cecilthesheep wrote:No-more-rings wrote:freethedevil wrote:There is no way to know that and it is to ridiculous to assert that.
The cavs weren't as good as the spurs either unless we only look at offense.
Which part is ridiculous?
I find it absurd that the Spurs could take more than 2 games against those Warriors.
call me a homer but I'm actually totally in on the idea that the Spurs could have beat the warriors that year. That spurs team was REALLY good. Way better than people remember. It's easy to say the Warriors were just unbeatable looking back on it but the reality is they were very close to losing every single year. Once it was the Thunder, once it was the Rockets, once the Cavs did beat them, and in 2017 it could have been the Spurs.
I’m not buying this at all.
None of those years you mentioned were the Warriors nearly as good as they were in those playoffs. In 2018 they were just worse in every possible way, 2017 was that one year where basically everyone was playing at their best or close to it and everyone was healthy. But it’s something i may start a thread on because i find it ridiculous honestly.
The 2018 Rockets actually had a better record, better offense and defense, everything over the Warriors that year so them nearly beating is a way different story.