PC Board OT Thread Take 4

Moderators: trex_8063, Doctor MJ, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Quotatious, Clyde Frazier

User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 31,818
And1: 19,847
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#361 » by E-Balla » Mon Mar 23, 2020 6:51 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:The question is really if we can learn from this and get back to the healthier mindset Americans used to have. People came out of WWII filled with competence, confidence, and optimism, and they made a tremendous amount happen. How do we get back to something like that?

This is an odd thing to say. Americans still have the same mindset they had back then and if anything that era birthed the mindset that's dooming us now.

Maybe you're getting it mixed up with the post depression era or something here.


Ever read this?
As we may think.

Basically, this was a guy strongly connected to the Manhattan Project and pioneers of what we now think of as Silicon Valley. This is him after WWII writing an article for a mainstream magazine in which he basically sketches out the user-interface of the internet as we know it today.

WWII was in the '40s, the dot com revolution was in the '90s, but the roots of the dot com revolution came from the leaders of the '40s. Guys who were making money to be sure - this guy founded Raytheon - but were thinking primarily about how to take humanity to the next level.

I don't see the man that helped create the idea for and secure the funding for the Manhattan Project as someone that was looking for ways to advance humanity as much as he was looking for ways to help America take over the globe.

Then you get Civil Rights Movements and all sorts of super-optimistic thinking that went through the next couple decades.

But why did we get the Civil Rights era? Was it because people generally realized their behavior was terrible? No it was because their behavior was so terrible people were fed up and basically forced the government to give them rights even though the general populace just wanted them to go home and shut up because they were personally living life well.

And I don't think there was too much optimism in that. There were over 100 race riots from 62 to 68, mass rioting is literally the opposite of a show of optimism. We're still having those same fights now, and I'm sure no one would talk about the "optimism" of people fighting that battle in 2020. It's all revisionist rose tinted lenses we're looking at the 50s and 60s with but honestly not much has changed culturally tangible ways since then and where things have changed we've improved.

Now, did the optimism back then influence the counter-cynicism that has been killing our culture since Nixon for the past half-century? Yes, but while you can criticize some of that optimism as misplaced the reality is that the big things we've achieved since then were basically thought through in that post-WWII time period.

I do understand that the whole "Everything was better in the '50s" thing is a myth. I'm not talking about nuclear families and pretending non-white people don't exist, I'm talking about empowered smart people actively taking humanity forward.

By creating the internet? Is that the only mark of progress? What about the creation of nuclear weapons? The destruction of the public social safety net and death of New Deal politics following the inclusion of ALL Americans in government programs? The creation of the TV was great but the culture of the consensus of the post war era silencing anyone that wasn't part of what we now call a destructive American mindset? Not so much. The optimism from back then is still around and part of the culture it seems to me, they're just the parts of the culture we hate the most.

Since then we've been moving in a direction toward currently leadership which tries to make up for a lock of competence with bluster. A "C'mon, we're Americans, we'll do it better than anyone else because we're Americans!", which resonates with people because back when people Trump's age were growing up, the US won everything with a tremendous amount of rapidly growing technical competence. We had advantages of geography over other countries to be sure, but it still required a ton of competence and trusting of experts to do their thing. And now we have a guy in charge who openly mocks "experts".

It resonates with some people in that age group. Ask my grandparents how great America is even back then and I guarantee you'll get a totally different answer, and that's my main point here. Your idea of the era of consensus is undeniably wholly informed by looking at how white males felt about that era. The Civil Rights Movement wasn't optimistic. It never was. If it was about optimism there wouldn't have been so much violence and they wouldn't have evolved into the socialist radicals of the 70s.

McCarthyism didn't define the '50s dude. McCarthy was an upstart trying to grab attention who within a few years was hated by almost everybody. To see the '50s in terms of him instead of Ike is not focusing on who actually had power. While McCarthy was seen as a has-been joke while the man who defined American government in the '50s, Ike, was still president.

McCarthyism/the 2nd Red Scare by most estimates made over 10 thousand people lose their jobs. Sure it doesn't define the 50s but the main point is that anything I can think about in the 50s, the building of suburbia, the red scare, the civil rights movement, the culture of the consensus, etc. are all undeniably negative and created the exact culture you're saying stinks now. And I'm not saying it gradually led to the creation of the current culture but that the creation of that culture gradually led society to where it is now. America's growth is completely stunted thanks to that post WWII mindset of American exceptionalism.

