Better Suns acquisition: Barkley, Nash or Paul
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Better Suns acquisition: Barkley, Nash or Paul
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,415
- And1: 1,013
- Joined: Feb 19, 2012
Better Suns acquisition: Barkley, Nash or Paul
I know one is incomplete but you can project.
Re: Better Suns acquisition: Barkley, Nash or Paul
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,572
- And1: 3,245
- Joined: Mar 21, 2013
-
Re: Better Suns acquisition: Barkley, Nash or Paul
Just off Nash winning multiple MVPs, I think you have to say him.
Re: Better Suns acquisition: Barkley, Nash or Paul
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,104
- And1: 3,912
- Joined: Oct 04, 2018
Re: Better Suns acquisition: Barkley, Nash or Paul
Seems to be Nash clearly. Barkley gave them 3 prime years at best, Paul gave them 0 even though he’s still really good.
Re: Better Suns acquisition: Barkley, Nash or Paul
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,868
- And1: 13,670
- Joined: Jan 20, 2007
-
Re: Better Suns acquisition: Barkley, Nash or Paul
1. Nash easy #1. Gave the Suns several years of contention, turning around a franchise that was going into nowhere into a team similar to the 90s Jazz/Sonics or Teens Thunder, a club everyone but the rings or you're a loser crowd recognizes played at a title level.
huge gap
2. Barkley: his impact on Phoenix is overstated but he still was a lot closer to his peak than Paul and played a larger role too.
gap
3. Paul
huge gap
2. Barkley: his impact on Phoenix is overstated but he still was a lot closer to his peak than Paul and played a larger role too.
gap
3. Paul