, '92 (you could make an argument for flipping '91 & '98) so there's likely high impact years being omitted.

-Of the years he missed material time, his WOWY numbers are +4 in '92 & '95 each & +14 in '00.

-In '96 after trading for him, the Heat went 18-11 & were 24-29 pre-trade. The Warriors went 11-18 after the trade & were 25-28 pre-trade - indicating he upgraded the Heat & his loss caused a downgrade in the Warriors.

-Miami would have its best year by SRS when Hardaway - not Mourning - led the team in WS & '98 & '99 are virtually equal with Hardaway leading the team in WS.

3. From a Box Score standpoint, he is a very effective playmaker & scorer with strong turnover economy.

-Only four players in league history have recorded a 20 point, 9 assist >54% TS season while also achieving < 15% TOV economy:

Chris Paul, Tim Hardaway & James Harden. Hardaway is the only player to do so more than a decade ago.

-If you change the query to make it more pace based, & do 25 points + per 100 & > 40% assists, Chris Paul & Tony Parker are the only players to achieve it more than once.

Given that I'm the first to back him, I'm going to try and address some of the potential reasons why I'm the first:

1. Weak longevity - Hardaway logged 31 K Career Minutes and made All-NBA Teams 8 seasons apart.

2. Other point guards have been brought up as being better (Price in a separate thread, Archibald). - Hardaway has significantly more career WS than Price indicating better quality longevity; Archibald's career is very much a roller coaster. He put up huge stats on bad teams and so much of his career value is tied up in one year ('73) so the Archibald argument is a peak driven one.

3. Hardaway has a shaky playoff resume that saw him lose 4 times with HCA. Hardaway has a roller-coaster of a playoff resume - there's more valleys than peaks but there are a couple nice moments in key playoff victories (vs. '91 Spurs & vs. '97 Knicks).
3A. If you're going to note the rare company Hardaway is in other places, he's one of the rare players to lose in the 1st round while leading an SRS 5+ Team in WS.

'91 - Averages 25/11 plus 3 steals per game as the W's upset the Spurs in round 1 - losing to the Lakers in round 2. Good year.
'92 - Averaged 25/7/4 but shooting metrics are blah (51%) and the Warriors are upset by the Sonics. Defense was the bigger issue in the defeat (giving up 117 per 100 possessions to the Sonics). Mixed.
'96 - Heat are swept by the Bulls as Hardaway averages 18-6 on 57% TS but has 5 TO pg. Sub-par.
'97 - Hardaway gets his ass kicked by Penny in round 1 but redeems himself against the Knicks in round 2, culminating in a monster Game 7 saving the Heat. Mourning is outplayed decisively by Ewing but the Heat advance on the strength of Hardaway. Hardaway is miserable against the Bulls. Mixed.
'98 - The Heat are upset by the Knicks, but Hardaway plays well - averaging 26/7 on 59% TS. Good year.
'99 & 2000 are both bad years where the Heat lose to the Knicks w/ HCA.

4. Box Score Stats like Win Shares & VORP aren't fond of him

Tackling VORP first - We know that this is derived from BPM & BPM gives him some pretty ugly defensive scores. I think that this is a little bit of a miss for 3 reasons:

1) The RAPM data we have of his Miami years paints him as a neutral impact player on that end - he has no negative years from '97-'01 (but nothing impactful either).
2) He's an opportunistic ball thief who generates a fair amount of steals. You see him with solid defensive efforts in the video I posted above.
3) Other strong point guards of the era don't go off on him (cliff notes: He holds Isiah, Payton & Price below normal, KJ, Stockton & Magic get their typical #'s against him)

Stockton http://bkref.com/tiny/Hu3Wl
Isiah http://bkref.com/tiny/O2kos
Payton http://bkref.com/tiny/l1s9I
KJ http://bkref.com/tiny/QzMdm
Mark Price http://bkref.com/tiny/82snI
Magic http://bkref.com/tiny/Kh6fj
4) The Warrior teams he was on had garbage for rim protection

Tackling WS next: We know that WS has a big winners bias & Hardaway was stuck in a somewhat dysfunctional franchise for his first few years - that dovetails into:

5. Why did Golden State miss the playoffs twice including a 56 loss season with him as their leader?

The '95 season was a total mess for the Warriors. Don Nelson got fired midway through the year, Webber got traded for Tom Gougliotta (sp) who misses half the season, Mullin misses virtually the entire year and 14 dudes log 600+ minutes.

