The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1121 » by MyUniBroDavis » Fri Nov 27, 2020 11:50 pm

nzahir wrote:We are at 11 guys right?
KCP, Wes, Bron, AD, Gasol
Dennis, AC, Kuzma, Kieff, Trez
THT

Looks like we are bringing Cook back I believe, was watching a Lakers Nation Video.

Puts us at 12 if true. Dudley likely back for vet presence. So 13

Another wing or Another Big?

We have 1 legit C and AD.

Batum could be a high upside play if bought out.

GR3 could be ok I guess

A big like Kyle O Quinn, Tyson, Henson for random injury depth?


Tbf over the RS harrell is fine at center even tho he and ad ad should run center defensively
O_6
Rookie
Posts: 1,179
And1: 1,586
Joined: Aug 25, 2010

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1122 » by O_6 » Sat Nov 28, 2020 6:37 am

#1 A legitimate stretch 5.

Dwight and Javale put in a lot of effort for their roles, their respective athleticism was a clear plus for the Lakers. Losing two true centers with excellent jumping skills is definitely going to be a loss. Javale has his shortcomings but dude was very good around the basket offensively, especially when he’s not doing something dumb lol. Javale is a special type of player. Dwight doesn’t have Javales size but he’s stronger and significantly smarter which is why he got the minutes when it mattered. Gasol isn’t as athletic as Dwight or Javale which is a negative, however he brings so much more to the table from a BBIQ/Passing/Shooting perspective.

“LeBron with space” has been the scariest thing to hear for a decade now, but this is the first time he’s getting a stretch 5 who can bang with the biggest dudes on the low post defensively and be an overall plus on D. IF “major IF” Gasol has gas left in the tank, he’s going to be a an awesome addition due to the spacing + defense he provides. LeBron + Davis with a stretch who’s a plus defender and plus 3pt shooter and plus passer? Major upgrade if Gasol isn’t toast.

2. Harrell replacing McGee

Due to the timing, people looked at Harrell and saw him as replacing Dwight. But honestly, Gasol is the one replacing Dwight and Harrell was just replacing Javale. There is no way possible that you can look at the McGee to Harrell upgrade and think anything else besides “major upgrade”. McGee was a poor defender, he was getting roasted by Jokic himself. Harrell is so much better at creating his own offense and dribbling in general, the entire LA offense will be significantly more complete because of it. AD vs. Giannis remains an intriguing comparison, AD was a beast in the playoffs but Giannis doesn’t have LeBron ‘effin James on his team either. But one clear advantage for AD is that his jumper provides spacing, Harrell seems like he’ll be better on the Lakers than the Clippers because of ADs uniquely dominant skillset on both ends. His jumper will provide space for Harrell inside while his rim protection will help cover Harrells defensive shortcomings. LeBron as a creator will undoubtedly help Harrell get better looks as well. I think Harrell with be an important role player due to his scoring skills, better than most expect.

3. Schroder vs. Regular Season Rondo vs. Playoff Rondo

The funniest thing to happen to Lakers fans last year was watching them change up their opinions on Rondo. He was considered an absolute joke in the regular season and then he was arguably their 3rd most important player in the playoffs. Rondo is a very interesting kinda player, he’s a possible HOFer (I think he still has things to do to be a HOFer) who is truly a brilliant mind with experience. Schroder does not provide such experience and intelligence or passing, he provides quickness and scoring. It will be a different dynamic. It’s almost impossible for this dynamic to be worse in the regular season but playoff Schroder vs. playoff Rondo will be a storyline that hangs over the Lakers’ heads throughout the entire year including the playoffs. Can Schroder maintain good enough defense and good enough scoring/creating in a playoff setting?

There are certainly questions, the stuff I’ve mentioned plus other things (Matthews’ ability to cover for Danny Green being another). But to me, these Lakers have the potential to be an absolutely dominant team. They could push a 65 win/8 SRS pace imo; and they’ll be the best team in the league barring Harden going to Brooklyn (even then that team will be a ?).

