thebigbird wrote:parsnips33 wrote:It's so interesting that the LeBron defender strategy has been tearing down the guy that just beat your guy in 5 and swept him the year before
Wouldn't it be more honorable to go out like that to a legit all-time great rather than some overhyped pretender?
I have a lot to learn
I’ve spent two decades watching LeBron get s*** on basically on a daily basis. At 39 years old the media still holds him to a higher standard than literally anyone else in the NBA. The Nuggets beat the Lakers with 39 year old LeBron playing outstanding and the conversation became “Jokic is the best since Jordan,” “Jokic is better than peak LeBron ever was,” etc. Hell yeah I’m going to enjoy it when his team blows a 3-2 lead, losing game 6 by 45 points and blowing a 15 point halftime lead in game 7.
Undeniably, Lebron hate has surpassed anything any other player has "witnessed"
I had to. Sorry. Now, a troll would say that's in response to all the accolades he received in the early days. Yes, that's stupid, but they're trolls. The objective take, about as objective as anything can be, is he is on the Mt. Rushmore of the NBA. A GOAT candidate. As for the media idiots you chronicled up there? Not a rational mind (real or acted) up there. Charles, while entertaining is simply dumb. If, and ONLY if, James has been sputtering and playing poorly these last couple of years, his point would be valid. But, obviously, it isn't. Lebron is still a top 15 player in this league at age 39, which to any rational thinker reinforces his case for GOATdom and/or the place on the NBA Mt. Rushmore. And the "My Sauces" imbecile, Broussard? I'm not sure why in a league where the players are all professional millionaires the "leader" has to cop to the majority of the blame, when he is the least of it (AD was maybe the least that series but the point remans as James was great, too). No, the other PROFESSIONAL millionaires should shoulder the blame as it was relatively more their fault. And Skip? Real or acted he is simply an moron.