Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley

Guy986 · Post #1121 » by **Guy986** » Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:33 pm

My my my how the turn tables....

SportsWorld · Post #1122 » by **SportsWorld** » Sun Oct 31, 2010 1:31 am

I've changed my vote like 5 times.

Guy986 · Post #1123 » by **Guy986** » Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:11 am

SportsWorld wrote:I've changed my vote like 5 times.

I think i've changed 3 times.

mikhailjordan · Post #1124 » by **mikhailjordan** » Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:10 pm

The Beasley at SF experiment is a disaster and the fact that Randolph continues to try and evolve his game into that of a SF's is downright stupid.

It's sad to see these two guys with so much potential consistently under-perform.

dookieguy · Post #1125 » by **dookieguy** » Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:13 pm

mikhailjordan wrote:The Beasley at SF experiment is a disaster and the fact that Randolph continues to try and evolve his game into that of a SF's is downright stupid.

It's sad to see these two guys with so much potential consistently under-perform.

Beasley seems to be doing fine at SF for the Twolves?

Post #1126 » by **C.lupus** » Sun Oct 31, 2010 5:20 pm

Yeah, not sure how it's been a disaster after 3 games. He's been up and down, which is to be expected. Rambis is trying to teach him to play a different style of ball than he grew up playing so it's going to take some time to see if he will be successful.

Dr Positivity · Post #1127 » by **Dr Positivity** » Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:07 pm

The answer to this question is Andrea Bargnani

CB4MiamiHeat · Post #1128 » by **CB4MiamiHeat** » Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:36 am

still like Beasley here

Chosen01 · Post #1129 » by **Chosen01** » Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:40 am

Beasley has proved to better than AR by far.

Wavy Q · Post #1130 » by **Wavy Q** » Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:42 am

derp.

Vindicater · Post #1131 » by **Vindicater** » Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:10 am

Beasely easily. Before this season and now during this season

Post #1132 » by **BBallFreak** » Sun Nov 14, 2010 12:09 am

So, Beasley goes for 42 and then follows it up with 35 against AR's Knicks. Is this still a thread, or can we finally all agree that Beasley is the better player?

J-Rich- · Post #1133 » by **J-Rich-** » Sun Nov 14, 2010 12:40 am

Randolph could've been a legend like MJ or Magic if he didn't get traded

TheDeadDodo · Post #1134 » by **TheDeadDodo** » Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:11 am

J-Rich- wrote:Randolph could've been a legend like MJ or Magic if he didn't get traded

Meh, you overrate those two hacks. He'd have been better than Lebron James and Robot Lebron James combined if not for Nellie putting that voodoo curse on him and stealing his mojo back in December of '09! :evil:

Esohny · Post #1135 » by **Esohny** » Sun Nov 14, 2010 6:55 am

J-Rich- wrote:Randolph could've been a legend like MJ or Magic if he didn't get traded

Maybe Magic+MJ. No single man can approach his majesty.

Post #1136 » by **Klomp** » Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:05 am

I personally apologize to Michael Beasley for waiting this long to change my vote to him.

daniel3 · Post #1137 » by **daniel3** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:19 am

I think Beasley will be far better!

#1 pick · Post #1138 » by **#1 pick** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:03 am

i_killed_kenny wrote:Beasley might have done better out the gate had he been drafted by a team that was rebuilding. Playing with a superstar like wade and being depended on to be his robin could either accelerate your development or stunt it. Looks like the latter happened. Beasley seems like the type of bigman who needs the ball in his hands to be effective and that would become a problem when you've got wade who also needs the ball in his hands. I dunno.. im trying to figure out why his game hasnt translated to the pros just yet and im drawing a blank.

This is what I was saying all along and now look at him.

SportsWorld · Post #1139 » by **SportsWorld** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:54 am

It's Beasley by a mile. Finally turning into the player most people envisioned him to become. Just needed to be the #1 scoring option on the team for him to work out.

Ayt · Post #1140 » by **Ayt** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:25 am

blueNorange wrote:randolph traded for an allstar
beasley traded for a 2nd rounder

proof is in the pudding.

Who will be the better player?