LeBron has never had a better team on paper. This is a dominant looking squad in a wide open (besides potentially the Nets) league (as of now). LeBron is a true GOAT candidate right now, whether he can capitalize on rings remains to be seen. A repeat at this stage in his career would be massive. It’ll be fascinating to see if he can still be the best player in the league and get it done.
nzahir
RealGM
Posts: 11,614
And1: 5,098
Joined: Nov 04, 2017
 

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1123 » by nzahir » Sat Nov 28, 2020 8:46 am

Man am I hyped for this season =)

I only bring up having another center for depth or injury issues. Say AD wants to sit a game and Gasol or Trez are nicked up.

I really do wish we had a bit more shooting though in the actual rotation
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1124 » by MyUniBroDavis » Sat Nov 28, 2020 8:48 am

O_6 wrote:#1 A legitimate stretch 5.

Dwight and Javale put in a lot of effort for their roles, their respective athleticism was a clear plus for the Lakers. Losing two true centers with excellent jumping skills is definitely going to be a loss. Javale has his shortcomings but dude was very good around the basket offensively, especially when he’s not doing something dumb lol. Javale is a special type of player. Dwight doesn’t have Javales size but he’s stronger and significantly smarter which is why he got the minutes when it mattered. Gasol isn’t as athletic as Dwight or Javale which is a negative, however he brings so much more to the table from a BBIQ/Passing/Shooting perspective.

“LeBron with space” has been the scariest thing to hear for a decade now, but this is the first time he’s getting a stretch 5 who can bang with the biggest dudes on the low post defensively and be an overall plus on D. IF “major IF” Gasol has gas left in the tank, he’s going to be a an awesome addition due to the spacing + defense he provides. LeBron + Davis with a stretch who’s a plus defender and plus 3pt shooter and plus passer? Major upgrade if Gasol isn’t toast.

2. Harrell replacing McGee

Due to the timing, people looked at Harrell and saw him as replacing Dwight. But honestly, Gasol is the one replacing Dwight and Harrell was just replacing Javale. There is no way possible that you can look at the McGee to Harrell upgrade and think anything else besides “major upgrade”. McGee was a poor defender, he was getting roasted by Jokic himself. Harrell is so much better at creating his own offense and dribbling in general, the entire LA offense will be significantly more complete because of it. AD vs. Giannis remains an intriguing comparison, AD was a beast in the playoffs but Giannis doesn’t have LeBron ‘effin James on his team either. But one clear advantage for AD is that his jumper provides spacing, Harrell seems like he’ll be better on the Lakers than the Clippers because of ADs uniquely dominant skillset on both ends. His jumper will provide space for Harrell inside while his rim protection will help cover Harrells defensive shortcomings. LeBron as a creator will undoubtedly help Harrell get better looks as well. I think Harrell with be an important role player due to his scoring skills, better than most expect.

3. Schroder vs. Regular Season Rondo vs. Playoff Rondo

The funniest thing to happen to Lakers fans last year was watching them change up their opinions on Rondo. He was considered an absolute joke in the regular season and then he was arguably their 3rd most important player in the playoffs. Rondo is a very interesting kinda player, he’s a possible HOFer (I think he still has things to do to be a HOFer) who is truly a brilliant mind with experience. Schroder does not provide such experience and intelligence or passing, he provides quickness and scoring. It will be a different dynamic. It’s almost impossible for this dynamic to be worse in the regular season but playoff Schroder vs. playoff Rondo will be a storyline that hangs over the Lakers’ heads throughout the entire year including the playoffs. Can Schroder maintain good enough defense and good enough scoring/creating in a playoff setting?

There are certainly questions, the stuff I’ve mentioned plus other things (Matthews’ ability to cover for Danny Green being another). But to me, these Lakers have the potential to be an absolutely dominant team. They could push a 65 win/8 SRS pace imo; and they’ll be the best team in the league barring Harden going to Brooklyn (even then that team will be a ?).

