Replaced Patrick Ewing with Hakeem for the Knicks in 1986 to 2000

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Homer38
RealGM
Posts: 12,170
And1: 13,700
Joined: Dec 04, 2013

Replaced Patrick Ewing with Hakeem for the Knicks in 1986 to 2000 

Post#1 » by Homer38 » Fri Jun 24, 2022 12:24 pm

How many titles the knicks would have been able to win?
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Replaced Patrick Ewing with Hakeem for the Knicks in 1986 to 2000 

Post#2 » by prolific passer » Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:54 pm

Hakeem, Oakley, Xavier, Wilkins, Mark Jackson sound scary.
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: Replaced Patrick Ewing with Hakeem for the Knicks in 1986 to 2000 

Post#3 » by scrabbarista » Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:25 pm

.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Replaced Patrick Ewing with Hakeem for the Knicks in 1986 to 2000 

Post#4 » by prolific passer » Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:49 pm

Also does Hakeem adjust his game from 93-97 like he did in real life? He would have the shooters to do so in Starks, Harper, Hubert Davis, and Houston.
No-more-rings
Head Coach
Posts: 7,104
And1: 3,912
Joined: Oct 04, 2018

Re: Replaced Patrick Ewing with Hakeem for the Knicks in 1986 to 2000 

Post#5 » by No-more-rings » Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:19 pm

I think 94 is an easy win. Hakeem with that Knick cast would’ve stomped whoever faces them out of the West. They’d be serious contenders in 93 likely even favorites that year, and 92 is an interesting season too even with Hakeem having a subpar regular season because we know his tendency to rise up in the playoffs. Seems unlikely they get by the Bulls, but if somehow they did I wouldn’t favor anyone else. 95 is interesting too..do we assume that Ewing is on the Rockets? Either way it doesn’t matter since we’d probably be looking at Knicks vs Spurs. I think the Knicks likely take this year as well with Mj’s retirement. That’s about where their contention ends with Hakeem aging and MJ coming back. That old Hakeem changes nothing against the Spurs in 1999.

So overall, 94 seems like a sure thing, 95 feels very likely and 93 has a good chance though still probably less than 50%. The timing would be in his favor just like in real life, he peaks while MJ is retired.
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,932
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: Replaced Patrick Ewing with Hakeem for the Knicks in 1986 to 2000 

Post#6 » by OhayoKD » Sat Jun 25, 2022 9:04 am

No-more-rings wrote:I think 94 is an easy win. Hakeem with that Knick cast would’ve stomped whoever faces them out of the West. They’d be serious contenders in 93 likely even favorites that year, and 92 is an interesting season too even with Hakeem having a subpar regular season because we know his tendency to rise up in the playoffs. Seems unlikely they get by the Bulls, but if somehow they did I wouldn’t favor anyone else. 95 is interesting too..do we assume that Ewing is on the Rockets? Either way it doesn’t matter since we’d probably be looking at Knicks vs Spurs. I think the Knicks likely take this year as well with Mj’s retirement. That’s about where their contention ends with Hakeem aging and MJ coming back. That old Hakeem changes nothing against the Spurs in 1999.

So overall, 94 seems like a sure thing, 95 feels very likely and 93 has a good chance though still probably less than 50%. The timing would be in his favor just like in real life, he peaks while MJ is retired.

The bulls were taken to 7 by the knicks in 92 despite ewing not being good on offense. Bulls-Knicks was also pretty close in 93.

92 and 93 hakeem is a pretty massive upgrade so I think rockets probablly win in 92 and 93.
Ginoboleee
Sophomore
Posts: 210
And1: 75
Joined: Jun 19, 2022

Re: Replaced Patrick Ewing with Hakeem for the Knicks in 1986 to 2000 

Post#7 » by Ginoboleee » Sat Jun 25, 2022 4:50 pm

Answer: Lots.

What would happen if you swapped out Kenny Smith for Michael Jordan? The original question is almost this extreme.

As I wrote in the post on Moses/Robinson/Ewing, I think Ewing is somewhere between mildly and significantly over-rated.
Life it is not just a series of calculations and a sum total of statistics, it's about experience, it's about participation, it is something more complex and more interesting than what is obvious.
Libeskind

Statistics are no substitute for judgment.
Clay

Return to Player Comparisons