RSCD3_ wrote:Russell Westbrook has the closest thing to conqueror's haki that ive ever seen lol
I seriously think he has an adverse effect on his opponents with his intimidation
Russell D. Goat
Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier
RSCD3_ wrote:Russell Westbrook has the closest thing to conqueror's haki that ive ever seen lol
I seriously think he has an adverse effect on his opponents with his intimidation
spearsy23 wrote:bondom34 wrote:Yep, the thing is, I consider myself to mostly be an analytics fan, but Russ just defies everything I think about the game in literally every way imaginable. This team was 3-10 at one point, and its not just missing KD, though that's the biggest issue obviously. They went a stretch w/o Adams, now Ibaka, Collison, Jackson was essentially tanking this season, and they've never had a stable lineup. I'd give the MVP at this point to Harden based on the fact that he's in a similar situation and done it a few more games, but as crazy as it seems, I'd put Russ ahead of Curry. Curry's got at least 2/3 guys on that team who are at Ibaka's caliber this season, and they've had essentially zero injuries.
3-12, don't shortchange him![]()
And I'm in the same boat, but Russ isn't necessarily defying analytics, he's defying the way we originally thought. Really it's just his ts% that looks 'bad' and it's above average. He impacts the game around scoring AND is a volume scorer. It really makes me wonder if we've misjudged Iverson.
Shot Clock wrote:spearsy23 wrote:bondom34 wrote:Yep, the thing is, I consider myself to mostly be an analytics fan, but Russ just defies everything I think about the game in literally every way imaginable. This team was 3-10 at one point, and its not just missing KD, though that's the biggest issue obviously. They went a stretch w/o Adams, now Ibaka, Collison, Jackson was essentially tanking this season, and they've never had a stable lineup. I'd give the MVP at this point to Harden based on the fact that he's in a similar situation and done it a few more games, but as crazy as it seems, I'd put Russ ahead of Curry. Curry's got at least 2/3 guys on that team who are at Ibaka's caliber this season, and they've had essentially zero injuries.
3-12, don't shortchange him![]()
And I'm in the same boat, but Russ isn't necessarily defying analytics, he's defying the way we originally thought. Really it's just his ts% that looks 'bad' and it's above average. He impacts the game around scoring AND is a volume scorer. It really makes me wonder if we've misjudged Iverson.
I don't remember anyone suggesting you can't impact games with volume scoring on low efficiency. Most people just suggest you would impact it more with better shot selection.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Jaivl wrote:Then again, Iverson was no Westbrook.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Shot Clock wrote:spearsy23 wrote:bondom34 wrote:Yep, the thing is, I consider myself to mostly be an analytics fan, but Russ just defies everything I think about the game in literally every way imaginable. This team was 3-10 at one point, and its not just missing KD, though that's the biggest issue obviously. They went a stretch w/o Adams, now Ibaka, Collison, Jackson was essentially tanking this season, and they've never had a stable lineup. I'd give the MVP at this point to Harden based on the fact that he's in a similar situation and done it a few more games, but as crazy as it seems, I'd put Russ ahead of Curry. Curry's got at least 2/3 guys on that team who are at Ibaka's caliber this season, and they've had essentially zero injuries.
3-12, don't shortchange him![]()
And I'm in the same boat, but Russ isn't necessarily defying analytics, he's defying the way we originally thought. Really it's just his ts% that looks 'bad' and it's above average. He impacts the game around scoring AND is a volume scorer. It really makes me wonder if we've misjudged Iverson.
I don't remember anyone suggesting you can't impact games with volume scoring on low efficiency. Most people just suggest you would impact it more with better shot selection.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
spearsy23 wrote:Shot Clock wrote:spearsy23 wrote:3-12, don't shortchange him![]()
And I'm in the same boat, but Russ isn't necessarily defying analytics, he's defying the way we originally thought. Really it's just his ts% that looks 'bad' and it's above average. He impacts the game around scoring AND is a volume scorer. It really makes me wonder if we've misjudged Iverson.
I don't remember anyone suggesting you can't impact games with volume scoring on low efficiency. Most people just suggest you would impact it more with better shot selection.
Then you obviously aren't paying attention. There is a large, and vocal, contingent that are of the opinion Westbrook sucks and wouldn't want him on their team.
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
Bergmaniac wrote:Westbrook is having so much fun playing the pick and roll game with Kanter and McGary, bigs who are great at catching the ball on the move and finishing. After years of Kendrick Perkins who is literally the worst big man in the league at this it's quite a change for him and is a big reason his assists has increased quite a bit since Kanter came. It was always obvious that he would massively benefit from playing with such big men and he's proving it with each passing game.
