2000 D-Rob vs. 2013 Duncan
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
2000 D-Rob vs. 2013 Duncan
-
SelakStreet
- Junior
- Posts: 333
- And1: 51
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
2000 D-Rob vs. 2013 Duncan
Who was the better player after their prime years were over?
Re: 2000 D-Rob vs. 2013 Duncan
-
trex_8063
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 12,605
- And1: 8,235
- Joined: Feb 24, 2013
-
Re: 2000 D-Rob vs. 2013 Duncan
I voted '00 Robinson, but it was a pinch off the cuff, and now I'm second-guessing it. '13 Duncan was a little better than I remembered [by the numbers, I mean]. Pretty close.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
Re: 2000 D-Rob vs. 2013 Duncan
-
No-more-rings
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,104
- And1: 3,912
- Joined: Oct 04, 2018
Re: 2000 D-Rob vs. 2013 Duncan
I voted Duncan. Drob probably holds the defensive advantage by that point, but I feel despite them both being past prime, their offensive advantages and weaknesses still hold. The difference for me is i still trust Duncan more to get tough buckets in crunch time, something we actually seen a lot from him in those playoffs. I don’t doubt Drob probably grades out better in impact stuff, so it probably depends on team construction, I don’t think Drob in place of Duncan get within seconds of a title.