The High Cyde wrote:Honestly feel a bit honored you quoted me Doc, thanks for that!
The thing is, I've repeated a couple times I do not enjoy seeing this Warriors team play. I feel if I keep doing it I'll come off as a troll who only says that one thing. Let me start by addressing your three points.
1) Steph and Klay are the two best shooters the league has ever seen, it's plain as day to see. My gripe with this is that the two best shooters ever are on the same team (I'm not knocking the GSW organization for this, mind, just pointing out just how much of an outlier this fact is when looking at the roster of teams). They are so much better at shooting threes (and shooting in general (like for FTs)) than anyone else on the other team that it kills the competition. I expect Steph and Klay to bomb like 35 threes and make like 20 of them. I don't see the excitement in seeing threes being shot every other possession.
2) For the outstanding passing and movement...I agree completely. This is a stacked team. Top to bottom. The players are not only athletic but they're smart out there on the court. The fact that the two best shooters ever are on the same team who are able to pull up from 30 and yeah, there will be enough space to put the Solar System to shame. This isn't lost on me, I acknowledge their greatness, I will not shy from admitting it. The only team that I've seen pass like that consistently is the 2014 Finals' Spurs. I can't knock this team for their passing, movement, and basketball IQ. This is unequivocally one of the best teams ever.
3) Outstanding resilience...I don't know about that, Doc. Yeah, they came back 2-1 in the Grizzlies series, they came back 2-1 against Cleveland last year, and this year obviously they punched back from 3-1. Okay, so what? The Grizz were injured; they were never going to beat GS. Same with the Cleveland series. LeBron had one of the best statistical Finals of all time, but one man does not beat a team as great as these Warriors. Now, the OKC series, that was tough, they didn't get rattled too much. But OKC clearly lost that series more than the Warriors won it (to my eyes at least). Durant and Westbrook straight wet the bed, they just couldn't hit a damn three to save their lives while Klay Thompson was hitting them from 30 feet on a standstill jumpshot, I mean what?? How do you defend that? And his teammate is even better? Whaaaaaat! Catch my drift? Course you do, you're one of the best minds on here haha
They do have good attitude. But this is professional sports, you have to have good attitude. Plus why wouldn't they? They won 73, about to repeat as champions, there's very little that would get them down. Regardless, yes, I do like their general attitude of having that champ swagger, but they're cocky as hell, rightfully so though. Can't knock them for this either.
Had OKC just shot decent (especially Durant) the last couple games they would have won. Like, there's no question of that in my mind...yet the Warriors are so good that they are going to force Durant to work on his game this summer, they're gonna force a 4 time scoring champion and MVP to get better. Yeah, I'll give the Warriors credit for making it difficult on the Thunder, but the Thunder *had* it. It was right there. They couldn't do it. *shrug
Tsherkin and Bondom had this same debate about the luck of which way the ball bounces in determining this series. I don't who it is exactly, but some member here has a sig with a Doc Rivers quote: It's a make or miss league, and it always will be. Warriors have two players who are the best of all time in this respect. It's almost not fair, but they are just that good, and when you're so good at something, it gets boring (again, to me at least).
I think it's great so many of you guys enjoy watching this team, appreciate the schemes and gameplans and plays they run. I like that too! It's just the destination kills me: pass, pass, pass, shoot three. Rinse and repeat. To this one can say: Well, their three point shot opens up the game for drives and kicks, which happens multiple times a game, it's how they sustain leads, teams get scared of them shooting threes so they panic and GS capitalizes on it, as they should. That's great too.
I'm not trying to troll the Warriors or just hate on them, because fundamentally I just do not enjoy watching them play. I'd rather watch Boogie and the Kings play to be quite honest with you. Or the Wolves, Blazers, Celtics,OKC, or Knicks. Warriors are too perfect for my taste. Give me dysfunction, good post play, and semi-bad shots to keep me entertained. Don't bore me by running around like headless chickens taking 50 threes (I guess this goes towards the majority of the league now). Anyways, sorry Doc, I've tried to say it as best I can, and I mean no disrespect to the Warriors. Great team, great organization, even better players.

Well, my pleasure. And thank you for taking my disagreement, such as it is, in stride.
Responding to your points:
1) The one thing I'd say when lamenting the shooting specifically, while acknowledging that it's a legit taste preference issue, is that Golden State right now is dominating the Eastern champion with a game that isn't really insane-shooting based at all. I realize that the gravity of Steph/Klay remains, and that has everything to do with why GS can do this...but I think it's crazy impressive that they can look this good with such ensemble scoring and defense. Nothing says "this is special" to me more than that.
2) I'd just want to draw a distinction: Not every guy out there has a brilliant individual BBIQ. The reason why every single guy looks smart is because of the structure and vibe that Kerr and his staff put in place. It very much feels like Pete Carroll's USC football team. I'm not saying that their individual BBIQ's on average aren't quite good, but the BBIQ on display is WAY beyond that, and that's where I can't help but be a fan.
3) I think you're putting too many qualifiers on what resilience is. The fact that as favorite they "should" be able to come back doesn't mean that if they do so they haven't earned - what I'll call - resilience points. The bigger favorite you are, the easier it is to get lost in your head - this is why teams who are said to have "nothing to lose" at times play so well. LeBron in particular has a track record for struggling precisely along these lines and seeing his team do it as well. (Although for those looking to call LeBron a choker, Kobe arguably had a worse track record though it manifested differently. Kobe's style tended to make his teammates lose their way leading to them losing by 30 in their elimination game.)
The Warriors have had plenty of reasons to doubt themselves. They haven't. Is their prior track record of success now helping them remain resolute? Sure, but that's just another way of saying that they think like champions now, and of course the thing about that is, you have to actually earn that.
Re: OKC losing more than GS winning. I disagree. As you said, GS doesn't win without freak shooting - even by their own standards. Fine to point out issues with what OKC did, but GS's top two scoring option stepped up BIG time, and in the end OKC is left having lost a very close series to a team that has had about as good of a season as any in history.
I keep saying it: Durant would be crazy to leave unless he actively personally dislikes the situation for reasons that aren't about basketball. It should be well set in all superstars minds now, as they watch LeBron struggle to find synergy yet again, that you can't just put a bunch of stars together and expect them to be anywhere near as good as the Warriors are. The Thunder have an actual matchup advantage against the Warriors, they have young role players who can get better, and they have a coach who can probably fine tune the team more. They are by far the biggest threat to GS's continued dominance right now, and that's not something to be tossed aside.
Re: last paragraph. Y'know, everyone is allowed to have their own taste. You're expressing your thoughts just fine and I look forward to more conversations with you.
I think it's tough for fans who really love a skill that gets "nerfed" by new rules & strategies. I tend to be pretty callous about it for a lot of people because to me they are just doing "old man yells at cloud"...even if they aren't old, but your taste is your own, and you aren't alone in being frustrated with the direction things are going.