PockyCandy wrote:spearsy23 wrote:Shot Clock wrote:
I don't remember anyone suggesting you can't impact games with volume scoring on low efficiency. Most people just suggest you would impact it more with better shot selection.
Then you obviously aren't paying attention. There is a large, and vocal, contingent that are of the opinion Westbrook sucks and wouldn't want him on their team.
I'd say that those people have been drowned out by the Westbrook supporters the last few months. I'd take him on the Lakers in a heartbeat. My opinion is somewhere in the middle of the two extremes, though. He definitely does not suck; Westbrook is one of the best players in the league and is very entertaining to watch. However, he's not the best player in the league/better than healthy Durant, and would help his team if he was more selective with his shots (this applies only when Ibaka and Durant are healthy, because a contested Westbrook shot >>>>>>>> whatever crap Dion Waiters hurls at the rim).
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
bondom34 wrote:If it improves, and his defense gets back to his usual, I see no real holes in him.
JordansBulls wrote:The Warriors are basically a good college team until they meet a team with bigs in the NBA.
PaulieWal wrote:bondom34 wrote:If it improves, and his defense gets back to his usual, I see no real holes in him.
Except for the one in his face for which he wears the mask right now.
Truth be told, he will always remain polarizing for different reasons. Bill Simmons said it best: the mistakes he makes are sometimes so glaring that they detract from the all the good he does (paraphrasing here).
I have no doubt in my mind that if he were fully healthy and didn't miss any time he could do what Harden is doing with the Rockets. Neither of those guys are doing any real damage in the playoffs though if they don't get KD and Howard back healthy.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
bondom34 wrote:PaulieWal wrote:bondom34 wrote:If it improves, and his defense gets back to his usual, I see no real holes in him.
Except for the one in his face for which he wears the mask right now.
Truth be told, he will always remain polarizing for different reasons. Bill Simmons said it best: the mistakes he makes are sometimes so glaring that they detract from the all the good he does (paraphrasing here).
I have no doubt in my mind that if he were fully healthy and didn't miss any time he could do what Harden is doing with the Rockets. Neither of those guys are doing any real damage in the playoffs though if they don't get KD and Howard back healthy.
Yup, for once I agree with Simmons. And to be honest, I'd put him second in MVP right now, with Harden first and Curry third, though I'll surely be roasted for that.
JordansBulls wrote:The Warriors are basically a good college team until they meet a team with bigs in the NBA.
PaulieWal wrote:bondom34 wrote:PaulieWal wrote:
Except for the one in his face for which he wears the mask right now.
Truth be told, he will always remain polarizing for different reasons. Bill Simmons said it best: the mistakes he makes are sometimes so glaring that they detract from the all the good he does (paraphrasing here).
I have no doubt in my mind that if he were fully healthy and didn't miss any time he could do what Harden is doing with the Rockets. Neither of those guys are doing any real damage in the playoffs though if they don't get KD and Howard back healthy.
Yup, for once I agree with Simmons. And to be honest, I'd put him second in MVP right now, with Harden first and Curry third, though I'll surely be roasted for that.
Naw, that's a reasonable opinion to hold though I would go Curry, Harden, GOAT, and then maybe LeBron.
I honestly think Curry has been the best player in the league this season and certainly better than Harden and RUss for me. I will admit it, I am biased against Harden. I find him to be one of the most boring superstars to watch of all-time so maybe I am not being objective here but in terms of watchability it's: Russ and Curry. Harden doesn't even register for me lol.
If the Warrions win ~65 games in this brutal West, Curry has to get it IMO.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
bondom34 wrote:I completely get that train of thought too, and had Curry til recently when I tried to put my Harden bias aside and look at it more. If I look at the three rosters and rank healthy players, Curry is best but best and most valuable don't match. After Curry I'd put Russ and Harden, then probably the next 2/3 guys are on GSW. Klay, Bogut, and Green all are better or equal to Ibaka this season to me, and haven't missed substantial time. Harden has no help at all and has been doing this longer than Russ, so I give an edge there.
JordansBulls wrote:The Warriors are basically a good college team until they meet a team with bigs in the NBA.
Greatness wrote:I'm with Bondom, Harden should be the MVP.
JordansBulls wrote:The Warriors are basically a good college team until they meet a team with bigs in the NBA.
JordansBulls wrote:The Warriors are basically a good college team until they meet a team with bigs in the NBA.
PaulieWal wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/royceyoung/status/580114178708492288[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/tomhaberstroh/status/580004773895778304[/tweet]
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO