PCProductions wrote:ardee wrote:David Robinson 5 year peak: 28.2 PER, .586 TS%, .263 WS/48, 9.0 BPM
Hakeem Olajuwon 5 year peak: 25.4 PER, .564 TS%, .191 WS/48, 5.8 BPM
Tells you just about squat.
And isn't the agreement that D-Rob was probably the better player in the regular season? Hakeem made his name in the playoffs, primarily.
I don’t think that was necessarily the understanding. Most would believe it was close during the RS, but not that D-Rob was definitively the better player. But Hakeem certainly does get clear separation over Robinson based on postseason play.
A similar thing happens for Kobe/Curry when you compare the two also. Curry’s efficiency dips and Kobe’s rises:
Kobe 5 year peak(ps): 29.8PPG, 5.7RPG, 5.4APG, 57%TS
Curry 4 year peak(ps): 26.8PPG, 5.6RPG, 5.9APG, 61%TS
Kobe played 79 games over his stretch, Curry 71. Curry’s TS% dips about -4%, Kobe’s increases 0.5%. Moreover, numbers aside, it just seemed like Kobe was playing his best basketball come playoffs, and was harder to stop(and injuries weren’t a concern).
Also, TS% seems to be skewed toward better shooters(I believe 3 pointers count for 135% within the stat; free throws a little undervalued/3 point plays not really accounted for, but within the stat they would technically be worth 100%) so I think it overexaggerates the difference a bit. But then Kobe was never Mr.Efficiency anyway, and everyone is judged by the same stat/formula, so it is what it is.
I think it’s close between the two; Curry peaked a little higher and his 3 point shooting is more game changing. Kobe’s postseason play was probably a little better, and his offense a little more resilient.