LeBron has never had a better team on paper. This is a dominant looking squad in a wide open (besides potentially the Nets) league (as of now). LeBron is a true GOAT candidate right now, whether he can capitalize on rings remains to be seen. A repeat at this stage in his career would be massive. It’ll be fascinating to see if he can still be the best player in the league and get it done.


I think gasol filling that dwight role for situational matchups against top physically imposing centers, arguably better than he did himself, is huge. Added ability to do well blitzing the p and r (vs curry 2019) and his overall defensive ability being higher and stretching the floor are all added bonuses, and i think they all more than make up for that lost athleticism

Harrell is interesting because lookkng at it more and more, it looks like hes defensively more suited to be a 4, and he NEVER played at the 4 in the clippers. He played like, 20 minutes with zubac their only true center.

His defensive problems are

1. Rim protection at the 5 spot
2. Low post defense at the 5 soot
3. "Switchability".

1,2 become strengths at the 4 potentially, while i think theres a shot he ends up as a switchable type defender based off some stuff ive been seeing from 2019. His p and r defense wasnt bad, its more so the clippers ran the wrong coverages and so it looks like its his fault

Offensively he and schroder work really well, and his fit with AD is great for him, although i prefer AD with spacing harrell is a genuine all star level scorer at times.

Schroder doesnt have the team defense playoff rondo had huut he makes up for it by being a significantly better on ball defender, and while his overall playmaking isnt as good hes more of threat as a scorer and cant be left open, and is better at getting to the and being a scoring threat in the pick and roll. Rondo was great in the playoffs but at times he was still stagnant with the ball, and if we were running man he got targetted, although when we ran zone he was great. With schroder i expect it to be the other way around but its not gonna be a huge disparity, he'll be great when we run man D and decent when we run more zone switchy stuff.

Matthews probably isnt as good as rs green but hes a better defender on ball, not as good off ball

Otoh, i like having more on ball defenders rhan help defenders. People fall into the trap that team defense is always more valuable when its a situational thing. Typically if you dont have that team defense guy it sucks, but when you have 2 of the best at it jn their position in bron and AD, sure having more helps but you want more guys able to guard the point of attack allowing them to do their thing

Schroder is a good on ball defender for guards, caruso is good at it in general as well. Now we add matthews whose good at it and also good at guarding wings. Hopefully we see kuz continue his growth in that regard, he looked really good defensively in the bubble at times

The thing is, the fit could be quite good and from a talent perspective we replaced 2/4 guys we replaced were situational pieces,1 had a bad playoffs, 1 was good in the playoffs but horrible in the RS and did have a few stinkers in the postseason as well, with 3 guys that are legitimately goot enough to be a top 3-6 player on a contender, and a solid 3 and D llayer that might fit us better than he did the bucks

Harrell talent wise was the clippers 3rd best player, he was "exposed" in the sense that he cant guard centers that even guys like AD have their hands full guarding.

Marc is a year off from being a starting center for a championship team, was able to stay on the court with the warrors and good at blitzing p and r, and even though his offense was bleh during the bubble he was genuinly one of their most impactful defenders over the past two years (actually was the best in net def rtg in the playoffs 2019 outside of the 76ers series which is cuz he matched minutes with embiid, worth noting embiids numbers in the few minutes with him off the court were amazing iirc)

Finally, schroder was statistucally okc's 2nd or third best scorer, probably behind only gallo and cp3. He was a solid piece defensively and was just overall a good player for them.

Theres some downside to every signing, schroder's shooting could regress, harrell could be bad, matthews and marc are older, but theres alot of upside and potentially we have a roster where our 8th best player is as good as a typical contendor" 4th best player, and that doesnt even bring up how kuz and tht pan out.

We get underestimated historically because of the bubble performance last year. At the end of the day we were a 64 win team pre bubble trending upwards, our srs at the time around 7.4-8 ish, and RS wise we went waaay up in talent

Not only that, but we'll be a team like that with 1 player that goes up from great to KG Duncan tier defensively in the playoffs, and the other player is lebron

The nets are scary, the bucks if they figure things out, clippers are always threatening with kawhi

But then again last urar was supposed to be the most competetive year ever, our closest series was a 6 game series where we were chilling the whole time, and we probably had the second best offseason (the bucks got jrue, jrue is INSANE)
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1125 » by MyUniBroDavis » Sat Nov 28, 2020 8:50 am

nzahir wrote:Man am I hyped for this season =)

I only bring up having another center for depth or injury issues. Say AD wants to sit a game and Gasol or Trez are nicked up.