Your Top 8 in MInutes Played:
Spree
Hardaway
Keith Jennings
Clifford Rozier
Chris Gatling
David Wood
Tom Gugliotta (sp)
Victor Alexander

of course that team sucked - not to mention Hardaway was coming back from ACL Surgery & missed 20 games. But he still competed - averaged 20-9 while shooting 55% TS despite Spree being the only other player who can command any sort of gravity who was consistently playing.

They got ravaged with injuries the other time they missed the playoffs with him as their leader was '93.

Mullin misses 36 games
Marciuilinoius misses 52 games
Owens misses 45 games

You're not going to do great when you lose your 2nd-4th best players for 1/2 the season each. Hardaway still led a solid offense that was in the positive territory in Offensive Rating.

I'll wrap up with a great video of him in his athletic prime against the Lakers in the playoffs turning in a strong performance. Really one of my favorite players to watch growing up & I think his play earns him a spot on our list.



More to come on Webber when it's time - but my guess is he will be in a run-off soon & I can talk there.
pandrade83
Starter
Posts: 2,040
And1: 604
Joined: Jun 07, 2017
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#12 » by pandrade83 » Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:11 am

pandrade83 wrote:Primary: Tim Hardaway
Alternate: Dennis Rodman


Not sure how many people saw/didn't see my post on Hardaway vs. Tiny. Since Tiny is getting some traction, I figured I'd lead with this rather than make the same post on Hardaway for the 3rd straight time.

Here's some of the reasons I take Hardaway over Tiny:

A little bit better Box Metrics in a materially better era

Hardaway generates 85 Career WS to Tiny's 83.4 and about 2/3 of Tiny's WS comes pre-merger; I think that's note-worthy. Tiny posts a positive Box Score +/- just once post merger as well; showing a clear drop-off (though partially due to age). Hardaway also has marginally better PER (18.6 vs. 18.0). I'm willing to concede that Tiny's best BPM Years probably aren't captured ('72 & '73) but it's likely that Hardaway has a superior Career VORP Score as well since '74-'84 leave him with 9.5 vs. Hardaway's 34.6.

Solid defender vs. Weak Defender

I think the game clips + the RAPM Data + the steal frequency + some of the h2h matchups I've previously posted shows a fair picture of a capable defender. I wouldn't call Hardaway elite or anything - but he's solid. Archibald on the other hand was pretty bad on metrics & I'll add to it with some of the data from Owly:

After rookie season
The Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball 1971-72 – A Jim O’Brien Book [different to later Hollander edited books]
Has trouble on defense … Has tremendous body control, however, and could come a long way in that area this season.

After ’74 (4th year) but mainly in reference to earlier seasons as playing only
1975 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald will have to make an effort on defense or will have his problems with [incoming head coach Phil] Johnson. In the past he gave back many of the points he scored.
[player section:]

1977 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald can be pesky in a pressing situation, perhaps, but overall he’s a liability.
[player section:]

1978 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald can be a pest, but he can’t contain anyone over 40 minutes.
[player section:]

DNP in the prior, 77-78, season.
1979 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] In Archibald, Knight and Barnes, they have acquired offensive talents who can make it an exciting team, but a porous one as well.
[player section:]

1980 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald has lost a step and can’t guard his house.
[player section:]

1981 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald is adequate against players his size (both of them).
[player section:]

No mentions of his D in either section of the ’82 Handbook

1983 Complete Handbook of Pro Basketball
[team section:] Archibald can be beaten because of his size …
[player section:]

Playoffs

I was pretty candid about Hardaway's playoff performance - warts & all. But Tiny's indisputably and materially worse. He has a negative BPM every year, never even gets to 14 on PER, and the one time he made it in his prime, he went for 20-5 on 44% TS.

The case for Archibald is

Thinking about this from a pro-Tiny perspective, I think the biggest case is being really in love with that '73 season and valuing the peak he brings over the career value edge that Hardaway seems to have. He's part of a 3 man 30 pt 10 assist club with the Big O & Westbrook. He did so while shooting 56% TS which is pretty strong for the era and anchors the #1 offense while doing so without having a 3 point line and with Sam Lacey being the next best player on the team.

It's a great season. I get the appeal of that season - but if you're backing Tiny over Hardaway, you need to remember that Tiny didn't get in the playoffs that year. But that would be the only time before playing with Larry Bird where he was on a positive offense and for a point guard who was clearly a defensive liability, that seems problematic.