And Eisenhower's presidency and accomplishments are a good proof of the issues of that mindset. American's use cars way too much and our transportation infrastructure went from best in the world to lagging behind most of the first world thanks to all the rails we removed to build highways and the selling of our public rail infrastructure to Amtrak a decade after he left office. Of course he also used highway building as a way to destroy the wealth in majority minority communities.

Or what about the Eisenhower Doctrine which got us involved in the Middle East which... Yeah...

Or what about the mass firings of homosexuals with government jobs?

Or what about his weakening of New Deal policies?

On the other hand, the fear-your-fellow-American mentality that McCarthy used got repackaged by Nixon as "the Silent Majority", and Republicans have basically been running on that after since (with Trump as a clear cut case of it). So yeah, McCarthy's approach was later very influential within his party, but he has nothing to do with why big things of government accomplishment came out of that time, which is what I'm talking about.

I mean the biggest examples of government accomplishment in the 50s if you ask me in terms of domestic policy was the creation of highways, which again came with the caveat that it was used to destroy minority wealth around the country. NATO is the biggest thing to come out of foreign policy, and that's great at least.

I just don't think in general I'd want to wax poetic about the optimism of people manically attempting to take over the globe.

When it comes to positive people attempting to make the world a better place in that era they all got killed, imprisoned, or exiled. There's not many people that were well respected then that would be anywhere near well respected if still alive, and the people you're probably looking back on positively were hated. It's an era with mindsets so **** we've had to revise it more than any other in our history books.
"The hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who remain neutral in times of great moral conflict." - Martin Luther King
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 16,033
And1: 16,870
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#362 » by Clyde Frazier » Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:12 pm

Read on Twitter


Obviously plenty of different charities you can donate to, but cool to see a player who fell on hard times turn his life around and do something good.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 41,339
And1: 9,303
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Treys are for 'Kicks!...and Steph Curry
   

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#363 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:46 pm

E-Balla wrote:I don't see the man that helped create the idea for and secure the funding for the Manhattan Project as someone that was looking for ways to advance humanity as much as he was looking for ways to help America take over the globe.


Okay listen: I'm not someone looking to whitewash history here. It's understandable for someone to be anti-Pax Americana above plenty of other things. None of it changes the fact that this did a tremendous amount moving the society's STEM efficacy.

What's tricky here is that cynicism toward American propaganda makes sense, but too much cynicism in a society's diet tends to lead to uselessness. Whatever America should be, what we can definitely say that it's less capable of taking on big things than it used to be.

E-Balla wrote:But why did we get the Civil Rights era? Was it because people generally realized their behavior was terrible? No it was because their behavior was so terrible people were fed up and basically forced the government to give them rights even though the general populace just wanted them to go home and shut up because they were personally living life well.

And I don't think there was too much optimism in that. There were over 100 race riots from 62 to 68, mass rioting is literally the opposite of a show of optimism. We're still having those same fights now, and I'm sure no one would talk about the "optimism" of people fighting that battle in 2020. It's all revisionist rose tinted lenses we're looking at the 50s and 60s with but honestly not much has changed culturally tangible ways since then and where things have changed we've improved.


Minority groups came out of WWII with a growing confidence in their ability to make change as well.

Again, I'm not whitewashing here. The good and the bad, America was just filled with boldness after the success of WWII. That boldness, amongst other thing, caused all sort of changes with all sorts of reactions, it took a lot to do what they did at that time.

(As I say this, the growth of new media was part of all of this as well.)

E-Balla wrote:By creating the internet? Is that the only mark of progress? What about the creation of nuclear weapons? The destruction of the public social safety net and death of New Deal politics following the inclusion of ALL Americans in government programs? The creation of the TV was great but the culture of the consensus of the post war era silencing anyone that wasn't part of what we now call a destructive American mindset? Not so much. The optimism from back then is still around and part of the culture it seems to me, they're just the parts of the culture we hate the most.


Jesus f-ing Christ. And now I have to go away for a while again because dealing with **** like this pisses me off too much nowadays.

Goodbye.
In another world...
Your Longshoremen of Long Beach...