I really do wish we had a bit more shooting though in the actual rotation


Our lineup rn is

Lebron/Schroder
Kcp/Caruso
Kuzma/Matthews
AD/Markieff
Marc/Harrell

Id say given schroders shooting is the same, only kuz/caruso/harrell struggle shooting wise.

A batum would be nice, so would another center because i prefer harrell at the 4 spot (given we get a stretch 4)
nzahir
RealGM
Posts: 11,614
And1: 5,098
Joined: Nov 04, 2017
 

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1126 » by nzahir » Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:07 pm

Looks like Batum is going to the Clippers

Damn, o well
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,706
And1: 7,692
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1127 » by Fadeaway_J » Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:30 pm

nzahir wrote:Looks like Batum is going to the Clippers

Damn, o well

Why is this bad news?
User avatar
xb3at band1tx
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,918
And1: 2,520
Joined: Sep 29, 2012
     

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1128 » by xb3at band1tx » Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:15 pm

Batum is pretty washed but I mean there's not much as else for the Clipps to nab

He's definitely gonna get PT over there, considering PG and Kawhi are eventually gonna take some games off
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1129 » by MyUniBroDavis » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:23 am

Fadeaway_J wrote:
nzahir wrote:Looks like Batum is going to the Clippers

Damn, o well

Why is this bad news?


If its between him and glenn robinson theres prolly more reaard with him

If he gets his three back hes a solid 3 and D guy

Idk how robinsons defense is, but he looks better offensively off a glance
nzahir
RealGM
Posts: 11,614
And1: 5,098
Joined: Nov 04, 2017
 

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1130 » by nzahir » Mon Nov 30, 2020 5:27 am

Fadeaway_J wrote:
nzahir wrote:Looks like Batum is going to the Clippers

Damn, o well

Why is this bad news?

Could have been extra depth, likely will not be very useful and or hurt

But he has a decent ceiling if he can get back to the guy he was a few years ago

He may be locked in to get another deal

GR3 is gone too

Bring back Dudley
Bring back Cook or another pg
Bring in another C for depth
limbo
Veteran
Posts: 2,799
And1: 2,681
Joined: Jun 30, 2019

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1131 » by limbo » Mon Nov 30, 2020 10:16 am

Korver is still available, should the Lakers go for him or is he done?

I mean, is he really worse than Dudley? Unless you value Dudley's locker room presence that much.
The Master
Starter
Posts: 2,029
And1: 3,595
Joined: Dec 30, 2016

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1132 » by The Master » Mon Nov 30, 2020 10:35 am

limbo wrote:Korver is still available, should the Lakers go for him or is he done?

We're talking about ~11-13th rotation pieces, I'm fine with regular season-only signings, and Korver was good enough to play 17mpg for +9.4 SRS/2nd round team. He would be decent signing even if he's going to be benched after 1st round.

Way better than Dudley.
User avatar
Mos_Heat
RealGM
Posts: 10,628
And1: 37,001
Joined: Jan 12, 2016
Location: Meh
 

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1133 » by Mos_Heat » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:28 pm

KTM_2813 wrote:I don't think that I've ever been as confused by the Dunc'd On podcast as I was this morning. They gave the Clippers a B+ offseason grade and the Lakers a C- offseason grade, and are fully back on the Clippers hype train (although in fairness, they said that the Lakers are probably still the favorite). They painted the Harrell signing as a complete disaster, and also said that the Lakers now have a smaller margin of error than they did before (or something along those lines). I guess I just see it differently. I feel like the Lakers have a ton of options now, and worse case scenario, can always deploy essentially the exact same closing lineup as last year, or at least a similar one with maybe one part swapped out.

