therealbig3 wrote:I mean does it say something about AD's defense being overrated? Luka for AD should be an obvious defensive downgrade, but the Lakers have gotten clearly better.
So I feel like these two videos from TB speak to a successful trend going on right now:
Basically we're seeing successful defense come from (relatively) shorter guys are
a) quicker in running around the court
b) able to be extremely physical without getting called for fouls
c) using that physicality to clog the interior while using the quickness to at least put some pressure on the 3-point shooters when they ball pops out to that now sparse perimeter.
(Let me acknowledge that a healthy OKC has access to height too.)
How does all of this relate to AD?
1) The defensive improvement actually took hold with AD mid-season, so this is probably first and foremost about the team gaining proficiency with Redick's tactic rather than something AD was holding back.
However,
2) Extreme physicality has never been AD's thing. He's more of a long than a big, and his body isn't resilient to wear & tear as much as, say, LeBron is. This then to say that with this style of play, I don't believe AD was ever an outright weakness, but other players are gaining value from it more than he is.
With that said:
3) I think we need to consider how sustainable these approaches are. I think they're using up a ton of energy on defense right now. Aside from the aspect of "using up fuel", there's also this aspect of the Thunder & Lakers are getting what they're getting right now by playing a playoff level intensity, and so we may find that the approach is less effective when the other team matches intensity while have their coaching staff completely fixed on finding weakness over a 7 game series.
To be clear, I would see the Thunder as championship favorites and I'm not going to say the Lakers can't win it, but I do think we're watching a new leg in the ongoing tactical arms race, and it's going to be interesting to see the response.