And now introducing...
The Song of Westeros...
LeBron James
John Stockton
Bobby Jones
Rudy Gobert
Khris Middleton
Connie Hawkins
Otto Porter
Ryan Anderson
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,124
And1: 44,106
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#364 » by bondom34 » Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:44 am

Finally read ElGee's book after all these years. Was familiar with the concepts obviously from here and hearing/reading him elsewhere, and still have a few disagreements in ways, but great read.
FoundANewSlant wrote:it's really fundamental defensive flaws exhibited here by Westbrook, PG, and Adams that put Melo into vulnerable positions here yet you can't recognize or explain it.

So Paul George is the reason Carmelo Anthony struggled on defense all these years...
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 16,701
And1: 11,681
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#365 » by HeartBreakKid » Wed Mar 25, 2020 5:35 am

bondom34 wrote:Finally read ElGee's book after all these years. Was familiar with the concepts obviously from here and hearing/reading him elsewhere, and still have a few disagreements in ways, but great read.

Whats his book called
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,124
And1: 44,106
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#366 » by bondom34 » Wed Mar 25, 2020 5:37 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Finally read ElGee's book after all these years. Was familiar with the concepts obviously from here and hearing/reading him elsewhere, and still have a few disagreements in ways, but great read.

Whats his book called

Thinking Basketball
FoundANewSlant wrote:it's really fundamental defensive flaws exhibited here by Westbrook, PG, and Adams that put Melo into vulnerable positions here yet you can't recognize or explain it.

So Paul George is the reason Carmelo Anthony struggled on defense all these years...
User avatar
Jaivl
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,683
And1: 3,843
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coru√Īa, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#367 » by Jaivl » Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:42 pm

I hadn't had an asthma episode in years. And of course, the first had to be yesterday. What a scare.
Maf wrote:I'd undestand if anyone had KG outside top ten PF's. Having him top five all-time? Often I jokingly rank Kyle Korver as the GOAT but I never try to fake serious discussion about it.

ShawnKemp96 wrote:Infact he made a lot more steals than the statisticians think.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 16,701
And1: 11,681
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#368 » by HeartBreakKid » Thu Mar 26, 2020 11:07 am

Jaivl wrote:I hadn't had an asthma episode in years. And of course, the first had to be yesterday. What a scare.


*gives you a punch to the gut
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - Mavericks and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - Mavericks and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 50,307
And1: 35,698
Joined: May 19, 2012
         

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#369 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Mar 26, 2020 8:39 pm

with lots of time on my hands these days I found myself thinking about the time that the franchise I root for decided that Robert Pack and Shawn Bradley were cornerstone pieces. Mavs had some dark days pre-Dirk man.
FNQ wrote: Once JJ is healed, the Mavs Big 3 are gonna be something..
User avatar
PockyCandy
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 8,761
And1: 17,741
Joined: Jan 27, 2015
Location: Making videos that you watch
   

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#370 » by PockyCandy » Thu Mar 26, 2020 11:42 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:with lots of time on my hands these days I found myself thinking about the time that the franchise I root for decided that Robert Pack and Shawn Bradley were cornerstone pieces. Mavs had some dark days pre-Dirk man.


At least Robert Pack could throw down some sick dunks?

Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 8,502
And1: 4,274
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
   

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#371 » by trex_8063 » Fri Mar 27, 2020 6:24 pm

Bidofo wrote:
MisterHibachi wrote:I was watching Clippers Lakers highlights from earlier this month, and man I miss watching even Rondo play.

Okay that's it, the season MUST start NOW.

:D


Quoted you all from another thread, since I didn't want to derail there....

Anyway, last night I found myself watching some of the old game footage the Turner Sports stations we have are currently offering: watched most of an NCAA tourney 1st Round game from 1989. Was Princeton (16-seed) against Georgetown (1-seed). Great game. Georgetown just barely escaped with a 1 pt win (Princeton had the final shot with a chance to win, too). Bunch of unknowns on Princeton, while Georgetown had a freshman Alonzo Mourning, Jaren Jackson, as well as PG Charles Smith and forward John Turner (both of whom had brief stints in the NBA--->washed out quick).