If I'm picking a guy for pure peak, I'd rather go with Kawhi or Walton.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We're all pretty familiar with the pros/cons of Rodman. It's been fleshed out really well. His head-case problems really bother people and I think that's reasonable.

He was a head case to deal with - I'm not 100% sure I'd want him on my team unless I'm a contender with strong AND vocal leadership. I get that. He's near the very top of the "fortunate to be in his situation" lottery - because if he had played anywhere but for the squads he did, he's not relevant. But he did win the lottery and his impact is huge. This isn't a situation where he'd be ignored if he had the same level of performance if he played on a non-contender.

Rodman's impact is of an elite caliber.

'90 - With Rodman coming off the bench: 26-14 - with him starting: 33-9. Detroit was more cohesive. +11 in wins (admittedly this has a lot of noise just talking about coming off bench vs. starting):
'93 - 36-26 with, 4-16 without. +32 in wins.
'94 - Upon joining the Spurs they go from +2.2 SRS to +5.
'95 - 40-9 with, 22-11 without. +12 in wins.
'96 - 57-7 with, 15-3 without. +5 in wins on a 72 win squad. It's troubling that the Spurs improve defensively without him - but he still raises the ceiling of an elite squad.
'97 - 48-7 with, 21-6 without. +8 in wins - jumping from 64 win pace without to 72 win pace with.
'98 - Pippen misses 1/2 the year. Chicago goes 26-12. It's an aging Jordan, Rodman & Kukoc + filler and they generate a 56 win pace. Chicago is -5.2 in relative D Rating.

I understand the warts. I think that < 5% of NBA Teams in history could maximize him. I understand the stat chasing on the back half of his career and that '95 season is a major pain. But the reality is that he helped out significantly and lightning struck not once but twice for him. The history of the league cannot be written without him and he needs to be getting in soon.

Wrapping up - below is my original reasoning for Hardaway. I figure those still voting have read it by now which is why I focused on why I consider Hardaway superior to the other PG getting traction as my lead.



Spoiler:
I'm breaking the seal on Hardaway a little bit, so he's maybe been overlooked.

Here's my arguments for:

1.Hardaway is recognized as an elite player consistently in a competitive era

We are down to a handful of players that made All-NBA 5 X+ post-merger:

Carmelo Anthony
Tim Hardaway
Chris Webber
Yao Ming
Amare Stoudamire
Mitch Richmond

Of that group, if we filter it down further to players who made at least one first team squad, here's your list:

Tim Hardaway
Amare Stoudamire
Chris Webber

Of that group, just Hardaway & Webber finished Top 5 in MVP voting at any point in their career.

2. The Advanced Metrics/Impact Stats view him highly

-Shut up & Jam's NPI RAPM ratings (chained unweighted 5 year avg) has him as a low-level all-star from '97-'01. The two year '97 &'98 RAPM score him as about the 9th best player in a typical year with '97 scoring 2nd highest overall. While RAPM definitely gets to pick up his best year, his 2nd-4th best years are probably '91, '98, '92 (you could make an argument for flipping '91 & '98) so there's likely high impact years being omitted.

-Of the years he missed material time, his WOWY numbers are +4 in '92 & '95 each & +14 in '00.

-In '96 after trading for him, the Heat went 18-11 & were 24-29 pre-trade. The Warriors went 11-18 after the trade & were 25-28 pre-trade - indicating he upgraded the Heat & his loss caused a downgrade in the Warriors.

-Miami would have its best year by SRS when Hardaway - not Mourning - led the team in WS & '98 & '99 are virtually equal with Hardaway leading the team in WS.

3. From a Box Score standpoint, he is a very effective playmaker & scorer with strong turnover economy.

-Only four players in league history have recorded a 20 point, 9 assist >54% TS season while also achieving < 15% TOV economy:

Chris Paul, Tim Hardaway & James Harden. Hardaway is the only player to do so more than a decade ago.

-If you change the query to make it more pace based, & do 25 points + per 100 & > 40% assists, Chris Paul & Tony Parker are the only players to achieve it more than once.

Given that I'm the first to back him, I'm going to try and address some of the potential reasons why I'm the first:

1. Weak longevity - Hardaway logged 31 K Career Minutes and made All-NBA Teams 8 seasons apart.

2. Other point guards have been brought up as being better (Price in a separate thread, Archibald). - Hardaway has significantly more career WS than Price indicating better quality longevity; Archibald's career is very much a roller coaster. He put up huge stats on bad teams and so much of his career value is tied up in one year ('73) so the Archibald argument is a peak driven one.

