Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley

SKR · Post #1141 » by **SKR** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:40 am

Beasley has been BEASTIN this year. If he keeps this up comparisons like this will fade into the mist by next offseason

TAI8 · Post #1142 » by **TAI8** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:10 pm

Where's that guy that kept calling Beasley a bust? I think his name was I never lied. He must be feeling pretty stupid right about now...

Wavy Q · Post #1143 » by **Wavy Q** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:22 pm

Is it time for...

Michael BEASTLEY?

crzy · Post #1144 » by **crzy** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:18 pm

Thankfully, i don't care anymore about this comparison.

dookieguy · Post #1145 » by **dookieguy** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:10 pm

TAI8 wrote:Where's that guy that kept calling Beasley a bust? I think his name was I never lied. He must be feeling pretty stupid right about now...

-Illmatic- · Post #1146 » by **-Illmatic-** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:41 pm

171 people looking pretty dumb right now. Luckily I voted for Michael Beasley when this thread began.

Wade2k6 · Post #1147 » by **Wade2k6** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:28 pm

This was never a comparison in the first place. Beasley has always been the better player, even when he was constantly benched because of Spo. Now that he doesn't have to worry about being benched for every mistake he makes, he's scoring 20+ ppg on good effienccy. He's putting up 25 points per game and 6 rebounds per game PER36 minutes on a TS of 55.5%.

Chosen01 · Post #1148 » by **Chosen01** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:35 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:This was never a comparison in the first place. Beasley has always been the better player, even when he was constantly benched because of Spo. Now that he doesn't have to worry about being benched for every mistake he makes, he's scoring 20+ ppg on good effienccy. He's putting up 25 points per game and 6 rebounds per game PER36 minutes on a TS of 55.5%.

This. Its an absolute joke that people thought AR/Gallo/Bargs/Hickson were better than Beasley at one time.

Vindicater · Post #1149 » by **Vindicater** » Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:28 pm

Its just funny how much people got down on a No. 2 overall pick who averaged 26 and 8 in the college ranks after two seasons.

ballhawk1 · Post #1150 » by **ballhawk1** » Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:20 am

This comparison looks bad...

JoseRizal · Post #1151 » by **JoseRizal** » Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:17 am

At this very moment, Anthony Randolph has not shown anything to warrant this kind of comparison...

YounG_A · Post #1152 » by **YounG_A** » Fri Nov 19, 2010 9:45 pm

I have always picked Beasley over Randolph...LMAO

how ridiculous does this comparison look now that Beasley is getting his chance and not being held back by Spo.

Post #1153 » by **BrooklynBulls** » Fri Nov 19, 2010 9:51 pm

Anthony Randolph isn't really getting much of a chance at this point. I'm not the biggest fan of either player, but just because one's situation changed for the better while another guy is now playing behind the team's 20 million dollar man and their franchise PF doesn't really say much about AR. I was looking forward to him actually getting to play, but he's getting precious little burn.

Ayt · Post #1154 » by **Ayt** » Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:01 pm

BrooklynBulls wrote:Anthony Randolph isn't really getting much of a chance at this point. I'm not the biggest fan of either player, but just because one's situation changed for the better while another guy is now playing behind the team's 20 million dollar man and their franchise PF doesn't really say much about AR. I was looking forward to him actually getting to play, but he's getting precious little burn.

That really isn't an excuse since Randolph can play all 5 positions.

Esohny · Post #1155 » by **Esohny** » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:13 am

Ayt wrote:
BrooklynBulls wrote:Anthony Randolph isn't really getting much of a chance at this point. I'm not the biggest fan of either player, but just because one's situation changed for the better while another guy is now playing behind the team's 20 million dollar man and their franchise PF doesn't really say much about AR. I was looking forward to him actually getting to play, but he's getting precious little burn.

That really isn't an excuse since Randolph can play all 5 positions.

At the same time.

Ayt · Post #1156 » by **Ayt** » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:32 pm

While still being the best 6th man in the L.

BROWN · Post #1157 » by **BROWN** » Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:11 am

Anthony is not growing anytime soon. Filled with talent, but no brains. To Beasley, your offense is to be reckon with, keep going at it.

oaktownwarriors87 · Post #1158 » by **oaktownwarriors87** » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:35 am

Wade2k6 wrote:This was never a comparison in the first place. Beasley has always been the better player, even when he was constantly benched because of Spo. Now that he doesn't have to worry about being benched for every mistake he makes, he's scoring 20+ ppg on good effienccy. He's putting up 25 points per game and 6 rebounds per game PER36 minutes on a TS of 55.5%.

Thanks for the sig

Reasonable Fan · Post #1159 » by **Reasonable Fan** » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:58 am

Magic Randolph... he's the new Jon Bender/Lampe/Vujanic/overrated-player-here (Dwight Harrison, Wilt Hibbert, Elton Diogu, Brandon Miller... notice a pattern yet?)

Don't worry, in a few years he'll be injured and then his whole career being crap can be blamed on the injury.

Indy2thaWindy · Post #1160 » by **Indy2thaWindy** » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:59 am

Magic

Who will be the better player?