Not near as embarrassing an admission as watching Rondo, I suppose ;).
All-Time NE Fantasy Team
PG-Chauncey Billups (06-08)/Terry Porter (91-93)
SG-George Gervin (78-80)/Danny Green
SF-R. Barry (67-70)/Bruce Bowen (04-06)
PF-Ho Grant (92-94)/D. Cowens (74-76)
C-D. Robinson (94-96)/Kevin Willis (92-94)
Bill Sharman (coach)
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,124
And1: 44,106
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#372 » by bondom34 » Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:10 am

Learned not to respond to NBA twitter :lol:

Cut/bench/trade was posted for Westbrook/Irving/Rose in their primes. Apparently there is some realm where Irving is the best in his prime? Had to report and block some dude for going off when he replied to me and I said Irving was the worst. What a weird place social media is.
FoundANewSlant wrote:it's really fundamental defensive flaws exhibited here by Westbrook, PG, and Adams that put Melo into vulnerable positions here yet you can't recognize or explain it.

So Paul George is the reason Carmelo Anthony struggled on defense all these years...
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 15,689
And1: 8,538
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#373 » by Colbinii » Sat Mar 28, 2020 12:52 pm

bondom34 wrote:Learned not to respond to NBA twitter :lol:

Cut/bench/trade was posted for Westbrook/Irving/Rose in their primes. Apparently there is some realm where Irving is the best in his prime? Had to report and block some dude for going off when he replied to me and I said Irving was the worst. What a weird place social media is.


Irving is the best, he won a championship. It's why Fisher is better than Chris Paul.
tsherkin wrote:Locked due to absence of adult conversation.


penbeast0 wrote:Guys, if you don't have anything to say, don't post.


E-Balla wrote:LeBron is Jeff George.
User avatar
eminence
Head Coach
Posts: 7,211
And1: 4,003
Joined: Mar 07, 2015
 

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#374 » by eminence » Sat Mar 28, 2020 1:49 pm

Fisher is probably underappreciated. Though not even close to CP3 obviously.
'17-'18 APBR Win Projections Champion (1st of 20)
'18-'19 5th of 18
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,124
And1: 44,106
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#375 » by bondom34 » Sat Mar 28, 2020 6:12 pm

I now want to see someone start this thread (and I expect Colbinii to be there for FIsh :D).
FoundANewSlant wrote:it's really fundamental defensive flaws exhibited here by Westbrook, PG, and Adams that put Melo into vulnerable positions here yet you can't recognize or explain it.

So Paul George is the reason Carmelo Anthony struggled on defense all these years...
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,124
And1: 44,106
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#376 » by bondom34 » Sat Mar 28, 2020 6:36 pm

Also sorry this is somewhat basketball but these are only getting worse. Who runs these accounts.

Read on Twitter
FoundANewSlant wrote:it's really fundamental defensive flaws exhibited here by Westbrook, PG, and Adams that put Melo into vulnerable positions here yet you can't recognize or explain it.

So Paul George is the reason Carmelo Anthony struggled on defense all these years...
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,124
And1: 44,106
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#377 » by bondom34 » Sun Mar 29, 2020 2:21 am

On the plus side I got an ElGee sighting on Twitter (and him using "impressiveness of bag" is now something I have to do more of.

Read on Twitter


Wish he'd drop by sometime.
FoundANewSlant wrote:it's really fundamental defensive flaws exhibited here by Westbrook, PG, and Adams that put Melo into vulnerable positions here yet you can't recognize or explain it.

So Paul George is the reason Carmelo Anthony struggled on defense all these years...
Odinn21
Pro Prospect
Posts: 855
And1: 590
Joined: May 19, 2019
   

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#378 » by Odinn21 » Sun Mar 29, 2020 2:12 pm

I have been watching some tennis videos, extended highlights on YouTube. Came across 2018 US Open Women's Singles Finals. It reminded me how much I hate Serena Williams. She'd be in my top 5 sportsperson (across all the sports) that I actually hate.
User avatar
PockyCandy
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 8,761
And1: 17,741
Joined: Jan 27, 2015
Location: Making videos that you watch
   

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#379 » by PockyCandy » Mon Mar 30, 2020 12:57 am

bondom34 wrote:Also sorry this is somewhat basketball but these are only getting worse. Who runs these accounts.

Read on Twitter


lmaooooooooo

At least a lot of the comments were taking Chris Paul. I've seen facebook things like that where people unironically call Allen Iverson a top 5 player of all time.
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 16,701
And1: 11,681
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: PC Board OT Thread Take 4 

Post#380 » by HeartBreakKid » Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:31 am

I had Derek Fisher's rookie card. What ever happened to sports cards?

Return to Player Comparisons