3. Hardaway has a shaky playoff resume that saw him lose 4 times with HCA. Hardaway has a roller-coaster of a playoff resume - there's more valleys than peaks but there are a couple nice moments in key playoff victories (vs. '91 Spurs & vs. '97 Knicks).
3A. If you're going to note the rare company Hardaway is in other places, he's one of the rare players to lose in the 1st round while leading an SRS 5+ Team in WS.

'91 - Averages 25/11 plus 3 steals per game as the W's upset the Spurs in round 1 - losing to the Lakers in round 2. Good year.
'92 - Averaged 25/7/4 but shooting metrics are blah (51%) and the Warriors are upset by the Sonics. Defense was the bigger issue in the defeat (giving up 117 per 100 possessions to the Sonics). Mixed.
'96 - Heat are swept by the Bulls as Hardaway averages 18-6 on 57% TS but has 5 TO pg. Sub-par.
'97 - Hardaway gets his ass kicked by Penny in round 1 but redeems himself against the Knicks in round 2, culminating in a monster Game 7 saving the Heat. Mourning is outplayed decisively by Ewing but the Heat advance on the strength of Hardaway. Hardaway is miserable against the Bulls. Mixed.
'98 - The Heat are upset by the Knicks, but Hardaway plays well - averaging 26/7 on 59% TS. Good year.
'99 & 2000 are both bad years where the Heat lose to the Knicks w/ HCA.

4. Box Score Stats like Win Shares & VORP aren't fond of him

Tackling VORP first - We know that this is derived from BPM & BPM gives him some pretty ugly defensive scores. I think that this is a little bit of a miss for 3 reasons:

1) The RAPM data we have of his Miami years paints him as a neutral impact player on that end - he has no negative years from '97-'01 (but nothing impactful either).
2) He's an opportunistic ball thief who generates a fair amount of steals. You see him with solid defensive efforts in the video I posted above.
3) Other strong point guards of the era don't go off on him (cliff notes: He holds Isiah, Payton & Price below normal, KJ, Stockton & Magic get their typical #'s against him)

Stockton http://bkref.com/tiny/Hu3Wl
Isiah http://bkref.com/tiny/O2kos
Payton http://bkref.com/tiny/l1s9I
KJ http://bkref.com/tiny/QzMdm
Mark Price http://bkref.com/tiny/82snI
Magic http://bkref.com/tiny/Kh6fj
4) The Warrior teams he was on had garbage for rim protection

Tackling WS next: We know that WS has a big winners bias & Hardaway was stuck in a somewhat dysfunctional franchise for his first few years - that dovetails into:

5. Why did Golden State miss the playoffs twice including a 56 loss season with him as their leader?

The '95 season was a total mess for the Warriors. Don Nelson got fired midway through the year, Webber got traded for Tom Gougliotta (sp) who misses half the season, Mullin misses virtually the entire year and 14 dudes log 600+ minutes.

Your Top 8 in MInutes Played:
Spree
Hardaway
Keith Jennings
Clifford Rozier
Chris Gatling
David Wood
Tom Gugliotta (sp)
Victor Alexander

of course that team sucked - not to mention Hardaway was coming back from ACL Surgery & missed 20 games. But he still competed - averaged 20-9 while shooting 55% TS despite Spree being the only other player who can command any sort of gravity who was consistently playing.

They got ravaged with injuries the other time they missed the playoffs with him as their leader was '93.

Mullin misses 36 games
Marciuilinoius misses 52 games
Owens misses 45 games

You're not going to do great when you lose your 2nd-4th best players for 1/2 the season each. Hardaway still led a solid offense that was in the positive territory in Offensive Rating.

I'll wrap up with a great video of him in his athletic prime against the Lakers in the playoffs turning in a strong performance. Really one of my favorite players to watch growing up & I think his play earns him a spot on our list.



More to come on Webber when it's time - but my guess is he will be in a run-off soon & I can talk there.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#13 » by trex_8063 » Thu Jan 25, 2018 5:18 pm

Reserved for content, will edit in later....
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#14 » by trex_8063 » Thu Jan 25, 2018 5:30 pm

1st vote: Carmelo Anthony

An impact study of Melo is a little bit of a mixed bag (skewing toward negative: just so we don't embark on another semantic debate with my labeling :wink: ). His RAPM's (the impact metric I tend to put the most faith in, fwiw) look a bit questionable [that is: below expectation] in many years. otoh, WOWY studies, and team performance relative to cast, don't look too bad at all for a player gaining traction in the early-mid 80's section of the list (better in these regards than Elton Brand, as noted in previous thread).