I would agree with C+/B- grade.

Clips in theory should have top 3 offense and defense
:reporter:
Greyhound
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,815
And1: 2,723
Joined: Jul 15, 2002
Location: Earth

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1134 » by Greyhound » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:20 pm

LikeABosh wrote:
nzahir wrote:We are at 11 guys right?
KCP, Wes, Bron, AD, Gasol
Dennis, AC, Kuzma, Kieff, Trez
THT

Looks like we are bringing Cook back I believe, was watching a Lakers Nation Video.

Puts us at 12 if true. Dudley likely back for vet presence. So 13

Another wing or Another Big?

We have 1 legit C and AD.

Batum could be a high upside play if bought out.

GR3 could be ok I guess

A big like Kyle O Quinn, Tyson, Henson for random injury depth?


Kostas and McKinnie are on the roster too last I checked

McKinnie is there, Kostas is a two-way.
Don't believe the hype...
KTM_2813
Pro Prospect
Posts: 783
And1: 727
Joined: Mar 23, 2016
     

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1135 » by KTM_2813 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:38 pm

Mos_Heat wrote:
KTM_2813 wrote:I don't think that I've ever been as confused by the Dunc'd On podcast as I was this morning. They gave the Clippers a B+ offseason grade and the Lakers a C- offseason grade, and are fully back on the Clippers hype train (although in fairness, they said that the Lakers are probably still the favorite). They painted the Harrell signing as a complete disaster, and also said that the Lakers now have a smaller margin of error than they did before (or something along those lines). I guess I just see it differently. I feel like the Lakers have a ton of options now, and worse case scenario, can always deploy essentially the exact same closing lineup as last year, or at least a similar one with maybe one part swapped out.

I would agree with C+/B- grade.

Clips in theory should have top 3 offense and defense


I'm curious to see if Lue emphasizes offense to the same extent he did with the Cavaliers from 2016-2018. I remember him almost always siding with that side of the ball during that time. However, he may have made those choices based on how limited those rosters were defensively. The Clippers obviously have much better personnel. I can totally see them having a top-three defense, but could also see them falling significantly below that based on Lue's philosophy and injuries.
sansterre wrote:The success of a star's season is:

Individual performance + Teammate performance - Opposition +/- Luck
User avatar
Mos_Heat
RealGM
Posts: 10,628
And1: 37,001
Joined: Jan 12, 2016
Location: Meh
 

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1136 » by Mos_Heat » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:56 pm

KTM_2813 wrote:
Mos_Heat wrote:
KTM_2813 wrote:I don't think that I've ever been as confused by the Dunc'd On podcast as I was this morning. They gave the Clippers a B+ offseason grade and the Lakers a C- offseason grade, and are fully back on the Clippers hype train (although in fairness, they said that the Lakers are probably still the favorite). They painted the Harrell signing as a complete disaster, and also said that the Lakers now have a smaller margin of error than they did before (or something along those lines). I guess I just see it differently. I feel like the Lakers have a ton of options now, and worse case scenario, can always deploy essentially the exact same closing lineup as last year, or at least a similar one with maybe one part swapped out.

I would agree with C+/B- grade.

Clips in theory should have top 3 offense and defense


I'm curious to see if Lue emphasizes offense to the same extent he did with the Cavaliers from 2016-2018. I remember him almost always siding with that side of the ball during that time. However, he may have made those choices based on how limited those rosters were defensively. The Clippers obviously have much better personnel. I can totally see them having a top-three defense, but could also see them falling significantly below that based on Lue's philosophy and injuries.

I don't think that would be a problem, they don't really have bad defenders besides Lou and Kennard in the rotation. Clips were 5th last season and now improved C spot, so I expect them to be top 3 on both sides
:reporter:
kayess
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,807
And1: 1,000
Joined: Sep 29, 2013

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1137 » by kayess » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:00 pm

Mos_Heat wrote:
KTM_2813 wrote:I don't think that I've ever been as confused by the Dunc'd On podcast as I was this morning. They gave the Clippers a B+ offseason grade and the Lakers a C- offseason grade, and are fully back on the Clippers hype train (although in fairness, they said that the Lakers are probably still the favorite). They painted the Harrell signing as a complete disaster, and also said that the Lakers now have a smaller margin of error than they did before (or something along those lines). I guess I just see it differently. I feel like the Lakers have a ton of options now, and worse case scenario, can always deploy essentially the exact same closing lineup as last year, or at least a similar one with maybe one part swapped out.