But as I've said elsewhere, I'm not comfortable putting all my eggs into one basket (and certainly not all into one that isn't a direct measure of "player goodness"). If one were to base ranking/assessment on all other factors and metrics (outside of the impact umbrella), he would conclude we're already 10+ places late on Carmelo Anthony.
With that in mind, I've a hard time putting him off any further.

Offensively he's clearly a pretty talented player. Ranged from a very good to near-elite scorer during his prime (despite spending much of that without terribly relevant play-makers around him). I've never been overly fond of his shot-selection (over-reliance on the mid-range), though that's what kept him in the "very good to near-elite" range (but never "elite", imo).

Not a particularly relevant playmaker, though certainly no worse than James Worthy, Dominique Wilkins, or Kawhi Leonard. And has been a very good rebounding SF (occ. SF/PF) in his career, and does provide some spacing.
A mostly weak defender with sporadic seasons of "OK" defense. I'm not considering this current season, though fwiw, it indicates to me what I've suspected: that Melo could play halfway respectable defense if deployed in a more offensively limited role-player capacity (as reported he was willing to do in the Olympics, fwiw); and defense being the primary thing that has held his impact down.
Longevity is actually pretty good by this point (considerably better than Webber, Kawhi, or Tiny; considering minutes, arguably better than Rodman, too).

Criticized as being difficult to integrate into a contender (somewhat speculative, imo), but at any rate a pretty decent floor-raiser (which carries more value [to me] than most seem to give it credit for; more on that later).


2nd vote: Rasheed Wallace
I'm switching gears again with my secondary pick. As noted in previous post itt, I get more and more uncomfortable with Rodman the more I ruminate on him. Sheed gives you more offensive potential, while he was also a top 3-5 defensive forward thru pretty much his entire prime; that he never got any All-D honors in his career is probably one of the biggest career snubs in NBA history (arguably bigger snub than Shawn Marion never receiving All-D honors).
While he's got his own "head case" issues, I never saw it as problematic as the previously alluded to meltdown Rodman had in '95. Sheed likely better longevity, too.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,573
And1: 8,207
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#15 » by trex_8063 » Thu Jan 25, 2018 5:32 pm

Thru post #14:

Carmelo Anthony - 2 (trex_8063, Clyde Frazier)
Tim Hardaway - 1 (pandrade83)
Mel Daniels - 1 (penbeast0)


Probably about 22 hours left till runoff.

Spoiler:
Ainosterhaspie wrote:.

eminence wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Owly wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

Texas Chuck wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

fpliii wrote:.

euroleague wrote:.

pandrade83 wrote:.

Hornet Mania wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

SactoKingsFan wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

RSCS3_ wrote:.

BasketballFan7 wrote:.

micahclay wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

RCM88x wrote:.

Tesla wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

kayess wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

MisterHibachi wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

mischievous wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

Bad Gatorade wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Cyrusman122000 wrote:.

Winsome Gerbil wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

wojoaderge wrote:.

TrueLAfan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Outside wrote:.

scabbarista wrote:.

janmagn wrote:.

Arman_tanzarian wrote:.

oldschooled wrote:.

Pablo Novi wrote:.

john248 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

Senior wrote:.

twolves97 wrote:.

CodeBreaker wrote:.

JoeMalburg wrote:.

dhsilv2 wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,820
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#16 » by penbeast0 » Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:07 pm

trex_8063 wrote: Sheed ... was also a top 3-5 defensive forward thru pretty much his entire prime; that he never got any All-D honors in his career is probably one of the biggest career snubs in NBA history (arguably bigger snub than Shawn Marion never receiving All-D honors)....


I would disagree on that. Rasheed Wallace was certainly capable of being an All-Defensive team player just as he was capable of leading a team offensively. But, unlike Marion, his motor and effort were pretty inconsistent. Marion was high energy, always flying around the court on both ends. Sheed would look like an all-NBA player on both ends for awhile then disappear for long stretches (or lose his temper but that's less of an issue for me). I think Rasheed is a reasonable choice here but I don't think his failure to get All-Defense awards is nearly as much of an issue as it was with Marion who was actually top 3 in DPOY voting one year but not All-D.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,240
And1: 9,820
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#17 » by penbeast0 » Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:10 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:...