I would agree with C+/B- grade.

Clips in theory should have top 3 offense and defense


I'm VERY curious on both counts: why do you think it's C+/B- for the Lakers, and that the Clips are going to have a top 3 offense and defense?
User avatar
Mos_Heat
RealGM
Posts: 10,628
And1: 37,001
Joined: Jan 12, 2016
Location: Meh
 

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1138 » by Mos_Heat » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:36 pm

kayess wrote:
Mos_Heat wrote:
KTM_2813 wrote:I don't think that I've ever been as confused by the Dunc'd On podcast as I was this morning. They gave the Clippers a B+ offseason grade and the Lakers a C- offseason grade, and are fully back on the Clippers hype train (although in fairness, they said that the Lakers are probably still the favorite). They painted the Harrell signing as a complete disaster, and also said that the Lakers now have a smaller margin of error than they did before (or something along those lines). I guess I just see it differently. I feel like the Lakers have a ton of options now, and worse case scenario, can always deploy essentially the exact same closing lineup as last year, or at least a similar one with maybe one part swapped out.

I would agree with C+/B- grade.

Clips in theory should have top 3 offense and defense


I'm VERY curious on both counts: why do you think it's C+/B- for the Lakers, and that the Clips are going to have a top 3 offense and defense?

Because I'm not a fan of neither Shcroder nor Harrell. I think they spent to much resources for bench guys

Clips finished 2nd/5th on offense/defense. To me they didn't lose much if any on offense, and got better defensively
:reporter:
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1139 » by MyUniBroDavis » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:58 pm

Mos_Heat wrote:
kayess wrote:
Mos_Heat wrote:I would agree with C+/B- grade.

Clips in theory should have top 3 offense and defense


I'm VERY curious on both counts: why do you think it's C+/B- for the Lakers, and that the Clips are going to have a top 3 offense and defense?

Because I'm not a fan of neither Shcroder nor Harrell. I think they spent to much resources for bench guys

Clips finished 2nd/5th on offense/defense. To me they didn't lose much if any on offense, and got better defensively


I mean theyre bench guys that played the most minutes overall in their team

I dont really see how

Rondo/green/dwight/javale

Schroder/matthrws/marc/harrell

Isnt a huge upgrade

A bit bummed we couldnt get glenn rob 3 or batum tho ngl
User avatar
Mos_Heat
RealGM
Posts: 10,628
And1: 37,001
Joined: Jan 12, 2016
Location: Meh
 

Re: The Lebron Thread | 2021 & Offseason 

Post#1140 » by Mos_Heat » Mon Nov 30, 2020 7:13 pm

MyUniBroDavis wrote:
Mos_Heat wrote:
kayess wrote:
I'm VERY curious on both counts: why do you think it's C+/B- for the Lakers, and that the Clips are going to have a top 3 offense and defense?

Because I'm not a fan of neither Shcroder nor Harrell. I think they spent to much resources for bench guys

Clips finished 2nd/5th on offense/defense. To me they didn't lose much if any on offense, and got better defensively


I mean theyre bench guys that played the most minutes overall in their team

I dont really see how

Rondo/green/dwight/javale

Schroder/matthrws/marc/harrell

Isnt a huge upgrade

A bit bummed we couldnt get glenn rob 3 or batum tho ngl

It's a huge upgrade in a vacuum. But they don't really need much from a C spot, cuz their best C is AD. And their best PG is Lebron, so the fit is more important than an overall level of players. To me someone like Patty Mills or George Hill and Dwight would've been better than Schroder and Harrell
:reporter:

Return to Player Comparisons