Wow....knew grant would come up strong here, but I'm thinking I might jump Grant to the top and have Grant followed by Sheed. My only concern is having watched them both play, Rasheed could do more and I feel that should count. OK maybe you don't hvae to sell me on Grant too hard.


As I said in my previous post, Sheed "could" do more, but frequently didn't. Super talented but didn't perform up to level he was capable of though still a very good player for a long time.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,570
And1: 26,750
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#18 » by dhsilv2 » Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:39 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
trex_8063 wrote: Sheed ... was also a top 3-5 defensive forward thru pretty much his entire prime; that he never got any All-D honors in his career is probably one of the biggest career snubs in NBA history (arguably bigger snub than Shawn Marion never receiving All-D honors)....


I would disagree on that. Rasheed Wallace was certainly capable of being an All-Defensive team player just as he was capable of leading a team offensively. But, unlike Marion, his motor and effort were pretty inconsistent. Marion was high energy, always flying around the court on both ends. Sheed would look like an all-NBA player on both ends for awhile then disappear for long stretches (or lose his temper but that's less of an issue for me). I think Rasheed is a reasonable choice here but I don't think his failure to get All-Defense awards is nearly as much of an issue as it was with Marion who was actually top 3 in DPOY voting one year but not All-D.


Both are issues. Anyone have RAPM on Marion vs Rasheed on defense?

Trex? :)

I know both always showed up really highly, outstanding even.
User avatar
SactoKingsFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,236
And1: 2,760
Joined: Mar 15, 2014
       

Re: RE: Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#19 » by SactoKingsFan » Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:16 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
trex_8063 wrote: Sheed ... was also a top 3-5 defensive forward thru pretty much his entire prime; that he never got any All-D honors in his career is probably one of the biggest career snubs in NBA history (arguably bigger snub than Shawn Marion never receiving All-D honors)....


I would disagree on that. Rasheed Wallace was certainly capable of being an All-Defensive team player just as he was capable of leading a team offensively. But, unlike Marion, his motor and effort were pretty inconsistent. Marion was high energy, always flying around the court on both ends. Sheed would look like an all-NBA player on both ends for awhile then disappear for long stretches (or lose his temper but that's less of an issue for me). I think Rasheed is a reasonable choice here but I don't think his failure to get All-Defense awards is nearly as much of an issue as it was with Marion who was actually top 3 in DPOY voting one year but not All-D.


Both are issues. Anyone have RAPM on Marion vs Rasheed on defense?

Trex? :)

I know both always showed up really highly, outstanding even.
NPI DRAPM

Wallace
98: 2.6
99: 3.1
00: 1.5
01: 1.6
02: 1.8
03: 1.0
04: 2.5
05: 1.7
06: 1.2
07: .1
08: 1.5

Marion
01: 2.6
02: .5
03: .4
04: -.7
05: .5
06: .5
07: 1.1
08: 1.3
09: 1.1
10: .7
11: .1


Sent from my PH-1 using Tapatalk
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,570
And1: 26,750
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RE: Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #84 

Post#20 » by dhsilv2 » Fri Jan 26, 2018 12:17 am

SactoKingsFan wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
I would disagree on that. Rasheed Wallace was certainly capable of being an All-Defensive team player just as he was capable of leading a team offensively. But, unlike Marion, his motor and effort were pretty inconsistent. Marion was high energy, always flying around the court on both ends. Sheed would look like an all-NBA player on both ends for awhile then disappear for long stretches (or lose his temper but that's less of an issue for me). I think Rasheed is a reasonable choice here but I don't think his failure to get All-Defense awards is nearly as much of an issue as it was with Marion who was actually top 3 in DPOY voting one year but not All-D.


Both are issues. Anyone have RAPM on Marion vs Rasheed on defense?

Trex? :)

I know both always showed up really highly, outstanding even.
NPI DRAPM

Wallace
98: 2.6
99: 3.1
00: 1.5
01: 1.6
02: 1.8
03: 1.0
04: 2.5
05: 1.7
06: 1.2
07: .1
08: 1.5

Marion
01: 2.6
02: .5
03: .4
04: -.7
05: .5
06: .5
07: 1.1
08: 1.3
09: 1.1
10: .7
11: .1


Sent from my PH-1 using Tapatalk


interesting, not sure i'd trust NPI for just the defensive side. That's starting to get iffy. Is this the same person's RAPM by chance?

Return to Player Comparisons